Abstract
Malingered responses to psychological testing are frequent when monetary incentives or other forms of rewards are at stake. Psychological symptoms are usually identified through clinical questionnaires which, however, may be easily inflated by malingered responses (fake-bad). A fake-bad response style is usually identified through specialized scales embedded in the personality questionnaires, but no procedure is currently available that reconstructs honest responses from malingered responses.
In this paper, we present a technique for the Millon (MCMI-III) questionnaire a widely used test for investigating psychopathology. This technique detects malingered MCMI-III profiles (malingering detector) and removes the intentionally inflated test results (malingering remover). We demonstrate that by applying machine learning to the validity scales of MCMI-III we can discriminate between malingerer and honest profiles with 90% accuracy. Moreover, our results show that by applying regression models to malingerer tests, we are able to well reconstruct the original honest profile. Our models decrease the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of the reconstruction up to 19% compared to base correction procedures. Finally, applying the malingering detector to the reconstructed scales, we show that only 9% were classified as malingerers, demonstrating the validity of the proposed approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub (2013)
Boyd, S., Cortes, C., Mohri, M., Radovanovic, A.: Accuracy at the top. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 953–961 (2012)
Daubert, S.D., Metzler, A.E.: The detection of fake-bad and fake-good responding on the millon clinical multiaxial inventory III. Psychol. Assess. 12(4), 418 (2000)
Fisher, A.J., Medaglia, J.D., Jeronimus, B.F.: Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(27), E6106–E6115 (2018)
Mazza, C., et al.: Indicators to distinguish symptom accentuators from symptom producers in individuals with a diagnosed adjustment disorder: A pilot study on inconsistency subtypes using sims and MMPI-2-RF. PLoS ONE 14(12), e0227113 (2019)
Merten, T., Merckelbach, H.: Symptom validity testing in somatoform and dissociative disorders: a critical review. Psychol. Injury Law 6(2), 122–137 (2013)
Millon, T., Davis, R.D.: The mcmi-iii: present and future directions. J. Pers. Assess. 68(1), 69–85 (1997)
Organization, W.H., et al.: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines. Weekly Epidemiol. Rec. = Relevé épidémiologique hebdomadaire 67(30), 227–227 (1992)
Orrù, G., Mazza, C., Monaro, M., Ferracuti, S., Sartori, G., Roma, P.: The development of a short version of the sims using machine learning to detect feigning in forensic assessment. Psychol. Injury Law 14, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09389-4
Rosen, G.M., Phillips, W.R.: A cautionary lesson from simulated patients. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 32(2), 132–133 (2004)
Sartori, G., Zangrossi, A., Orrù, G., Monaro, M.: Detection of malingering in psychic damage ascertainment. In: Ferrara, S.D. (ed.) P5 Medicine and Justice, pp. 330–341. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_21
Smith, G.P., Burger, G.K.: Detection of malingering: validation of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS). J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 25(2), 183–189 (1997)
Tracy, D.K., Rix, K.J.: Malingering mental disorders: clinical assessment. BJPsych Adv. 23(1), 27–35 (2017)
Van Impelen, A., Merckelbach, H., Jelicic, M., Merten, T.: The structured inventory of malingered symptomatology (SIMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Neuropsychol. 28(8), 1336–1365 (2014)
Vrij, A.: Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and Implications for Professional Practice. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)
Zennaro, A., Ferracuti, S., Lang, M., Sanavio, E.: Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III [MCMI-III Italian Adaptation]. Giunti OS, Firenze (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cardaioli, M., Cecconello, S., Monaro, M., Sartori, G., Conti, M., Orrù, G. (2021). Malingering Scraper: A Novel Framework to Reconstruct Honest Profiles from Malingerer Psychopathological Tests. In: Mantoro, T., Lee, M., Ayu, M.A., Wong, K.W., Hidayanto, A.N. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1517. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_50
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92310-5_50
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92309-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92310-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)