Abstract
Organizations around the globe are faced with digital transformation. However, many of these organizations, especially small- and medium-sized enterprises, lack the corresponding individual skills as well as the organizational capabilities to implement digital process innovations and change the corresponding organizational routines. This research-in-progress paper reports on preliminary results of an action research study. We conceptualize organizational digital process innovation capabilities as dynamic capabilities and create a theoretical understanding of these capabilities with their corresponding microfoundations, i.e., the individual employee’s skills. Based on an in-depth action research study we will be able to show in how far outside consulting support will change individuals’ skills as well as organizational capabilities. We thus contribute to both theory on organizational capability-building for digital process innovation as well as dynamic capability theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Name of the company pseudonymized for confidentiality reasons.
- 2.
An earlier version of these results of Phase 0 was presented at the International Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik 2021.
References
Matt, C., Hess, T., Benlian, A.: Digital transformation strategies. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 57(5), 339–343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5
Ciriello, R.F., Richter, A., Schwabe, G.: Digital innovation. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 60(6), 563–569 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0559-8
Wiesböck, F., Hess, T.: Digital innovations. Electron. Mark. 30(1), 75–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00364-9
Plattfaut, R.: Robotic process automation - process optimization on steroids? In: Krcmar, H., Fedorowicz, J., Boh, W.F., Leimeister, J.M., Wattal, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2019. Association for Information Systems (2019)
Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Nguyen Phillips, A., Kiron, D., Buckley, N.: Achieving digital maturity: adapting your company to a changing world. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 2017 (2017)
Wenzel, M., Danner-Schröder, A., Spee, A.P.: Dynamic capabilities? Unleashing their dynamics through a practice perspective on organizational routines. J. Manag. Inq. 105649262091654 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620916549
Baskerville, R.L., Wood-Harper, A.T.: A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J. Inf. Technol. 11, 235–246 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/026839696345289
Urbach, N., et al.: The impact of digitalization on the IT department. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 61(1), 123–131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0570-0
Sebastian, I.M., Ross, J.W., Beath, C., Mocker, M., Moloney, K.G., Fonstad, N.O.: How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Q. Exec. 16, 197–213 (2017)
Fichman, R., Santos, B.D., Zheng, Z.: Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 38, 329–353 (2014)
Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Robotic process automation at telefónica O2. MIS Q. Exec. 15, 21–35 (2016)
Pentland, B.T., Liu, P., Kremser, W., Haerem, T.: The dynamics of drift in digitized processes. MIS Q. 44, 19–47 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14458
Leonardi, P.M.: When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Q. 35, 147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
Priem, R.L., Butler, J.E.: Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? AMR 26, 22–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011928
Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 997–1010 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.332
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A.: Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Mgmt. J. 18, 509–533 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3c509::AID-SMJ882%3e3.0.CO;2-Z
Teece, D.J.: Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Mgmt. J. 28, 1319–1350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Zollo, M., Winter, S.G.: Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organ. Sci. 13, 339–351 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.3.339.2780
Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strat. Mgmt. J. 21, 1105–1121 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11%3c1105::AID-SMJ133%3e3.0.CO;2-E
Helfat, C.E.: Dynamic Capabilities. Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell, Oxford (2007)
Barreto, I.: Dynamic capabilities: a review of past research and an agenda for the future. J. Manag. 36, 256–280 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350776
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C.: What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? Int. J. Manag. Rev. 11, 29–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x
Blyler, M., Coff, R.W.: Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: ties that split pies. Strat. Mgmt. J. 24, 677–686 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.327
Felin, T., Powell, T.C.: Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. Calif. Manag. Rev. 58, 78–96 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.78
Felin, T., Foss, N.J.: Strategic organization: a field in search of micro-foundations. Strateg. Organ. 3, 441–455 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127005055796
Eisenhardt, K.M., Furr, N.R., Bingham, C.B.: CROSSROADS—microfoundations of performance: balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ. Sci. 21, 1263–1273 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0564
Helfat, C.E., Peteraf, M.A.: Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strat. Mgmt. J. 36, 831–850 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
Salvato, C., Vassolo, R.: The sources of dynamism in dynamic capabilities. Strat. Mgmt. J. 39, 1728–1752 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2703
Wohlgemuth, V., Wenzel, M., Berger, E.S., Eisend, M.: Dynamic capabilities and employee participation: the role of trust and informal control. Eur. Manag. J. 37, 760–771 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.02.005
Bapuji, H., Hora, M., Saeed, A., Turner, S.: How understanding-based redesign influences the pattern of actions and effectiveness of routines. J. Manag. 45, 2132–2162 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317744251
Aral, S., Weill, P.: IT assets, organizational capabilities, and firm performance: how resource allocations and organizational differences explain performance variation. Organ. Sci. 18, 763–780 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0306
Kim, G., Shin, B., Kim, K., Lee, H.: IT capabilities, process-oriented dynamic capabilities, and firm financial performance. JAIS 12, 487–517 (2011). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00270
Wiesboeck, F.: Thinking Outside of the IT Capability Box. AMCIS 2018 Proceedings, vol. (2018)
Lu, Y., Ramamurthy, K.: Understanding the link between information technology capability and organizational agility: an empirical examination. MIS Q. 35, 931 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2307/41409967
Lyytinen, K., Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Jr.: Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. Info Syst. J. 26, 47–75 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093
Susman, G.I.: Action research: a sociotechnical systems perspective. In: Morgan, G. (ed.) Beyond method. Strategies for social research. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif. (1985)
Coghlan, D., Shani, A.B.: Creating action research quality in organization development: rigorous, reflective and relevant. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 27(6), 523–536 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-013-9311-y
Baskerville, R., Wood-Harper, A.T.: Diversity in information systems action research methods. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 7, 90–107 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000298
Coad, P., Yourdon, E.: Object-oriented Analysis. Yourdon Press, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991)
Glaser, V.L.: Design performances: how organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. AMJ 60, 2126–2154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0842
Aguirre, S., Rodriguez, A.: Automation of a business process using robotic process automation (RPA): a case study. In: Figueroa-GarcĂa, J.C., LĂłpez-Santana, E.R., Villa-RamĂrez, J.L., Ferro-Escobar, R. (eds.) WEA 2017. CCIS, vol. 742, pp. 65–71. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66963-2_7
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Plattfaut, R., Borghoff, V. (2022). Capabilities for Digital Process Innovation: Results of an Ongoing Action Research Study. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94342-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94343-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)