Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 13097))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1566 Accesses

Abstract

Digital intrapreneurs (DIs) act and behave in a similar way to typical digital entrepreneurs without the risk of the venture. Digital Intrapreneurship, however, is under the influence of different organizational factors. This study is meant to focus on the relationship between digital intrapreneurship behavior and the workplace climate—specifically, how the workplace climate can influence DIs’ ability to innovate and exploit digital technologies. Our study revealed that three key workplace climate dimensions play into the formation of digital intrapreneurship behavior: individual, situational and organizational factors. The individual factors are represented by motivations, digital literacy, goals, needs, and the DI’s mindset. The individual factors are affected by the different situational factors that consist of collaborative norms, workplace culture, and group dynamics. The situational factors are in close relationship with organizational factors: mission, core values, and the reward system. The study also concludes that technological factors like digital infrastructure play a key role in the relation of the DI work climate and DI activity enabled said factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pinchot, G., Soltanifar, M.: Digital Intrapreneurship: The Corporate Solution to a Rapid Digitalisation, pp. 233–262. Springer, Cham (2021)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Reibenspiess, V., Drechsler, K., Eckhardt, A., Wagner, H.T.: Tapping into the wealth of employees’ ideas: design principles for a digital intrapreneurship platform. Inf. Manage. 1, 103287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Soltanifar, M., Hughes, M.: Digital Entrepreneurship: Impact on Business and Society. Springer, Cham (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Opland, .L., Jaccheri, L., Pappas, I.O., Engesmo, J.: Utilising the innovation potential-a systematic literature review on employee-driven digital innovation. In: European Conference on Information Systems (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Vassilakopoulou, P., Grisot, M.: Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: a process model. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 29, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seshadri, D.V.R., Tripathy, A.: Innovation through intrapreneurship: the road less travelled. Vikalpa 31, 17–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920060102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Young, R., Wahlberg, L., Davis, E., Abhari, K.: Towards a theory of digital entrepreneurship mindset : the role of digital learning aptitude and digital literacy. In: AMCIS 2020 Proceedings, pp 1–10 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pinchot, G.: The Pinchot Perspective. In: Pinchot.com (2013). http://www.pinchot.com/

  9. Echebiri, C., Amundsen, S., Engen, M.: Linking structural empowerment to employee-driven innovation: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Adm. Sci. 10, 42 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barroso, D.B.R., et al.: stakeholder perception in the organizational environment focusing on behavior. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Sci. 5, 44–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.2.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Baptista, J., et al.: Digital work and organisational transformation: emergent digital/human work configurations in modern organisations. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 29, 101618 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Honig, B., Samuelsson, M.: Business planning by intrapreneurs and entrepreneurs under environmental uncertainty and institutional pressure. Technovation 99, 102124 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Homans, G.C.: Social Behavior as Exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63, 597–606 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1086/222355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Climer, A.: Seven Norms of Collaboration (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gençer, H.: Group dynamics and behaviour. Univ. J. Educ. Res. 7, 223–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Feisal, F.: Corporate innovation: democratizing decision-making. In: Noviaristanti, S., Hanafi, H.M., Trihanondo, D. (eds.) Understanding Digital Industry, pp. 18–19. Routledge (2020). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367814557-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Amaechi, E.: Understanding culture and success in global business: developing cultural and innovative intrapreneurs in small businesses. In: Thakkar, B.S. (ed.) Culture in Global Businesses: Addressing National and Organizational Challenges, pp. 205–224. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60296-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Cnossen, B., Loots, E., van Witteloostuijn, A.: Individual motivation among entrepreneurs in the creative and cultural industries: a self-determination perspective. Creat. Innov. Manage. 28, 389–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schlaegel, C., Engle, R.L., Richter, N.F., Taureck, P.C.: Personal factors, entrepreneurial intention, and entrepreneurial status: a multinational study in three institutional environments. J. Int. Entrep. 25, 1–42 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-021-00287-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nambisan, S.: Digital entrepreneurship: toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 41, 1029–1055 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martiarena, A.: What’s so entrepreneurial about intrapreneurs? Small Bus. Econ. 40, 27–39 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-93481-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koe, W.-L.: The motivation to adopt e-commerce among Malaysian entrepreneurs. Organ. Mark. Emerg. Econ. 11(1), 189–202 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2020.11.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55, 68–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. ALA: Report of the ALA Special Task Force on Digital Literacy (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abhari, M., Abhari, K.: Ambient intelligence applications in architecture: factors affecting adoption decisions. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) FICC 2020. AISC, vol. 1129, pp. 235–250. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39445-5_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Choon, T.T., Patrick, K.C.: The impact of goal setting on employee effectiveness to improve organisation effectiveness: empirical study of a high-tech company in Singapore. J. Bus. Econ. Policy 3, 1–16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Njoroge, N., Yazdanifard, R.: The impact of social and emotional intelligence on employee motivation in a multigenerational workplace. Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manage. 6, 163 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory/Albert Bandura, Vol. 16, pp. 2–9, 617. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wood, R., Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of organizational management university of New South Wales. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14, 361–384 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bandura, A.: Social learning theory, pp. 1–46 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bandura, A.: Social learning theory. Gr. Organ. Stud. 2, 384–385 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bäckström, I., Bengtsson, L.: A mapping study of employee innovation: proposing a research agenda. Eur. J. Innov. Manage. 22, 468–492 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shahi, C., Sinha, M.: Digital transformation: challenges faced by organizations and their potential solutions. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 13, 17–33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2020-0157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Luthans, F., Stajkovic, A.D.: Reinforce for performance: the need to go beyond pay and even rewards. Acad. Manage. Exec. 13, 49–57 (1999). https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.1899548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaveh Abhari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ortiz Sandoval, I.D., Tehiva, T., Parsons, M., Abhari, K. (2021). Digital Intrapreneurship: A Work Climate Perspective. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. HCI International 2021 - Late Breaking Papers: HCI Applications in Health, Transport, and Industry. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13097. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90965-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90966-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics