Skip to main content

Malingering Scraper: A Novel Framework to Reconstruct Honest Profiles from Malingerer Psychopathological Tests

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2021)

Abstract

Malingered responses to psychological testing are frequent when monetary incentives or other forms of rewards are at stake. Psychological symptoms are usually identified through clinical questionnaires which, however, may be easily inflated by malingered responses (fake-bad). A fake-bad response style is usually identified through specialized scales embedded in the personality questionnaires, but no procedure is currently available that reconstructs honest responses from malingered responses.

In this paper, we present a technique for the Millon (MCMI-III) questionnaire a widely used test for investigating psychopathology. This technique detects malingered MCMI-III profiles (malingering detector) and removes the intentionally inflated test results (malingering remover). We demonstrate that by applying machine learning to the validity scales of MCMI-III we can discriminate between malingerer and honest profiles with 90% accuracy. Moreover, our results show that by applying regression models to malingerer tests, we are able to well reconstruct the original honest profile. Our models decrease the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of the reconstruction up to 19% compared to base correction procedures. Finally, applying the malingering detector to the reconstructed scales, we show that only 9% were classified as malingerers, demonstrating the validity of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyd, S., Cortes, C., Mohri, M., Radovanovic, A.: Accuracy at the top. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 953–961 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daubert, S.D., Metzler, A.E.: The detection of fake-bad and fake-good responding on the millon clinical multiaxial inventory III. Psychol. Assess. 12(4), 418 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher, A.J., Medaglia, J.D., Jeronimus, B.F.: Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(27), E6106–E6115 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mazza, C., et al.: Indicators to distinguish symptom accentuators from symptom producers in individuals with a diagnosed adjustment disorder: A pilot study on inconsistency subtypes using sims and MMPI-2-RF. PLoS ONE 14(12), e0227113 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Merten, T., Merckelbach, H.: Symptom validity testing in somatoform and dissociative disorders: a critical review. Psychol. Injury Law 6(2), 122–137 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Millon, T., Davis, R.D.: The mcmi-iii: present and future directions. J. Pers. Assess. 68(1), 69–85 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Organization, W.H., et al.: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Weekly Epidemiol. Rec. = Relevé épidémiologique hebdomadaire 67(30), 227–227 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orrù, G., Mazza, C., Monaro, M., Ferracuti, S., Sartori, G., Roma, P.: The development of a short version of the sims using machine learning to detect feigning in forensic assessment. Psychol. Injury Law 14, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09389-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen, G.M., Phillips, W.R.: A cautionary lesson from simulated patients. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 32(2), 132–133 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sartori, G., Zangrossi, A., Orrù, G., Monaro, M.: Detection of malingering in psychic damage ascertainment. In: Ferrara, S.D. (ed.) P5 Medicine and Justice, pp. 330–341. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, G.P., Burger, G.K.: Detection of malingering: validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 25(2), 183–189 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tracy, D.K., Rix, K.J.: Malingering mental disorders: clinical assessment. BJPsych Adv. 23(1), 27–35 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Merten, T.: The structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neuropsychol. 28(8), 1336–1365 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vrij, A.: Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and Implications for Professional Practice. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zennaro, A., Ferracuti, S., Lang, M., Sanavio, E.: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III [MCMI-III Italian Adaptation]. Giunti OS, Firenze (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Cardaioli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cardaioli, M., Cecconello, S., Monaro, M., Sartori, G., Conti, M., Orrù, G. (2021). Malingering Scraper: A Novel Framework to Reconstruct Honest Profiles from Malingerer Psychopathological Tests. In: Mantoro, T., Lee, M., Ayu, M.A., Wong, K.W., Hidayanto, A.N. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_50

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_50

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92309-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92310-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics