Skip to main content

Capabilities for Digital Process Innovation: Results of an Ongoing Action Research Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2021)

Abstract

Organizations around the globe are faced with digital transformation. However, many of these organizations, especially small- and medium-sized enterprises, lack the corresponding individual skills as well as the organizational capabilities to implement digital process innovations and change the corresponding organizational routines. This research-in-progress paper reports on preliminary results of an action research study. We conceptualize organizational digital process innovation capabilities as dynamic capabilities and create a theoretical understanding of these capabilities with their corresponding microfoundations, i.e., the individual employee’s skills. Based on an in-depth action research study we will be able to show in how far outside consulting support will change individuals’ skills as well as organizational capabilities. We thus contribute to both theory on organizational capability-building for digital process innovation as well as dynamic capability theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Name of the company pseudonymized for confidentiality reasons.

  2. 2.

    An earlier version of these results of Phase 0 was presented at the International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik 2021.

References

  1. Matt, C., Hess, T., Benlian, A.: Digital transformation strategies. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(5), 339–343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciriello, R.F., Richter, A., Schwabe, G.: Digital innovation. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(6), 563–569 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wiesböck, F., Hess, T.: Digital innovations. Electron. Mark. 30(1), 75–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00364-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Plattfaut, R.: Robotic process automation - process optimization on steroids? In: Krcmar, H., Fedorowicz, J., Boh, W.F., Leimeister, J.M., Wattal, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Association for Information Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Nguyen Phillips, A., Kiron, D., Buckley, N.: Achieving digital maturity: adapting your company to a changing world. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wenzel, M., Danner-Schröder, A., Spee, A.P.: Dynamic capabilities? Unleashing their dynamics through a practice perspective on organizational routines. J. Manag. Inq. 105649262091654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620916549

  7. Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J. Inf. Technol. 11, 235–246 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Urbach, N., et al.: The impact of digitalization on the IT department. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 61(1), 123–131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0570-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sebastian, I.M., Ross, J.W., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K.G., Fonstad, N.O.: How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 16, 197–213 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fichman, R., Santos, B.D., Zheng, Z.: Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 38, 329–353 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Robotic process automation at telefónica O2. MIS Q. Exec. 15, 21–35 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pentland, B.T., Liu, P., Kremser, W., Haerem, T.: The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. MIS Q. 44, 19–47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35, 147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493

  14. Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E.: Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? AMR 26, 22–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 997–1010 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Mgmt. J. 18, 509–533 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3c509::AID-SMJ882%3e3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Mgmt. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13, 339–351 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strat. Mgmt. J. 21, 1105–1121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3c1105::AID-SMJ133%3e3.0.CO;2-E

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Helfat, C.E.: Dynamic Capabilities. Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Barreto, I.: Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future. J. Manag. 36, 256–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C.: What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11, 29–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Blyler, M., Coff, R.W.: Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 677–686 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Felin, T., Powell, T.C.: Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 58, 78–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Felin, T., Foss, N.J.: Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg. Organ. 3, 441–455 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisenhardt, K.M., Furr, N.R., Bingham, C.B.: CROSSROADS—microfoundations of performance: balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21, 1263–1273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strat. Mgmt. J. 36, 831–850 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salvato, C., Vassolo, R.: The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strat. Mgmt. J. 39, 1728–1752 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wohlgemuth, V., Wenzel, M., Berger, E.S., Eisend, M.: Dynamic capabilities and employee participation: the role of trust and informal control. Eur. Manag. J. 37, 760–771 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bapuji, H., Hora, M., Saeed, A., Turner, S.: How understanding-based redesign influences the pattern of actions and effectiveness of routines. J. Manag. 45, 2132–2162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aral, S., Weill, P.: IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18, 763–780 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim, G., Shin, B., Kim, K., Lee, H.: IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. JAIS 12, 487–517 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiesboeck, F.: Thinking Outside of the IT Capability Box. AMCIS 2018 Proceedings, vol. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lu, Y., Ramamurthy, K.: Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: an empirical examination. MIS Q. 35, 931 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967

  35. Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Jr.: Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Info Syst. J. 26, 47–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Susman, G.I.: Action research: a sociotechnical systems perspective. In: Morgan, G. (ed.) Beyond method. Strategies for social research. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif. (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coghlan, D., Shani, A.B.: Creating action research quality in organization development: rigorous, reflective and relevant. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 27(6), 523–536 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9311-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148642

  39. Baskerville, R., Wood-Harper, A.T.: Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 7, 90–107 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Coad, P., Yourdon, E.: Object-oriented Analysis. Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Glaser, V.L.: Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. AMJ 60, 2126–2154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aguirre, S., Rodriguez, A.: Automation of a business process using robotic process automation (RPA): a case study. In: Figueroa-García, J.C., López-Santana, E.R., Villa-Ramírez, J.L., Ferro-Escobar, R. (eds.) WEA 2017. CCIS, vol. 742, pp. 65–71. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralf Plattfaut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Plattfaut, R., Borghoff, V. (2022). Capabilities for Digital Process Innovation: Results of an Ongoing Action Research Study. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94343-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics