Skip to main content

The Expected Value Test: A New Statistical Warrant for Theoretical Saturation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Quantitative Ethnography (ICQE 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1522))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The basic goal of quantitative ethnography (QE) is to use statistics to warrant theoretical saturation. In QE studies that use epistemic network analysis (ENA), statistical comparisons between two or more samples are often used as warrants. However, no standard quantitative techniques have been developed to provide warrants absent of differences between samples—e.g., for the data overall or for particular individuals in the data. In this paper, I introduce the expected value test (EVT), a technique for finding statistical warrants for single samples in the context of ENA-based QE analyses. Building on the concepts of agreement due to chance and randomization, the EVT generates a distribution of networks whose edge weights approximate the expected value of the edge weights due to chance. Using these distributions affords tests of statistical significance been observed networks and chance-based networks. These tests provide warrants that connections observed qualitatively and measured by ENA are theoretically saturated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Crucially, though less important to the arguments in this paper, researchers also close the interpretive loop—that is, they judge whether their qualitative interpretations align with the quantitative results.

  2. 2.

    Another way in which Cohen’s kappa is meaningful is the extent to which it generalizes, which is addressed by Shaffer’s rho.

  3. 3.

    In the coded data examined by Csanadi and colleagues, each line could be coded for only one code, therefore this issue did not apply to their data. However, in other contexts, multiple codes may be assigned to the same line.

  4. 4.

    Typically, ENA also performs a dimensional reduction on the collection of normalized and centered networks via singular value decomposition. However, the analysis presented here focused on the complete networks rather than their projections in a low dimensional space.

  5. 5.

    In this sense, the EVT is essentially an empirical version of Hoetelling’s T test. However, for that test, the squared Mahalanobis distance is used in place of the Euclidean distance and a normal distribution is assumed.

  6. 6.

    Because a dimensional reduction was not used to project the networks in a lowdimensional space, I have positioned the nodes of these networks in a circle to simplify their presentation.

References

  1. Bressler, D.M., Bodzin, A.M., Eagan, B., Tabatabai, S.: Using epistemic networkanalysis to examine discourse and scientific practice during a collaborative game. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 28(5), 553–566 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20, 37–46 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Csanadi, A., Eagan, B., Kollar, I., Shaffer, D.W., Fischer, F.: When coding-andcounting is not enough: using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 13(4), 419–438 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Aldine, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hod, Y., Katz, S., Eagan, B.: Refining qualitative ethnographies using epistemic network analysis: a study of socioemotional learning dimensions in a humanistic knowledge building community. Comput. Educ. 156, 103943 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnston, J.H., Poirier, J., Smith-Jentsch, K.A.: Decision making under stress: creating a research methodology. In: Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E. (eds.) Making Decisions Under Stress: Implications for Individual and Team Training, pp. 39–59. American Psychological Association, Washington D.C (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Marquart, C., Swiecki, Z., Collier, W., Eagan, B., Woodward, R., Shaffer, D.W.: rENA: Epistemic Network Analysis (Version 0.2.1.2) (2018). https://cran.rstudio.com/web/packages/rENA/index.html

  8. Shaffer, D.W.: Quantitative Ethnography. Cathcart Press, Madison (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruis, A.R., Rosser, A.A., Quandt-Walle, C., Nathwani, J.N., Shaffer, D.W., Pugh, C.M.: The hands and head of a surgeon: modeling operative competency with multimodal epistemic network analysis. Am. J. Surg. 216(5), 835–840 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Farrell, C., Shaffer, D.W.: Assessing individual contributions to collaborative problem solving: a network analysis approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 104, 105876 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu, B., Hu, Y., Ruis, A.R., Wang, M.: Analysing computational thinking in collaborative programming: a quantitative ethnography approach. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 35, 421–434 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachari Swiecki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Swiecki, Z. (2022). The Expected Value Test: A New Statistical Warrant for Theoretical Saturation. In: Wasson, B., Zörgő, S. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Ethnography. ICQE 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1522. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93859-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93858-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93859-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics