Skip to main content

A Communications Validity Detector for SCADA Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Critical Infrastructure Protection XV (ICCIP 2021)

Abstract

Supervisory control and data acquisition systems (SCADA) are attractive targets due to their widespread use in the critical infrastructure. A large percentage of attacks involve crafted inputs. Buffer overflows, a form of crafted input attack, are still common. These attacks can be used to take over SCADA systems or force them to crash. The compromised systems could be leveraged to issue commands to other devices in a SCADA network and cause harm.

This chapter presents a novel forensic tool that enables operators to detect crafted input attacks and monitor SCADA systems and networks for harmful actions. The tool incorporates several language-theoretic security-compliant parsers to ensure the syntactic validity of communications, enabling the detection of zero-day attacks that leverage crafted packets. The tool also detects attacks triggered using legacy protocols and includes graphical user interfaces, command-line interfaces and tools for comparing network traffic against configuration files to detect malicious activities. Experimental evaluations of the parsers using a large SCADA network traffic dataset demonstrate their efficacy. Fuzzing experiments demonstrate the resilience of the parsers as well as the tool itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. F. Adelstein, Live forensics: Diagnosing your system without killing it first, Communications of the ACM, vol. 49(2), pp. 63–66, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I. Ahmed, S. Obermeier, M. Naedele and G. Richard, SCADA systems: Challenges for forensics investigators, IEEE Computer, vol. 45(12), pp. 44–51, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Anantharaman, V. Kothari, J. Brady, I. Jenkins, S. Ali, M. Millian, R. Koppel, J. Blythe, S. Bratus and S. Smith, Mismorphism: The heart of the weird machine, in Security Protocols XXVII, J. Anderson, F. Stajano, B. Christianson and V. Matyas (Eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 113–124, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Anantharaman, K. Palani, R. Brantley, G. Brown, S. Bratus and S. Smith, PhasorSec: Protocol security filters for wide-area measurement systems, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Berthier and W. Sanders, Specification-based intrusion detection for advanced metering infrastructures, Proceedings of the Seventeenth IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, pp. 184–193, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bradbury, The “air gap” between IT and OT is disappearing, and we’re not ready to manage the risk, Infosecurity Magazine, February 26, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Bratus, A. Crain, S. Hallberg, D. Hirsch, M. Patterson, M. Koo and S. Smith, Implementing a vertically-hardened DNP3 control stack for power applications, Proceedings of the Second Annual Industrial Control System Security Workshop, pp. 45–53, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Brenner, Eyes wide shut: The growing threat of cyber attacks on industrial control systems, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 69(5), pp. 15–20, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Byers, Cyber security and the pipeline control system, Pipeline and Gas Journal, pp. 58–59, February 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Chang, T. Bryan, A. McKinnon and M. Hadley, Enabling situational awareness in operational technology environments through software-defined networking, Journal of Information Warfare, vol. 18(4), pp. 156–166, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Crain and C. Sistrunk, S4x14 Video: Crain/Sistrunk – Project Robus, Master Serial Killer, Digital Bond, Sunrise, Florida (dale-peterson.com/2014/01/23/s4x14-video-crain-sistrunk-project-robus-master-serial-killer), 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. denandz, fuzzotron: A TCP/UDP Based Network Daemon Fuzzer, GitHub (github.com/denandz/fuzzotron), 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Eden, A. Blyth, P. Burnap, Y. Cherdantseva, K. Jones and H. Soulsby, A forensic taxonomy of SCADA systems and approach to incident response, Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on ICS and SCADA Cyber Security Research, pp. 42–51, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ehrlich, D. Krummacker, C. Fischer, R. Guillaume, S. Perez Olaya, A. Frimpong, H. de Meer, M. Wollschlaeger, H. Schotten and J. Jasperneite, Software-defined networking as an enabler for future industrial network management, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, pp. 1109–1112, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Electricity Information Sharing and Analysis Center, Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid, Washington, DC, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Falliere, L. O’Murchu and E. Chien, W32.Stuxnet Dossier, Version 1.4, Symantec, Mountain View, California, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Fioraldi, D. Maier, H. Eissfeldt and M. Heuse, AFL++: Combining incremental steps of fuzzing research, Proceedings of the Fourteenth USENIX Workshop on Offensive Technologies, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Formby, P. Srinivasan, A. Leonard, J. Rogers and R. Beyah, Who’s in control of your control system? Device fingerprinting for cyber-physical systems, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Network Distributed System Security Symposium, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Hong, C. Liu and M. Govindarasu, Integrated anomaly detection for cyber security of substations, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 5(4), pp. 1643–1653, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kalra, D. Dolezilek, J. Mathew, R. Raju, R. Meine and D. Pawar, Using software-defined networking to build modern, secure IEC 61850 based substation automation systems, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Developments in Power System Protection, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Lee, H. Kim, K. Kim and P. Yoo, Simulated attack on the DNP3 protocol in SCADA systems, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Maglaras and J. Jiang, Intrusion detection in SCADA systems using machine learning techniques, Proceedings of the Science and Information Conference, pp. 626–631, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Millian, P. Anantharaman, S. Bratus, S. Smith and M. Locasto, Converting an electric power utility network to defend against crafted inputs, in Critical Infrastructure Protection XIII, J. Staggs and S. Shenoi (Eds.), Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 73–85, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Naedele, Addressing IT security for critical control systems, Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. Narayanan and R. Bobba, Learning-based anomaly detection for industrial arm applications, Proceedings of the Workshop on Cyber-Physical Systems Security and Privacy, pp. 13–23, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  26. National Institute of Standards and Technology, CVE-2020-10613 Detail, National Vulnerability Database, Gathersburg, Maryland (nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10613), April 22, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Pats, pythonfuzz: Coverage-Guided Fuzz Testing for Python, GitLab (gitlab.com/gitlab-org/security-products/analyzers/fuzzers/pythonfuzz), 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Patterson, Hammer, GitLab (gitlab.special-circumstanc.es/hammer/hammer), 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Perlroth and C. Krauss, A cyberattack in Saudi Arabia had a deadly goal. Experts fear another try, New York Times, March 15, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  30. W. Ren, T. Yardley and K. Nahrstedt, EDMAND: Edge-based multilevel anomaly detection for SCADA networks, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Step Function I/O, Aegis Fuzzer, Bend, Oregon (stepfunc.io/products/aegis-fuzzer), 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  32. F. Tacliad, T. Nguyen and M. Gondree, DoS exploitation of Allen-Bradley’s legacy protocol through fuzz testing, Proceedings of the Third Annual Industrial Control System Security Workshop, pp. 24–31, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  33. D. Urbina, J. Giraldo, A. Cardenas, N. Tippenhauer, J. Valente, M. Faisal, J. Ruths, R. Candell and H. Sandberg, Limiting the impact of stealthy attacks on industrial control systems, Proceedings of the ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 1092–1105, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  34. V. Urias, W. Stout and B. Van Leeuwen, On the feasibility of generating deception environments for industrial control systems, presented at the IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  35. C. Valli, SCADA forensics with Snort IDS, Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management, pp. 618–621, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. R. van der Knijff, Control systems/SCADA forensics, what’s the difference? Digital Investigation, vol. 11(3), pp. 160–174, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Verba and M. Milvich, Idaho National Laboratory Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Intrusion Detection System (SCADA IDS), Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp. 469–473, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Wright, Forensics management, in Handbook of SCADA/Control Systems Security, R. Radvanovsky and J. Brodsky (Eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 169–200, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  39. T. Yardley, Building a physical testbed for black start restoration, presented at the ICS Village at DEF CON Safe Mode, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. Zhu, A. Joseph and S. Sastry, A taxonomy of cyber attacks on SCADA systems, Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things and Fourth International Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, pp. 380–388, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  41. B. Zhu and S. Sastry, SCADA-specific intrusion detection/prevention systems: A survey and taxonomy, Proceedings of the First Workshop on Secure Control Systems, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Anantharaman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anantharaman, P. et al. (2022). A Communications Validity Detector for SCADA Networks. In: Staggs, J., Shenoi, S. (eds) Critical Infrastructure Protection XV. ICCIP 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 636. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93511-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93511-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93510-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93511-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics