Skip to main content

Nonlinear Mode Decomposition and Reduced-Order Modeling for Three-Dimensional Cylinder Flow by Distributed Learning on Fugaku

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
High Performance Computing (ISC High Performance 2021)

Abstract

Nonlinear modes of the three-dimensional flow field around a cylinder were extracted by distributed learning on Fugaku. Mode decomposition is an approach used to decompose flow fields into physically important flow structures known as modes. In this study, convolutional neural network-based mode decomposition was applied to the three-dimensional flow field. However, because this process is costly in terms of calculation and memory usage for even a small flow field problem, the enormous computational and memory resources of the supercomputer Fugaku were employed. A hybrid parallelism method combining the distribution of network structure (model parallelism) and the input data (data parallelism) using up to 10,500 nodes on Fugaku was employed for learning. Further, we constructed a reduced-order model to predict the time evolution of latent vector, using the long short-term memory networks. Finally, we compared the reproduced flow field of the model with that of the original full-order model. In addition, we evaluated the execution performance of the learning process. Using a single core memory group, the whole learning process indicates a value of 129.50 GFLOPS being achieved, 7.57% of the single-precision floating-point arithmetic peak performance. Notably, the convolution calculation for backward-propagation achieved 1103.09 GFLOPS, which is 65.39% of the peak. Furthermore, with the weak scaling test, the whole learning process indicates 72.9% with 25,250 nodes (1,212,000 cores) relative to 750 nodes, the sustained performance is 7.8 PFLOPS. In particular, the convolution calculation for backward-propagation indicates a result of 113 PFLOPS (66.2% of the peak performance).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the time of this calculation, Fugaku was not yet in operation.

  2. 2.

    Single-precision is sufficient for precise learning and can increase FLOPS by utilizing the SIMD register.

  3. 3.

    The first two modes, learned by two and 20 mode models, are not the same because if the number of modes when learning is different, the optimal set of modes to reconstruct the energy of the original field are different.

References

  1. Taira, K., et al.: Modal analysis of fluid flows: an overview. AIAA J. 55(12), 4013–4041 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jolliffe, I.T.: Principal Component Analysis, Springer Series in Statistics, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lumley, J.L.: The structure of inhomogeneous turbulent flows. In: Yaglom, A.M., Tatarski, V.I. (Eds.) Atmospheric Turbulence and Wave Propagation, pp. 166–178. Nauka (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L., Berkooz, G., Rowley, C.W.: Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterjee, A.: An introduction to the proper orthogonal decomposition. Curr. Sci. 78(7), 808–817 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berkooz, G., Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L.: The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 25, 539–575 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Taira, K.: Proper orthogonal decomposition in fluid flow analysis: 1 introduction. Nagare 30, 115–124 (2011). (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aubry, N., Holmes, P., Lumley, J.L., Stone, E.: The dynamics of coherent structures in the wall region of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 115–173 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Noack, B.R., Morzynski, M., Tadmor, G.: Reduced-Order Modelling for Flow Control. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Taira, K., et al.: Modal analysis of fluid flows: applications and outlook. AIAA J. 58(3), 998–1022 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, Y., Choi, Y., Widemann, D., Zohdi, T.: Efficient nonlinear manifold reduced order model (2020). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.07727.pdf

  12. Murata, T., Fukami, K., Fukagata, K.: Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 882, A13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.822

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasegawa, K., Fukami, K., Murata, T., Fukagata, K.: Machine-learning-based reduced-order modeling for unsteady flows around bluff bodies of various shapes. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 34(4), 367–383 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hochreiter, S., Schmidhuber, J.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. OLCF: Summit system overview (2018). https://www.olcf.ornl.gov/for-users/system-user-guides/summit/system-overview/

  16. Patton, R.M., et al.: 167-PFlops deep learning for electron microscopy: from learning physics to atomic manipulation. In: SC18: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Dallas, TX, USA, pp. 638–648 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/SC.2018.00053

  17. Kurth, T., et al.: Exascale deep learning for climate analytics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis, SC 2018, p. 51. IEEE Press, NJ, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, L., et al.: Highly-scalable, Physics-Informed GANs for Learning Solutions of Stochastic PDEs. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM Third Workshop on Deep Learning on Supercomputers (DLS), pp. 1–11, November 2019

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jia, W., et al.: Pushing the limit of molecular dynamics with ab initio accuracy to 100 million atoms with machine learning. In: 2020 SC20: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), Atlanta, GA, US, pp. 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/SC41405.2020.00009

  20. Yoshida, T.: Fujitsu high performance CPU for the post-K computer. Hot Chips 30, 1–22 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Specifications Post-K (Fugaku) Information. https://postk-web.r-ccs.riken.jp/spec.html

  22. TOP500.org.: TOP500 Supercomputer Sites (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Post-K (Fugaku) Information. https://postk-web.r-ccs.riken.jp/perf.html

  24. RIKEN: Japan’s Fugaku retains title as the world’s fastest supercomputer. https://www.riken.jp/en/news_pubs/news/2020/20201117_2/index.html

  25. RIKEN Center for Computational Science, Outline of the Development of the Supercomputer Fugaku. https://www.r-ccs.riken.jp/en/fugaku/project/outline

  26. OneAPI Deep Neural Network Library (oneDNN). https://01.org/oneDNN

  27. Deep Neural Network Library for AArch64. https://github.com/fujitsu/dnnl_aarch64

  28. Paszke, A., et al.: Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In: NIPS-W (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jansson, N., Bale, R., Onishi, K., Tsubokura, M.: CUBE: A scalable framework for large-scale industrial simulations. Int. J. High. Perform. Comput. App. 33(4), 678–698 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094342018816377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Onishi, K., Tsubokura, M.: Topology-free immersed boundary method for incompressible turbulence flows: an aerodynamic simulation for “dirty” CAD geometry. Comput. Method Appl. Mech. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113734

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakahashi, K.: Building-cube method for flow problems with broadband characteristic length. In: Armfield, S., Morgan, P., Srinivas, K. (Eds) Computational Fluid Dynamics, 77–81. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59334-5_7

  32. Onishi, K., Obayashi, S., Nakahashi, K., Tsubokura, M.: Use of the immersed boundary method within the building cube method and its application to real vehicle CAD Data. In: 21st AIAA Computational Fluid 1029 Dynamics Conference. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, San Diego, CA (2013). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2713

  33. Peskin, C.S.: The immersed boundary method. Acta. Numerica. 11(1032), 479–517 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492902000077

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Bhalla, A.P.S., Bale, R., Griffith, B.E., Patankar, N.A.: A unified mathematical framework and an adaptive numerical method for fluid-structure interaction with rigid, deforming, and elastic bodies. J. Comput. Phys. 250(1), 446–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.033

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313(5786), 504–507 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Olah, C.: Understanding LSTM Networks. http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/. Accessed 04 Apr 2021

  37. Nakamura, T., Fukami, K., Hasegawa, K., Nabae, Y., Fukagata, K.: Convolutional neural network and long short-term memory based reduced order surrogate for minimal turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 33, 025116 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We sincerely appreciate the advice and support of Prof. Koji Fukagata, Mr. Kai Fukami, and Mr. Takaaki Murata of Keio University. This work used computational resources of the supercomputer Fugaku provided by RIKEN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuto Ando .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ando, K., Onishi, K., Bale, R., Tsubokura, M., Kuroda, A., Minami, K. (2021). Nonlinear Mode Decomposition and Reduced-Order Modeling for Three-Dimensional Cylinder Flow by Distributed Learning on Fugaku. In: Jagode, H., Anzt, H., Ltaief, H., Luszczek, P. (eds) High Performance Computing. ISC High Performance 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90539-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90539-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90538-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90539-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics