Skip to main content

IntraPlanet: An Embodied Approach of Teaching the Seasons Using Augmented Reality

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications (IMCL 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 411))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1443 Accesses

Abstract

This paper evaluates an embodied learning intervention with augmented reality features, for teaching the phenomenon of the seasons. It was conducted at the Elementary Education Department of the University of Western Macedonia among 62 sixth grade students. The goal was to explore the learning effects of an easily reproducible environment created with accessible hardware.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Driver, R.: Children’s Ideas in Science. McGraw-Hill Education (UK) (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vosniadou, S.: Designing curricula for conceptual restructuring: lessons from the study of knowledge acquisition in astronomy. J. Curric. Stud. 23(3), 219–237 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakas, C., Mikropoulos, T.: Design of virtual environments for the comprehension of planetary phenomena based on students’ ideas. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25(8), 949–967 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ojala, J.: Lost in space? the concepts of planetary phenomena held by trainee primary school teachers. Int. Res. Geogr. Environ. Educ. 6(3), 183–203 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W.R., der Veen, J.T.: The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Comput. Educ. 58(1), 136–153 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smetana, L.K., Bell, R.L.: Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: a critical review of the literature. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 34(9), 1337–1370 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Angelo, C., Rutstein, D., Harris, C., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Haertel G.: Simulations for STEM learning: systematic review and meta-analysis. Menlo Park SRI Int. (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richards, T.: Using kinesthetic activities to teach Ptolemaic and Copernican retrograde motion. Sci. Educ. 21(6), 899–910 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xefteris, S., Palaigeorgiou, G., Zoumpourtikoudi, H.: Educational robotics for creating tangible simulations: a mixed reality space for learning the day/night cycle. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) IMCL 2019. AISC, vol. 1192, pp. 971–982. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49932-7_90

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Chiu, J.L., DeJaegher, C.J., Chao, J.: The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students’ understanding of gas properties. Comput. Educ. 85, 59–73 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Birchfield, D.A., Tolentino, L., Koziupa, T.: Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: two science studies. J. Educ. Psychol. 106(1), 86 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., Johnson, E.: Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Comput. Educ. 95, 174–187 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sneider, C., Bar, V., Kavanagh, C.: Learning about seasons: a guide for teachers and curriculum developers. Astron. Educ. Rev. 10(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baxter, J.: Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 11(5), 502–513 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Danaia, L., McKinnon, D.H.: Common alternative astronomical conceptions encountered in junior secondary science classes: Why is this so?,” Astron. Educ. Rev. 6(2), 32–53 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dunlop, J.: How children observe the universe. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 17(2), 194–206 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker, J., Heywood, D.: The earth and beyond: developing primary teachers’ understanding of basic astronomical events. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 20(5), 503–520 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Trumper, R.: Assessing students basic astronomy conceptions from junior high school through university. Aust. Sci. Teach. J. 41(1), 21–43 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai, C.-C., Chang, C.-Y.: Lasting effects of instruction guided by the conflict map: experimental study of learning about the causes of the seasons. J. Res. Sci. Teach. Off. J. Natl. Assoc. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(10), 1089–1111 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roald, I., Mikalsen, O.: Configuration and dynamics of the earth-sun-moon system: an investigation into conceptions of deaf and hearing pupils. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 23(4), 423–440 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharp, J.G., Kuerbis, P.: Children’s ideas about the solar system and the chaos in learning science. Sci. Educ. 90(1), 124–147 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kikas, E.: The impact of teaching on students’ definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena. Learn. Instr. 8(5), 439–454 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, J., Sung, Y.T., Hou, H.T., Chang, K.E.: The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Comput. Educ. 73, 178–188 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shelton, B.E., Hedley, N.R.: Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. In: The First IEEE International Workshop Agumented Reality Toolkit, p. 8 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sin, A.K., Zaman, H.B.: Live Solar System (LSS): Evaluation of an Augmented Reality book-based educational tool. In: 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology, vol. 1, pp. 1–6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xefteris, S., Palaigeorgiou, G.: Mixing educational robotics, tangibles and mixed reality environments for the interdisciplinary learning of geography and history. Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. 9(2), 82–98 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hassenzahl, M., Monk, A.: The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 25(3), 235–260 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson, S.A., Marsh, H.W.: Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 18(1), 17–35 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Palaigeorgiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anastasiadou, E., Xefteris, S., Palaigeorgiou, G. (2022). IntraPlanet: An Embodied Approach of Teaching the Seasons Using Augmented Reality. In: Auer, M.E., Tsiatsos, T. (eds) New Realities, Mobile Systems and Applications. IMCL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96296-8_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96295-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96296-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics