Skip to main content

Optimal Sensor Placement by Distribution Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Intelligent Optimization (LION 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12931))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

The optimal sensor placement problem arises in many contexts for the identification of optimal “sensing spots”, within a network, for monitoring the spread of “effects” triggered by “events”. There are usually different and conflicting objectives as cost, time and reliability of the detection In this paper sensor placement (SP) (i.e., location of sensors at some nodes) for the early detection of contaminants in water distribution networks (WDNs) will be used as a running example. The best trade-off between the objectives can be defined in terms of Pareto optimality.

The evaluation of the objective functions requires the execution of a simulation model: to organize the simulation results in a computationally efficient way we propose a data structure collecting simulation outcomes for every SP which is particularly suitable for visualization of the dynamics of contaminant concentration and evolutionary optimization.

In this paper we model the sensor placement problem as a multi objective optimization problem with boolean decision variables and propose a Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithm (MOEA) for approximating and analyzing the Pareto set.

The key element is the definition of information spaces, in which a candidate placement can be represented as a matrix or, in probabilistic terms as a histogram.

The introduction of a distance between histograms, namely the Wasserstein (WST) distance, enables to derive new genetic operators: the new algorithm MOEA/WST has been tested on a benchmark problem and a real world network. The computational metrics used are hypervolume and coverage: their values are compared with NSGA-II’s in terms of the number of generations.

The experiments offer evidence of a good relative performance of MOEA/WST in particular for relatively large networks and low generation counts.

The computational analysis has been limited in this paper to WDNs but the key aspect of the method, that is the representation of feasible solutions as histograms, is suitable for problems as the detection of “fake-news” on the web where the problem is to identify a small set of blogs which catch as many cascades as early as possible and more generally Multi-objective simulation optimization problems which are also amenable to the probabilistic representation of feasible solutions as histograms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Boginski, V.L., Commander, C.W., Pardalos, P.M., Ye, Y.: Sensors: Theory, Algorithms, and Applications. Springer, New York (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88619-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mallozzi, L., D’Amato, E., Pardalos, P.M.: Spatial Interaction Models. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52654-6

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Myburgh, C.: A population-based fast algorithm for a billion-dimensional resource allocation problem with integer variables. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261, 460–474 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Vesikar, Y., Deb, K., Blank, J.: Reference point based NSGA-III for preferred solutions. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 1587–1594. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y., van Stein, B., Bäck, T., Emmerich, M.: A tailored NSGA-III for multi-objective flexible job shop scheduling. In: 2020 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), pp. 2746–2753. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Knowles, J.D.: ParEGO: a hybrid algorithm with on-line landscape approximation for expensive multiobjective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 10, 50–66 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2005.851274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Q., Liu, W., Tsang, E.P.K., Virginas, B.: Expensive multiobjective optimization by MOEA/D with Gaussian process model. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14, 456–474 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2009.2033671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schieber, T.A., Carpi, L., Díaz-Guilera, A., Pardalos, P.M., Masoller, C., Ravetti, M.G.: Quantification of network structural dissimilarities. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Monge, G.: Mémoire sur la théorie des déblais et des remblais. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences de Paris (1781)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kantorovich, L.: On the transfer of masses. In: Doklady Akademii Nauk, pp. 227–229 (1942). (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bonneel, N., Peyré, G., Cuturi, M.: Wasserstein barycentric coordinates: histogram regression using optimal transport. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 71–81 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang, G., Quo, C., Kusner, M.J., Sun, Y., Weinberger, K.Q., Sha, F.: Supervised word mover’s distance. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 4869–4877 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Weng, L.: From GAN to WGAN. arXiv preprint arXiv:190408994 (2019)

  14. Villani, C.: Optimal Transport: Old and New. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9

  15. Peyré, G., Cuturi, M.: Computational optimal transport: with applications to data science. Found. Trends® Mach. Learn. 11, 355–607 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peyré, G., Cuturi, M.: Computational optimal transport. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 11, 355–607 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1561/2200000073

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, M., Yao, X.: Quality evaluation of solution sets in multiobjective optimisation: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 52, 1–38 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fleischer, M.: The measure of Pareto optima applications to multi-objective metaheuristics. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Deb, K. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 519–533. Springer, Heidelberg (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36970-8_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.T.M.: SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181, 1653–1669 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.08.008

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang, K., Emmerich, M., Deutz, A., Bäck, T.: Multi-objective Bayesian global optimization using expected hypervolume improvement gradient. Swarm Evol. Comput. 44, 945–956 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pele, O., Werman, M.: Fast and robust earth mover’s distances. In: 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 460–467. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Atasu, K., Mittelholzer, T.: Linear-complexity data-parallel earth mover’s distance approximations. In: Chaudhuri, K., Salakhutdinov, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, Long Beach, California, USA, 9–15 June 2019, pp. 364–373. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shirdhonkar, S., Jacobs, D.W.: Approximate earth mover’s distance in linear time. In: 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klise, K.A., Murray, R., Haxton, T.: An Overview of the Water Network Tool for Resilience (WNTR) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vasan, A., Simonovic, S.P.: Optimization of water distribution network design using differential evolution. J. Water Res. Plan. Manage. 136, 279–287 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khuller, S., Moss, A., Naor, J.S.: The budgeted maximum coverage problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 70, 39–45 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study has been partially supported by the Italian project “PERFORM-WATER 2030” – programma POR (Programma Operativo Regionale) FESR (Fondo Europeo di Sviluppo Regionale) 2014–2020, innovation call “Accordi per la Ricerca e l’Innovazione” (“Agreements for Research and Innovation”) of Regione Lombardia, (DGR N. 5245/2016 - AZIONE I.1.B.1.3 – ASSE I POR FESR 2014–2020) – CUP E46D17000120009.This study has also been partially supported by the Italian project ENERGIDRICA co-financed by MIUR.We greatly acknowledge the DEMS Data Science Lab for supporting this work by providing computational resources (DEMS – Department of Economics, Management and Statistics).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Candelieri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ponti, A., Candelieri, A., Archetti, F. (2021). Optimal Sensor Placement by Distribution Based Multiobjective Evolutionary Optimization. In: Simos, D.E., Pardalos, P.M., Kotsireas, I.S. (eds) Learning and Intelligent Optimization. LION 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12931. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92121-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92121-7_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92120-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92121-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics