Abstract
Neurosurgical procedures often involve local skull bone removal to combat specific pathologies. Defect covering is mandatory in most cases and usually requires the application of bespoke and synthetically engineered implants. Since manufacturing management faces several barriers in the design, fabrication, and application process, there is an unmet need for improvement. In this article, the authors review the background of skull bone removal and calvarial reconstruction techniques, highlight the challenges on the horizon, and investigate future pathways.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sundseth, J., Sundseth, A., Berg-Johnsen, J., Sorteberg, W., Lindegaard, K.F.: Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection. Acta neurochirurgica 156(4), 805–811 (2014). Discussion 11
Shah, A.M., Jung, H., Skirboll, S.: Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis. Neurosurg. Focus 36(4), E19 (2014)
Changa, A.R., Czeisler, B.M., Lord, A.S.: Management of elevated intracranial pressure: a review. Current Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 19(12), 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-1010-3
Jabbarli, R., et al.: Size does matter: the role of decompressive craniectomy extent for outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Eur. J. Neurol. 28(7), 2200–2207 (2021)
Wilson, M.H.: Monro-Kellie 2.0: the dynamic vascular and venous pathophysiological components of intracranial pressure. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 36(8), 1338–1350 (2016). Official Journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Nakamura, H., Wang, H., Westesson, P.L., Hoshikawa, M., Takagi, M., Nakajima, Y.: Intraosseous tumors of the skull. Pic. Rev. Neuroradiol. J. 25(4), 461–468 (2012)
Haldar, R., Kaushal, A., Gupta, D., Srivastava, S., Singh, P.K.: Pain following craniotomy: reassessment of the available options. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 509164 (2015)
Di Rienzo, A., et al.: Sinking flap syndrome revisited: the who, when and why. Neurosurg. Rev. 43(1), 323–335 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01148-7
Piitulainen, J.M., Kauko, T., Aitasalo, K.M., Vuorinen, V., Vallittu, P.K., Posti, J.P.: Outcomes of cranioplasty with synthetic materials and autologous bone grafts. World Neurosurg. 83(5), 708–714 (2015)
Bonda, D.J., Manjila, S., Selman, W.R., Dean, D.: The recent revolution in the design and manufacture of cranial implants: modern advancements and future directions. Neurosurgery 77(5), 814–24 (2015). Discussion 24
Aydin, S., Kucukyuruk, B., Abuzayed, B., Aydin, S., Sanus, G.Z.: Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J. Neurosci. Rural Pract. 2(2), 162–167 (2011)
von Campe, G., Pistracher, K.: Patient specific implants (PSI). In: Li, J., Egger, J. (eds.) AutoImplant 2020. LNCS, vol. 12439, pp. 1–9. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64327-0_1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rauschenbach, L., Rieß, C., Sure, U., Wrede, K.H. (2021). Personalized Calvarial Reconstruction in Neurosurgery. In: Li, J., Egger, J. (eds) Towards the Automatization of Cranial Implant Design in Cranioplasty II. AutoImplant 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92652-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92652-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92651-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92652-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
