Skip to main content

Computational Thinking in Context Across Curriculum: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. Rethinking Computing Education (ISSEP 2021)

Abstract

Integration of computational thinking (CT) into numerous disciplines across the K-12 curriculum is gaining increased attention. In this study, based on the technology integration framework, we investigated how students’ understandings, difficulties, and attitudes towards learning subject matter varied at different levels of CT integration. We implemented six different case studies by integrating CT into six different subjects: science, traffic, language, biology, geography, and physics. Two primary and four secondary school teachers, 38 primary school students, and 113 secondary school students were involved in the study. We categorized these lessons according to the technology integration model: unplugged activities are grouped as augmentation level; robotic and two modeling activities are labeled as modification level; modeling and digital storytelling activities are labeled as redefinition level. Our findings indicate that students reported a very positive attitude toward redefinition level activities. Teachers stated that compared to standard instructional activities, students can go deeper and understand the subject content better in CT integrated lessons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/koeppen.htm.

References

  1. Almeida, R., et al.: iProg: getting started with programming: pilot experiment in two elementary schools. In: 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE), pp. 1–5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baek, Y., et al.: Revisiting second graders’ robotics with an understand/use-modify-create (U2MC) strategy. Eur. J. STEM Educ. 4, 1 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barendsen, E., Bruggink, M.: Het volle potentieel van de computer leren benutten: over informatica en computational thinking (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basu, S., Biswas, G., Kinnebrew, J.S.: Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a computational thinking-based science learning environment. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 27(1), 5–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Benitti, F.B.V.: Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Comput. Educ. 58(3), 978–988 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bocconi, S., et al.: Developing computational thinking in compulsory education. Eur. Comm. JRC Sci. Policy Rep. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brackmann, C.P., et al.: Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. Presented at the (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burgett, T. et al.: DISSECT: analysis of pedagogical techniques to integrate computational thinking into K-12 curricula. In: 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, L., et al.: Research Methods in Education, 6th edn. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Cuny, J., et al.: Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Work in Progress (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Curzon, P., et al.: Introducing teachers to computational thinking using unplugged storytelling. In: Proceedings of the 9th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, pp. 89–92 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Djurdjevic-Pahl, A., Pahl, C., Fronza, I., El Ioini, N.: A pathway into computational thinking in primary schools. In: Wu, T.-T., Gennari, R., Huang, Y.-M., Xie, H., Cao, Y. (eds.) SETE 2016. LNCS, vol. 10108, pp. 165–175. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52836-6_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Grover, S., Pea, R.: Computational thinking in K–12 a review of the state of the field. Educ. Res. 42(1), 38–43 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guzdial, M.: Computing for Other Disciplines. Cambridge, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arastoopour Irgens, G., et al.: Modeling and measuring high school students’ computational thinking practices in science. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 29(1), 137–161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09811-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jawad, H.M., et al.: Integrating art and animation in teaching computer programming for high school students experimental study. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electro/Information Technology (EIT), pp. 0311–0317. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kafai, Y.B., et al.: A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. TOCE. 14(1), 1–20 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kordaki, M., Kakavas, P.: Digital storytelling as an effective framework for the development of computational thinking skills. In: EDULEARN 2017, pp. 3–5 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lévano, M., et al.: Methodological framework for the development of computational thinking and programming through experiential learning: case study from schools Juan Seguel and Allipen in Freire, Chile. In: 9th IADIS International Conference, p. 107 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Looi, C.-K., et al.: Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking. Comput. Sci. Educ. 28(3), 255–279 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lytle, N., et al.: Use, modify, create: comparing computational thinking lesson progressions for STEM classes. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, pp. 395–401 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nygren, E., et al.: Quantitizing affective data as project evaluation on the use of a mathematics mobile game and intelligent tutoring system. Inform. Educ. 18(2), 375–402 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Parsazadeh, N., et al.: Integrating computational thinking concept into digital storytelling to improve learners’ motivation and performance. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 59(3), 470–495 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peel, A., et al.: Learning natural selection through computational thinking: unplugged design of algorithmic explanations. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 56(7), 983–1007 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Puentedura, R.R.: Learning, technology, and the SAMR model: goals, processes, and practice. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/06/29/LearningTechnologySAMRModel.pdf

  26. Tedre, M., et al.: Changing aims of computing education: a historical survey. Comput. Sci. Educ. 28(2), 158–186 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thijs, A., Fisser, P., Van der Hoeven, M.: 21e-eeuwse vaardigheden in het curriculum van het funderend onderwijs [21st century skills in the curriculum of fundamental education] (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM. 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeni, S., Grgurina, N., Hermans, F., Tolboom, J., Barendsen, E.: Exploring teachers’ PCK for computational thinking in context. In: The 16th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 18–21 October 2021 (2021, accepted)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research grant nr. 40.5.18540.153.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nataša Grgurina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grgurina, N., Yeni, S. (2021). Computational Thinking in Context Across Curriculum: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives. In: Barendsen, E., Chytas, C. (eds) Informatics in Schools. Rethinking Computing Education. ISSEP 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13057. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90228-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90228-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90227-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90228-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics