Abstract
The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of university teachers’ attitudes toward gamification. A broader goal is to lay the groundwork for a better understanding of how university teachers gaming habits and preferences might be leveraged in efforts to introduce gamification in Higher Education (HE). Building on previous research, showing no differences in teachers’ attitudes towards gamification by age, gender or type of institution (public or private), this exploratory study tries to assess whether teachers’ level of familiarity with games may have an influence on their attitudes and their expectations about the use of a gamified approach in a Higher Education course. The data were collected through focus groups, involving 13 teachers all in-service in a private Italian university, and were analysed through qualitative content analysis. Participants were divided into three groups according to their playing habits and preferences (well-rounded gamers, casual gamers and non-gamers). Results show that, even though the participants’ overall attitude towards gamification was favourable, there were some differences between the three groups. For instance, teachers in the “well-rounded gamers” group expressed the highest level of concern about the possible negative effects of the use of gamification in HE, while “casual gamers” and “non-gamers” seemed to be less cautious and more focused on the possible advantages of a gamified educational strategy. “Non-gamers” were the group more concerned about the time and guidance needed to really be able to use this new pedagogical approach in their courses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Schnitzler, K., Holzberger, D., Seidel, T.: All better than being disengaged: student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 36(3), 627–652 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00500-6
Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., et al.: Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learn. Instr. 63, 101217 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217
Christenson, S.L., Wylie, C., Reschly, A.L.: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (2012)
Dixson, M.D.: Measuring student engagement in the online course: the online student engagement scale (OSE). Section II: Faculty Attitudes and Student Engagement. Report (2015). Online Learn. J. 19, 143
Robinson, C.C., Hullinger, H.: New benchmarks in higher education: student engagement in online learning. J. Educ. Bus. 84(2), 101–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.84.2.101-109
Hughes, J.N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.M., Loyd, L.K.: Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: a 3-year longitudinal study. J. Educ. Psychol. 100(1), 1–14 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1
Finn, J.D., Rock, D.A.: Academic success among students at risk for school failure. J. Appl. Psychol. 82(2), 221–234 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.221
Finn, J.D.: Withdrawing from school. Rev. Educ. Res. 59(2), 117–142 (1989). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
Finn, K.V., Frone, M.R.: Academic performance and cheating: moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. J. Educ. Res. 97(3), 115–121 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121
Deterding, S.: Situated motivational affordances of game elements: a conceptual model, pp. 3–6 (2011)
Contreras-Espinosa, R.S., Eguia Gomez, J.L.: How could the use of game elements help students’ affective and cognitive engagement during game play? J. Inf. Technol. Res. 13(1), 17–29 (2020). https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2020010102
Majuri, J., Koivisto, J., Hamari, J.: Gamification of education and learning: a review of empirical literature. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2186, pp. 11–19 (2018)
Xi, N., Hamari, J.: Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 46, 210–221 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.12.002
Ab Rahman, R., Ahmad, S., Hashim, U.R.: The effectiveness of gamification technique for higher education students engagement in polytechnic Muadzam. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 15, 1–16 (2018)
Alsawaier, R.S.: The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. Int. J. Inf. Learn. Technol. 35(1), 56–79 (2018)
Campillo-Ferrer, J.M., Miralles-Martínez, P., Sánchez-Ibáñez, R.: Gamification in higher education: impact on student motivation and the acquisition of social and civic key competencies. Sustainability 12, 4822 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12124822
Dicheva, D., Irwin, K., Dichev, C.: Exploring learners experience of gamified practicing: for learning or for fun? Int. J. Serious Games 6, 5–21 (2019)
Huang, B., Hew, K.F., Lo, C.K.: Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interact. Learn. Environ. 27(8), 1106–1126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653
Lopes, R.P.: An award system for gamification in higher education. In: 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (2014)
Sánchez-Martín, J., Cañada-Cañada, F., Dávila-Acedo, M.A.: Just a game? Gamifying a general science class at university: collaborative and competitive work implications. Think. Skills Creat. 26, 51–59 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.05.003
Kovácsné Pusztai, K.: Gamification in higher education. Teach. Math. Comput. Sci. 18, 87–106 (2021). https://doi.org/10.5485/tmcs.2020.0510
Glover, I.: Play as you learn: gamification as a technique for motivating learners. In: Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telemcommunications (2013)
Prensky, M.: Don’t Bother Me Mom: I’m Learning: How Computer and Video Games are Preparing Your Kids for 21st Century Success and How You Can Help. St Paul: Paragon House, Minnesota (2003)
Teo, T.: Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: a Singapore survey. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. (2008). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1201
Ketelhut, D.J., Schifter, C.C.: Teachers and game-based learning: improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption. Comput. Educ. 56(2), 539–546 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.002
Asiri, M.J.: Do teachers’ attitudes, perception of usefulness, and perceived social influences predict their behavioral intentions to use gamification in EFL classrooms? Evidence from the middle east. Int. J. Educ. Pract. 7(3), 112–122 (2019). https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.112.122
Martí-Parreño, J., Seguí-Mas, D., Seguí-Mas, E.: Teachers’ attitude towards and actual use of gamification. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 228, 682–688 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.104
Browne, K., Anand, C., Gosse, E.: Gamification and serious game approaches for adult literacy tablet software. Entertain. Comput. 5(3), 135–146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2014.04.003
Chung, C.H., Shen, C., Qiu, Y.Z.: Students’ acceptance of gamification in higher education. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 9(2), 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019040101
Entertainment Software Association: 2020 Essential Facts About the Video Game Industry. Cision, pp. 1–2 (2020)
ISFE: Europe Video Game Industry Key Facts 2020, pp. 1–20 (2020)
Manero, B., Torrente, J., Freire, M., Fernández-Manjón, B.: An instrument to build a gamer clustering framework according to gaming preferences and habits. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 353–363 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.085
Weber, R.P.: Basic Content Analysis, 2nd edn (1990)
Shelley, M., Krippendorff, K.: Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2288384
Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15, 1277–1288 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Bardin, L.: L’analyse de contenu (2013)
Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J.: Gamification in higher education: teachers’ drivers and barriers. In: ICFE (2016)
Blume, C.: Games people (don’t) play: an analysis of pre-service EFL teachers’ behaviors and beliefs regarding digital game-based language learning. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 33, 109–132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552599
Mumtaz, S.: Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Educ. 9(3), 319–342 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
Ohrnberger, M.: The gamer generation teaches school: the gaming practices and attitudes towards technology of pre-service teachers. J. Technol. Teach. Educ. 21, 153–177 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marinensi, G., Romero Carbonell, M. (2021). Exploring Higher Education Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Gamification. In: de Rosa, F., Marfisi Schottman, I., Baalsrud Hauge, J., Bellotti, F., Dondio, P., Romero, M. (eds) Games and Learning Alliance. GALA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92182-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92182-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92181-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92182-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)