Abstract
This paper is about the ambiguous love-hate relationship people have with complexity in social decision contexts: There seems to be a tipping point where increasing complexity seen as exciting and satisfying turns to overwhelming and annoying nuisance. People tend to have an intuitive understanding about what constitutes a complex situation. The paper investigates this intuition to find out more about complexity in a bottom-up approach where a complexity definition would emerge from people’s intersubjective understanding. It therefore looks for the relation between a subjective feeling individual people might arbitrarily share with others by chance, and objective, measurable features underlying a decision situation. The paper combines gamification and simulation to address these questions. By increasing complexity in a gamified social decision situation, empirical data is generated about people’s complexity intuitions. The empirical games are then simulated—calibrated by the gamification setting for producing artificial data. The analysis compares the ratings of perceived complexity and satisfaction in empirical games with a set of metrics derived from the simulations. Correlations between participants’ ratings and simulation metrics provide insights into the complexity experience: Sentiments about complexity may be related to objective features that enable a bottom-up definition of measurable social complexity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Knight, F.H.: Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Kelley and Millman, New York (1921)
Krohn, W.: Realexperimente - Die Modernisierung der “offenen Gesellschaft” durch experimentelle Forschung. Erwägen Wissen Ethik 18(3), 343–356 (2007)
Bieri, J.: Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51, 263–268 (1955)
Bieri, J., Atkins, A.L., Briar, S., Leaman, R.L., Miller, H., Tripodi, T.: Clinical and Social Judgment: The Discrimination of Behavioral Information. Wiley, New York (1966)
Crockett, W.H.: Cognitive complexity and impression formation. In: Maher, B.A. (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research, vol. 2, pp. 47–90. Academic Press, New York (1965)
Kolmogorov, A.: Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2(1–4), 157–168 (1968)
Schmidhuber, J.: What’s interesting? Technical Report IDSIA-35–97, Lugano (1997)
Dessalles, J.: La pertinence et ses origines cognitives. Hermes-Science Publications, Paris (2008)
Feldman, J.: How surprising is a simple pattern? Quantifying “Eureka!” Cognition 93, 199–224 (2004)
Chater, N.: The search for simplicity: a fundamental cognitive principle?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 52(A), 273–302 (1999)
Chater, N., Vitányi, P.: Simplicity: a unifying principle in cognitive science? Trends Cogn. Sci. 7(1), 19–22 (2003)
Kahneman, D.: Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)
Sanjeev, A., Boaz, B.: Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge, UK (2009)
Yeung, RW.: A First Course in Information Theory. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers (2002)
Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1951)
Arthur, W.B.: Inductive Reasoning and Bounded Rationality. Am. Econ. Rev. 84, 406–411 (1994)
Parsons, T., Shils, E. A.: Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge (1951)
Luhmann N.: Soziologische Aspekte des Entscheidungsverhaltens. In: Lukas E., Tacke V. (eds.) Schriften zur Organisation 2, Springer VS, Wiesbaden (2019)
Schelling, T.: Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1(2), 143–186 (1971)
Szczepanska, T., Antosz, P., Bernd, J., Borit, M., Chattoe-Brown, E., Mehryar, S., Meyer, R., Onggo, S., Verhagen, H.: Mixing games and agent-based modelling. A systematic literature review (forthcoming)
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Accessed 30 May 2021
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo Party model. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1997), http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/Party. Accessed 30 May 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Herget, F., Kleppmann, B., Ahrweiler, P., Gruca, J., Neumann, M. (2022). How Perceived Complexity Impacts on Comfort Zones in Social Decision Contexts—Combining Gamification and Simulation for Assessment. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92842-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92843-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)