Abstract
Digital intrapreneurs (DIs) act and behave in a similar way to typical digital entrepreneurs without the risk of the venture. Digital Intrapreneurship, however, is under the influence of different organizational factors. This study is meant to focus on the relationship between digital intrapreneurship behavior and the workplace climate—specifically, how the workplace climate can influence DIs’ ability to innovate and exploit digital technologies. Our study revealed that three key workplace climate dimensions play into the formation of digital intrapreneurship behavior: individual, situational and organizational factors. The individual factors are represented by motivations, digital literacy, goals, needs, and the DI’s mindset. The individual factors are affected by the different situational factors that consist of collaborative norms, workplace culture, and group dynamics. The situational factors are in close relationship with organizational factors: mission, core values, and the reward system. The study also concludes that technological factors like digital infrastructure play a key role in the relation of the DI work climate and DI activity enabled said factors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pinchot, G., Soltanifar, M.: Digital Intrapreneurship: The Corporate Solution to a Rapid Digitalisation, pp. 233–262. Springer, Cham (2021)
Reibenspiess, V., Drechsler, K., Eckhardt, A., Wagner, H.T.: Tapping into the wealth of employees’ ideas: design principles for a digital intrapreneurship platform. Inf. Manage. 1, 103287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103287
Soltanifar, M., Hughes, M.: Digital Entrepreneurship: Impact on Business and Society. Springer, Cham (2005)
Opland, .L., Jaccheri, L., Pappas, I.O., Engesmo, J.: Utilising the innovation potential-a systematic literature review on employee-driven digital innovation. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2020)
Vassilakopoulou, P., Grisot, M.: Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: a process model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 29, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101617
Seshadri, D.V.R., Tripathy, A.: Innovation through intrapreneurship: the road less travelled. Vikalpa 31, 17–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920060102
Young, R., Wahlberg, L., Davis, E., Abhari, K.: Towards a theory of digital entrepreneurship mindset : the role of digital learning aptitude and digital literacy. In: AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, pp 1–10 (2020)
Pinchot, G.: The Pinchot Perspective. In: Pinchot.com (2013). http://www.pinchot.com/
Echebiri, C., Amundsen, S., Engen, M.: Linking structural empowerment to employee-driven innovation: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Adm. Sci. 10, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030042
Barroso, D.B.R., et al.: stakeholder perception in the organizational environment focusing on behavior. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 5, 44–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.2.5
Baptista, J., et al.: Digital work and organisational transformation: emergent digital/human work configurations in modern organisations. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 29, 101618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101618
Honig, B., Samuelsson, M.: Business planning by intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs under environmental uncertainty and institutional pressure. Technovation 99, 102124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102124
Homans, G.C.: Social Behavior as Exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63, 597–606 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1086/222355
Climer, A.: Seven Norms of Collaboration (2015)
Gençer, H.: Group dynamics and behaviour. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 7, 223–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070128
Feisal, F.: Corporate innovation: democratizing decision-making. In: Noviaristanti, S., Hanafi, H.M., Trihanondo, D. (eds.) Understanding Digital Industry, pp. 18–19. Routledge (2020). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367814557-6
Amaechi, E.: Understanding culture and success in global business: developing cultural and innovative intrapreneurs in small businesses. In: Thakkar, B.S. (ed.) Culture in Global Businesses: Addressing National and Organizational Challenges, pp. 205–224. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60296-3_9
Cnossen, B., Loots, E., van Witteloostuijn, A.: Individual motivation among entrepreneurs in the creative and cultural industries: a self-determination perspective. Creat. Innov. Manage. 28, 389–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12315
Schlaegel, C., Engle, R.L., Richter, N.F., Taureck, P.C.: Personal factors, entrepreneurial intention, and entrepreneurial status: a multinational study in three institutional environments. J. Int. Entrep. 25, 1–42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00287-7
Nambisan, S.: Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 41, 1029–1055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
Martiarena, A.: What’s so entrepreneurial about intrapreneurs? Small Bus. Econ. 40, 27–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-93481-1
Koe, W.-L.: The motivation to adopt e-commerce among Malaysian entrepreneurs. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 11(1), 189–202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2020.11.30
Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)
ALA: Report of the ALA Special Task Force on Digital Literacy (2017)
Abhari, M., Abhari, K.: Ambient intelligence applications in architecture: factors affecting adoption decisions. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) FICC 2020. AISC, vol. 1129, pp. 235–250. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39445-5_18
Choon, T.T., Patrick, K.C.: The impact of goal setting on employee effectiveness to improve organisation effectiveness: empirical study of a high-tech company in Singapore. J. Bus. Econ. Policy 3, 1–16 (2016)
Njoroge, N., Yazdanifard, R.: The impact of social and emotional intelligence on employee motivation in a multigenerational workplace. Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manage. 6, 163 (2014)
Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory/Albert Bandura, Vol. 16, pp. 2–9, 617. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1986)
Wood, R., Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of organizational management university of New South Wales. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 361–384 (1989)
Bandura, A.: Social learning theory, pp. 1–46 (1971)
Bandura, A.: Social learning theory. Gr. Organ. Stud. 2, 384–385 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
Bäckström, I., Bengtsson, L.: A mapping study of employee innovation: proposing a research agenda. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 22, 468–492 (2019)
Shahi, C., Sinha, M.: Digital transformation: challenges faced by organizations and their potential solutions. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 13, 17–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2020-0157
Luthans, F., Stajkovic, A.D.: Reinforce for performance: the need to go beyond pay and even rewards. Acad. Manage. Exec. 13, 49–57 (1999). https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899548
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ortiz Sandoval, I.D., Tehiva, T., Parsons, M., Abhari, K. (2021). Digital Intrapreneurship: A Work Climate Perspective. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: HCI Applications in Health, Transport, and Industry. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13097. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90965-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90966-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)