Skip to main content

On the Impact of Misvaluation on Bilateral Trading

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Social Simulation

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 498 Accesses

Abstract

Subjective biases and errors systematically affect market equilibria, whether at the population level or in bilateral trading. Here, we consider the possibility that an agent engaged in bilateral trading is mistaken about her own value of the good she expects to trade. Although it may sound paradoxical that a subjective private valuation is something an agent can be mistaken about, as it is up to her to fix it, we consider the case in which that agent, seller or buyer, consciously or not, given the structure of a market, a type of goods, and a temporary lack of information, may, more or less consciously, state an erroneous valuation. The typical context through which this possibility may arise is in relation with so-called experience goods which are sold while all their intrinsic qualities are still unknown (like, e.g. untasted bottled fine wines). We model that “private misvaluation” phenomenon. The agents can also be mistaken about how their exchange counterparts are themselves mistaken. We analyse and simulate the consequences of first-order and second-order private misvaluation on market equilibria and bubbles, and notably focus on the context where the second-order expectations about the other agent’s misvaluation are not met.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Following Squintani in [7] we consider two situations in our paper depending on whether the agents try to rationalize or not the signals they receive.

  2. 2.

    In the simple case discussed in this paper when the updating process keeps the difference between first and second order misvaluation levels constant there will be no difference in bid and ask prices for these two updating strategies.

  3. 3.

    This is the price, from a seller’s perspective, that would be quoted by a seller having a maximum possible private value. The value can be calculated by substituting a value \(\overline{v}_s\) for a variable \(v_s\) in Eq. 4.

  4. 4.

    This is the price, from a seller’s perspective, that would be quoted by a buyer having a maximum possible private value. The value can be calculated by substituting a value \(\overline{v}_b\) for a variable \(v_b\) in Eq. 10 and replacing \(\delta _b\) with \(\delta _s'\) and \(\delta _b'\) with \(\delta _s\).

  5. 5.

    The parameter \(\beta \) represents the stubbornness of a seller.

  6. 6.

    This is the price, from a seller’s perspective, that would be quoted by a buyer having a minimum possible private value. The value can be calculated by substituting a value \(\underline{v}_b\) for a variable \(v_b\) in Eq. 10 and replacing \(\delta _b\) with \(\delta _s'\) and \(\delta _b'\) with \(\delta _s\).

  7. 7.

    Mean price is calculated based on the prices of successful trades.

  8. 8.

    Trading frequency is defined as the ratio of the buyers (or sellers) that successfully traded to the total number of buyers (respectively sellers).

References

  1. Acemoğlu, D., Como, G., Fagnani, F., Ozdaglar, A.: Opinion fluctuations and disagreement in social networks. Math. Oper. Res. 38(1), 1–27 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bratley, P., Fox, B.L.: Algorithm 659: implementing Sobol’s quasirandom sequence generator. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. (TOMS) 14(1), 88–100 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatterjee, K., Samuelson, W.: Bargaining under incomplete information. Oper. Res. 31(5), 835–851 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christophe, D., Petr, S.: randtoolbox: generating and testing random numbers. Austria, Vienna (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gizatulina, A., Hellman, Z.: No trade and yes trade theorems for heterogeneous priors. J. Econ. Theory 182, 161–184 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A.: Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econ. Theory 29(2), 265–281 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Squintani, F.: Mistaken self-perception and equilibrium. Econ. Theory 27(3), 615–641 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Czupryna .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Czupryna, M. (2022). On the Impact of Misvaluation on Bilateral Trading. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics