Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ring-Based Identity Based Encryption – Asymptotically Shorter MPK and Tighter Security

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theory of Cryptography (TCC 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 13044))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This work constructs an identity based encryption from the ring learning with errors assumption (RLWE), with shorter master public keys and tighter security analysis. To achieve this, we develop three new methods: (1) a new homomorphic equality test method using nice algebraic structures of the rings, (2) a new family of hash functions with natural homomorphic evaluation algorithms, and (3) a new insight for tighter reduction analyses. These methods can be used to improve other important cryptographic tasks, and thus are of general interests.

Particularly, our homomorphic equality test method can derive a new method for packing/unpacking GSW-style encodings, showing a new non-trivial advantage of RLWE over the plain LWE. Moreover, our new insight for tighter analyses can improve the analyses of all the currently known partition-based IBE designs, achieving the best of the both from prior analytical frameworks of Waters (Eurocrypt ’05) and Bellare and Ristenpart (Eurocrypt ’09).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \(\lambda \) is the security parameter and \(\epsilon \) is the adversary’s advantage in attacking the IBE scheme.

  2. 2.

    There is an unpublished work [4] that achieves essentially the same parameters as scheme II of [39], except [4] has an explicit bound on \(q=O(n^{15.5})\).

  3. 3.

    The plain-LWE schemes usually count how many basic matrices in \(\mathsf {mpk} \), where each matrix is larger than the basic ring vectors of Ring-LWE designs by at least a multiplicative factor of \(O(\lambda )\).

  4. 4.

    We note that \(m^{-1}\) with respect to \(\mathbb {Z}_q\) exists if we choose m and q to be co-prime.

  5. 5.

    We can define the common reference string model, where \(\mathsf {crs} \) is selected according to some sampling algorithm. In this work, the common random string model suffices.

References

  1. Agrawal, S., Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Efficient lattice (H)IBE in the standard model. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 553–572. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_28

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Albrecht, M.R., Player, R., Scott, S.: On the concrete hardness of learning with errors. J. Math. Cryptology. 9(3), 169–203 (2015). https://bitbucket.org/malb/lwe-estimator/src/master/

  3. Alperin-Sheriff, J., Peikert, C.: Faster bootstrapping with polynomial error. In: Garay, J.A., Gennaro, R. (eds.) CRYPTO 2014. LNCS, vol. 8616, pp. 297–314. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44371-2_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Apon, D., Fan, X., Liu, F.-H.: Vector encoding over lattices and its applications. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2017/455 (2017). http://eprint.iacr.org/2017/455

  5. Barrington, D.A.: Bounded-width polynomial-size branching programs recognize exactly those languages in nc1. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 38(1), 150–164 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Beame, P.W., Cook, S.A., Hoover, H.J.: Log depth circuits for division and related problems. SIAM J. Comput. 15(4), 994–1003 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bellare, M., Ristenpart, T.: Simulation without the artificial abort: simplified proof and improved concrete security for waters IBE scheme. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 407–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01001-9_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bitansky, N.: Verifiable random functions from non-interactive witness-indistinguishable proofs. In: Kalai, Y., Reyzin, L. (eds.) TCC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10678, pp. 567–594. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70503-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Efficient selective-id secure identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Secure identity based encryption without random oracles. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 443–459. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28628-8_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Boneh, D., Franklin, M.: Identity-based encryption from the weil pairing. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 213–229. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44647-8_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Boneh, D., et al.: Fully key-homomorphic encryption, arithmetic circuit ABE and compact garbled circuits. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Oswald, E. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2014. LNCS, vol. 8441, pp. 533–556. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55220-5_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Boyen, X., Li, Q.: Towards tightly secure lattice short signature and id-based encryption. In: Cheon, J.H., Takagi, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2016. LNCS, vol. 10032, pp. 404–434. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53890-6_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Brakerski, Z., Lombardi, A., Segev, G., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Anonymous IBE, leakage resilience and circular security from new assumptions. In: Nielsen, J.B., Rijmen, V. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10820, pp. 535–564. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78381-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Brakerski, Z., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Lattice-based FHE as secure as PKE. In: Naor, M. (ed.) ITCS 2014, pp. 1–12. ACM (January 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cash, D., Hofheinz, D., Kiltz, E., Peikert, C.: Bonsai trees, or how to delegate a lattice basis. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 523–552. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheon, J.H., Takagi, T. (eds.): ASIACRYPT 2016. LNCS, vol. 10032. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53890-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Döttling, N., Garg, S.: From selective IBE to Full IBE and selective HIBE. In: Kalai, Y., Reyzin, L. (eds.) TCC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10677, pp. 372–408. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70500-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentry, C.: Practical identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 445–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11761679_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Gentry, C., Peikert, C., Vaikuntanathan, V.: Trapdoors for hard lattices and new cryptographic constructions. In: Ladner, R.E., Dwork, C. (eds.), 40th ACM STOC, pp. 197–206. ACM Press (May 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gentry, C., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Homomorphic encryption from learning with errors: conceptually-simpler, asymptotically-faster, attribute-based. In: Canetti, R., Garay, J.A. (eds.) CRYPTO 2013. LNCS, vol. 8042, pp. 75–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40041-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Gilbert, H. (ed.): EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Gorbunov, S., Vinayagamurthy, D.: Riding on asymmetry: efficient ABE for branching programs. In: Iwata, T., Cheon, J.H. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2015. LNCS, vol. 9452, pp. 550–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48797-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Katsumata, S.: On the untapped potential of encoding predicates by arithmetic circuits and their applications. In: Takagi, T., Peyrin, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10626, pp. 95–125. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70700-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsumata, S., Yamada, S.: Partitioning via non-linear polynomial functions: more compact IBEs from ideal lattices and bilinear maps. In: Cheon, J.H., Takagi, T. (eds.) ASIACRYPT 2016. LNCS, vol. 10032, pp. 682–712. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53890-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Lai, Q., Liu, F.-H., Wang, Z.: Almost tight security in lattices with polynomial moduli – PRF, IBE, all-but-many LTF, and more. In: Kiayias, A., Kohlweiss, M., Wallden, P., Zikas, V. (eds.) PKC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12110, pp. 652–681. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45374-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., Regev, O.: On ideal lattices and learning with errors over rings. In: Gilbert, H. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6110, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., Regev, O.: A toolkit for ring-LWE cryptography. In: Johansson, T., Nguyen, P.Q. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7881, pp. 35–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38348-9_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Micciancio, D., Peikert, C.: Trapdoors for lattices: simpler, tighter, faster, smaller. In: Pointcheval, D., Johansson, T. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7237, pp. 700–718. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29011-4_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Micciancio, D., Walter, M.: On the bit security of cryptographic primitives. In: Nielsen, J.B., Rijmen, V. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10820, pp. 3–28. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78381-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Nielsen, J.B., Rijmen, V. (eds.): EUROCRYPT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10820. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78381-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Regev, O.: On lattices, learning with errors, random linear codes, and cryptography. In: Gabow, H.N., Fagin, R. (eds.), 37th ACM STOC, pp. 84–93. ACM Press (May 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shamir, A.: Identity-based cryptosystems and signature schemes. In: Blakley, G.R., Chaum, D. (eds.) CRYPTO 1984. LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 47–53. Springer, Heidelberg (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39568-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Stehlé, D., Steinfeld, R., Tanaka, K., Xagawa, K.: Efficient public key encryption based on ideal lattices. In: Matsui, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5912, pp. 617–635. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10366-7_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Valiant, L.G., Vazirani, V.V.: NP is as easy as detecting unique solutions. In: 17th ACM STOC, pp. 458–463. ACM Press (May 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Waters, B.: Dual system encryption: realizing fully secure IBE and HIBE under simple assumptions. In: Halevi, S. (ed.) CRYPTO 2009. LNCS, vol. 5677, pp. 619–636. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03356-8_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Waters, B.: Efficient identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11426639_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Yamada, S.: Adaptively secure identity-based encryption from lattices with asymptotically shorter public parameters. In: Fischlin, M., Coron, J.-S. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9666, pp. 32–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49896-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamada, S.: Asymptotically compact adaptively secure lattice IBEs and verifiable random functions via generalized partitioning techniques. In: Katz, J., Shacham, H. (eds.) CRYPTO 2017. LNCS, vol. 10403, pp. 161–193. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63697-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang, J., Chen, Yu., Zhang, Z.: Programmable hash functions from lattices: short signatures and IBEs with small key sizes. In: Robshaw, M., Katz, J. (eds.) CRYPTO 2016. LNCS, vol. 9816, pp. 303–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53015-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers of TCC 2021 for their insightful advices. Feng-Hao Liu and Zhedong Wang are supported by an NSF Award CNS-1657040 and an NSF Career Award CNS-1942400. Part of this work was done while Zhedong Wang was a postdoc at Florida Atlantic University. Parhat Abla and Han Wang are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number NSFC61772516 and the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant Number 2020YFA0712303, and Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program under Grant Number 2019JZZY020127. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Information Security, Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China

    Parhat Abla & Han Wang

  2. School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, China

    Parhat Abla & Han Wang

  3. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA

    Feng-Hao Liu

  4. School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Zhedong Wang

Authors
  1. Parhat Abla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng-Hao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Han Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhedong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Georgetown University, Washington, WA, USA

    Kobbi Nissim

  2. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

    Brent Waters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 International Association for Cryptologic Research

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abla, P., Liu, FH., Wang, H., Wang, Z. (2021). Ring-Based Identity Based Encryption – Asymptotically Shorter MPK and Tighter Security. In: Nissim, K., Waters, B. (eds) Theory of Cryptography. TCC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13044. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90456-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90456-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90455-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90456-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships

Search

Navigation