Skip to main content

Improve University Humanities Students’ Problem-Solving Ability Through Computational Thinking Training

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2021)

Abstract

Humanities students are often considered to have lower problem solving ability and information application skills. This may be due to the fact that many humanities students receive basic computer education that only teaches word processing or other information software. In this paper, we want to investigate whether university humanities students’ problem-solving ability could be improved through the computational thinking (CT) training. The experiment was divided into 2 phases. The first phase was to investigate whether the students’ problem solving abilities could be affected by the CT education comparing with the training of MS-Office operating skills adopted in the traditional “Introduction to Computers” course. The result of this investigation showed that the experimental group received the CT training had significantly better achievement than the control group in both problem-solving ability and IT application ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wing, J.M.: Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 366(1881), 3717–3725 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aho, A.V.: Computation and computational thinking. Comput. J. 55(7), 832–835 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barr, V., Stephenson, C.: Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads 2(1), 48–54 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sengupta, P., Kinnebrew, J.S., Basu, S., Biswas, G., Clark, D.: Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: a theoretical framework. Educ. Inf. Technol. 18(2), 351–380 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Korkmaz, O., Çakir, R., Ozden, M.Y.: A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 558–569 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Selby, C., Woollard, J.: Computational thinking: the developing definitions. In: 45th ACM Technical Symposium Proceedings on Computer Science Education. ACM, Canterbury (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, L., Nouri, J.: A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Comput. Educ. 141, 103607 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Google Computational Thinking for Educators. https://computationalthinkingcourse.withgoogle.com. Accessed 10 Sept 2021

  10. Bitesize Introduction to computational thinking. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zp92mp3/revision/1. Accessed 10 Sept 2021

  11. Taiwan MOE Computational thinking in Taiwan. http://compthinking.csie.ntnu.edu.tw/. Accessed 10 Sept 2021

  12. Computational thinking for K12. https://ctfork12.ice.ntnu.edu.tw/conception.html. Accessed 10 Sept 2021

  13. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.C., Jiménez-Fernández, C.: Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the computational thinking test. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 678–691 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tukey, J.W.: Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison Wesley, MA (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jim-Min Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lin, JM., Hong, ZW., Song, ZK., Shen, WW., Cheng, WK. (2021). Improve University Humanities Students’ Problem-Solving Ability Through Computational Thinking Training. In: Huang, YM., Lai, CF., Rocha, T. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13117. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91540-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91539-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91540-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics