Abstract
This chapter discusses the authors’ experience of building tool support for a modeling technique called Fractal Enterprise Model (FEM) using the ADOxx metamodeling environment. FEM is introduced as a means for helping the management to comprehend how their organization operates, giving a picture understandable for the management team. It depicts interconnections between the business processes in an enterprise and connects them to the assets they use and manage. Assets considered in the model could be tangible (buildings, heavy machinery, etc.) and intangible (reputation, business process definitions, etc.). First, the chapter presents FEM informally—as a text with examples—and formally, as a metamodel. Then, the authors present the requirements on a tool support for FEM and discuss how these requirements were fulfilled in a tool called the FEM toolkit developed with the help of ADOxx.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hoverstadt, P.: Why business should take Enterprise architecture seriously. In: Gøtze, J., Jensen-Waud, A. (eds.) Beyond alignment, Systems, vol. 3, pp. 55–166. College Publishing, London (2013)
OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0.2, Object Management Group (OMG), Document formal/2013-12-09, December 2013. In: OMG. Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF. Accessed 2013
Beer, S.: The Heart of Enterprise. Wiley, Chichester (1979)
OMG: Business Motivation Model, Version 1.2, Object Management Group (OMG), Document formal/2014-05-01, May 2014. Available at: http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.2/PDF
The open group: ArchiMate® 3.0.1 Specification. In: The Open Group. Available at: https://publications.opengroup.org/standards/archimate/specifications/c179. Accessed 2020
Hoverstadt, P.: The viable system model. In: Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide, pp. 87–133. Springer, London (2010)
NIST: Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0), Draft Federal Information Processing Standards, Publication 183, 1993. In: IDEF. Available at: https://www.idef.com/idefo-function_modeling_method/. Accessed 1993
ADOxx.org: ADOxx. Available at: https://www.adoxx.org. Accessed 2017
Bider, I., Perjons, E., Elias, M., Johannesson, P.: A fractal enterprise model and its application for business development. SoSyM. 16(3), 663–689 (2017)
Bider, I.: Structural coupling, strategy and fractal Enterprise Modeling. In: Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2020, LNBIP 385, pp. 95–111. Springer (2020)
Bider, I., Lodhi, A.: Moving from manufacturing to software business: A business model transformation pattern. In: Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS 2019, LNBIP 378, pp. 514–530. Springer (2020)
Bider, I., Chalak, A.: Evaluating usefulness of a fractal Enterprise model experience report. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS 2019, EMMSAD 2019, LNBIP, vol. 352, pp. 359–373 (2019)
Giesen, E., Berman, S.J., Bell, R., Blitz, A.: Three ways to successfully innovate your business model. Strategy & Leadership. 35(6), 27–33 (2007)
Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Using a fractal enterprise model for business model innovation. In: BPMDS 2017 RADAR, CEUR, vol. 1859, pp. 20–29. (2017)
Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Defining transformational patterns for business model innovation. In: Perspectives in business informatics research: 17th international conference, BIR 2018, Stockholm, Sweden. LNBIP. 330, 81–95 (2018)
Josefsson, M., Widman, K., Bider, I.: Using the process-assets framework for creating a holistic view over process documentation. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, LNBIP, vol. 214, pp. 169–183. Springer, Stockholm (2015)
Maturana, H.: Autopoiesis, structural coupling & cognition. Cybern Hum knowing. 9(3–4), 5–34 (2002)
Hoverstadt, P.: Defining Identity by Structural Coupling in VSM Practice. UK Systems Society, Oxford (2010)
Hoverstadt, P., Loh, L.: Patterns of Strategy. Taylor & Francis, London (2017)
FEM toolkit. Available at: https://www.fractalmodel.org/fem-toolkit/. Accessed 27 Feb 2021
Give Team: Insightmaker. Available at: http://insightmaker.com/. Accessed 2014
Klyukina, V., Bider, I., Perjons, E.: Does fractal enterprise model fit operational decision making? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Enterprise Information System (ICEIS) 2021, vol. 2, pp. 613–624 (2021)
Leego, S., Bider, I.: Using fractal enterprise model in technology-driven organisational change projects: A case of a water utility company. In: 23rd IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, CBI 2021, vol. 2, pp. 107–116 (2021)
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to the ADOxx team for providing them with the environment for experimentation that allowed the creation of a toolkit using the minimum of resources. They are also much in debt to Dominik Bork who implemented the first version of the FEM toolkit and continues to support their efforts. The authors are also grateful to their students and colleagues Steven Leego, Erik Falenius, and August Carlsson who independently tested the FEM toolkit in practical projects. The first author’s work was partly supported by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1226).
Tool Download: https://www.omilab.org/fem
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bider, I., Perjons, E., Klyukina, V. (2022). Tool Support for Fractal Enterprise Modeling. In: Karagiannis, D., Lee, M., Hinkelmann, K., Utz, W. (eds) Domain-Specific Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93547-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93547-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93546-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93547-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)