Skip to main content

Abstract

The goal of this study is to exploit feedback provided by experts that daily interact with a deep learning based segmentation tool to efficiently improve its segmentation performance. A convolutional neural network (CNN) for segmenting organs at risk for head & neck cancer was implemented in clinical practice and its predicted contours were verified, corrected and approved by the radiation oncologists before being used for treatment planning. A second CNN was subsequently trained to predict how the original contours as created by the first CNN should be adapted according to the experts. Three artificial datasets were created from the clinical dataset by introducing different amounts of systematic errors in the original predictions, in addition to the clinically corrected errors. Dice score for brainstem improved from 88% to 90.5% on average for the dataset that was the least adapted, and from 66% to 89.3% on average for the dataset in which the most systematic errors were introduced. For the clinical dataset, final segmentation improved for glottic area and supraglottic larynx compared to the initial predictions. In general, the systematic errors introduced in the contours are easier to learn compared to the clinical corrections by the expert, which are more subtle and subject to observer variability in our clinical dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brouwer, C.L., et al.: Ct-based delineation of organs at risk in the head and neck region: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, NRG oncology and TROG consensus guidelines. Radiother. Oncol. 117(1), 83–90 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brouwer, C.L., et al.: 3D variation in delineation of head and neck organs at risk. Radiat. Oncol. 7(1), 1–10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardenas, C.E., et al.: Deep learning algorithm for auto-delineation of high-risk oropharyngeal clinical target volumes with built-in dice similarity coefficient parameter optimization function. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. *Biol.* Phys. 101(2), 468–478 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Commowick, O., Grégoire, V., Malandain, G.: Atlas-based delineation of lymph node levels in head and neck computed tomography images. Radiother. Oncol. 87(2), 281–289 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daisne, J.F., Blumhofer, A.: Atlas-based automatic segmentation of head and neck organs at risk and nodal target volumes: a clinical validation. Radiat. Oncol. 8(1), 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Dijk, L.V., et al.: Improving automatic delineation for head and neck organs at risk by deep learning contouring. Radiother. Oncol. 142, 115–123 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibragimov, B., Xing, L.: Segmentation of organs-at-risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks. Med. Phys. 44(2), 547–557 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Men, K., et al.: Fully automatic and robust segmentation of the clinical target volume for radiotherapy of breast cancer using big data and deep learning. Physica Med. 50, 13–19 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mnih, V., et al.: Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602 (2013)

  10. Mukesh, M., et al.: Interobserver variation in clinical target volume and organs at risk segmentation in post-parotidectomy radiotherapy: can segmentation protocols help? Br. J. Radiol. 85(1016), e530–e536 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, T.T., Nguyen, N.D., Nahavandi, S.: Deep reinforcement learning for multiagent systems: a review of challenges, solutions, and applications. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 50(9), 3826–3839 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nikolov, S., et al.: Deep learning to achieve clinically applicable segmentation of head and neck anatomy for radiotherapy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04430 (2018)

  13. Palma, D., et al.: Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of prostate radiotherapy: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. *Biol.* Phys. 72(4), 996–1001 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Piotrowski, T., et al.: Impact of the intra-and inter-observer variability in the delineation of parotid glands on the dose calculation during head and neck helical tomotherapy. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 14(4), 467–474 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ribani, R., Marengoni, M.: A survey of transfer learning for convolutional neural networks. In: 2019 32nd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images Tutorials (SIBGRAPI-T), pp. 47–57. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor, M.E.: Teaching reinforcement learning with Mario: an argument and case study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 AAAI Symposium Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van der Veen, J., Willems, S., Bollen, H., Maes, F., Nuyts, S.: Deep learning for elective neck delineation: more consistent and time efficient. Radiother. Oncol. 153, 180–188 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van der Veen, J., et al.: Benefits of deep learning for delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 138, 68–74 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Willems, S., et al.: Clinical implementation of DeepVoxNet for auto-delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients in radiotherapy. In: Stoyanov, D. (ed.) CARE/CLIP/OR 2.0/ISIC -2018. LNCS, vol. 11041, pp. 223–232. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01201-4_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Wong, J., et al.: Comparing deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk and clinical target volumes to expert inter-observer variability in radiotherapy planning. Radiother. Oncol. 144, 152–158 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Siri Willems and Heleen Bollen are supported by a Ph.D. fellowship of the research foundation - Flanders (FWO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siri Willems .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Willems, S. et al. (2021). Learning from Mistakes: An Error-Driven Mechanism to Improve Segmentation Performance Based on Expert Feedback. In: Oyarzun Laura, C., et al. Clinical Image-Based Procedures, Distributed and Collaborative Learning, Artificial Intelligence for Combating COVID-19 and Secure and Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning. DCL PPML LL-COVID19 CLIP 2021 2021 2021 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12969. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90874-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90874-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90873-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90874-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics