Skip to main content

Tool Support for Fractal Enterprise Modeling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling

Abstract

This chapter discusses the authors’ experience of building tool support for a modeling technique called Fractal Enterprise Model (FEM) using the ADOxx metamodeling environment. FEM is introduced as a means for helping the management to comprehend how their organization operates, giving a picture understandable for the management team. It depicts interconnections between the business processes in an enterprise and connects them to the assets they use and manage. Assets considered in the model could be tangible (buildings, heavy machinery, etc.) and intangible (reputation, business process definitions, etc.). First, the chapter presents FEM informally—as a text with examples—and formally, as a metamodel. Then, the authors present the requirements on a tool support for FEM and discuss how these requirements were fulfilled in a tool called the FEM toolkit developed with the help of ADOxx.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hoverstadt, P.: Why business should take Enterprise architecture seriously. In: Gøtze, J., Jensen-Waud, A. (eds.) Beyond alignment, Systems, vol. 3, pp. 55–166. College Publishing, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0.2, Object Management Group (OMG), Document formal/2013-12-09, December 2013. In: OMG. Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF. Accessed 2013

  3. Beer, S.: The Heart of Enterprise. Wiley, Chichester (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. OMG: Business Motivation Model, Version 1.2, Object Management Group (OMG), Document formal/2014-05-01, May 2014. Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.2/PDF

  5. The open group: ArchiMate® 3.0.1 Specification. In: The Open Group. Available at: https://publications.opengroup.org/standards/archimate/specifications/c179. Accessed 2020

  6. Hoverstadt, P.: The viable system model. In: Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide, pp. 87–133. Springer, London (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. NIST: Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0), Draft Federal Information Processing Standards, Publication 183, 1993. In: IDEF. Available at: https://www.idef.com/idefo-function_modeling_method/. Accessed 1993

  8. ADOxx.org: ADOxx. Available at: https://www.adoxx.org. Accessed 2017

  9. Bider, I., Perjons, E., Elias, M., Johannesson, P.: A fractal enterprise model and its application for business development. SoSyM. 16(3), 663–689 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bider, I.: Structural coupling, strategy and fractal Enterprise Modeling. In: Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2020, LNBIP 385, pp. 95–111. Springer (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bider, I., Lodhi, A.: Moving from manufacturing to software business: A business model transformation pattern. In: Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2019, LNBIP 378, pp. 514–530. Springer (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bider, I., Chalak, A.: Evaluating usefulness of a fractal Enterprise model experience report. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS 2019, EMMSAD 2019, LNBIP, vol. 352, pp. 359–373 (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Giesen, E., Berman, S.J., Bell, R., Blitz, A.: Three ways to successfully innovate your business model. Strategy & Leadership. 35(6), 27–33 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Using a fractal enterprise model for business model innovation. In: BPMDS 2017 RADAR, CEUR, vol. 1859, pp. 20–29. (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Defining transformational patterns for business model innovation. In: Perspectives in business informatics research: 17th international conference, BIR 2018, Stockholm, Sweden. LNBIP. 330, 81–95 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Josefsson, M., Widman, K., Bider, I.: Using the process-assets framework for creating a holistic view over process documentation. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, LNBIP, vol. 214, pp. 169–183. Springer, Stockholm (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Maturana, H.: Autopoiesis, structural coupling & cognition. Cybern Hum knowing. 9(3–4), 5–34 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoverstadt, P.: Defining Identity by Structural Coupling in VSM Practice. UK Systems Society, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoverstadt, P., Loh, L.: Patterns of Strategy. Taylor & Francis, London (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. FEM toolkit. Available at: https://www.fractalmodel.org/fem-toolkit/. Accessed 27 Feb 2021

  21. Give Team: Insightmaker. Available at: http://insightmaker.com/. Accessed 2014

  22. Klyukina, V., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Does fractal enterprise model fit operational decision making? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information System (ICEIS) 2021, vol. 2, pp. 613–624 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leego, S., Bider, I.: Using fractal enterprise model in technology-driven organisational change projects: A case of a water utility company. In: 23rd IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2021, vol. 2, pp. 107–116 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the ADOxx team for providing them with the environment for experimentation that allowed the creation of a toolkit using the minimum of resources. They are also much in debt to Dominik Bork who implemented the first version of the FEM toolkit and continues to support their efforts. The authors are also grateful to their students and colleagues Steven Leego, Erik Falenius, and August Carlsson who independently tested the FEM toolkit in practical projects. The first author’s work was partly supported by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1226).

Tool Download: https://www.omilab.org/fem

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ilia Bider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bider, I., Perjons, E., Klyukina, V. (2022). Tool Support for Fractal Enterprise Modeling. In: Karagiannis, D., Lee, M., Hinkelmann, K., Utz, W. (eds) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93547-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93547-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93546-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93547-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics