Abstract
Once a work is published academic authors may not spend much time thinking about its data any longer. If an author decides to revisit a similar subject, or share old data with a colleague, having properly formatted original data can make that easier. Unfortunately, files and documentation may get lost or misplaced as students and postdocs change jobs, or file types become obsolete and difficult to access. Research data is valuable to authors, universities, and the scientific community. Many funding institutions around the world are now requiring data management plans to be submitted along with a research proposal [1]. However, it can be difficult for funders to evaluate if data plans are properly exercised. The Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST) seeks to be among the first institutions that have a centralized copy of all its published research data. As of this fiscal year, OIST now requires the curated archival of published research data. This ensures that not only the final published document is available, but also the raw data and information necessary to reach the conclusions presented in the publication. OIST strives to make sure that this data stays organized and easily accessible in the years to come. However, archiving requires a high level of cooperation from authors, and it cannot be a one-sided effort by the university administration. This conference proceeding covers our motivations, experiences, challenges, and summarizes the preliminary results from our first 6 months of archiving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloemers, M., Montesanti, A.: The FAIR funding model: providing a framework for research funders to drive the transition toward FAIR data management and stewardship practices. Data Intell. 2(1–2), 171–180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00039
Vines, T.H., et al.: The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Curr. Biol. 24(1), 94–97 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.014
Ray, J.M. (ed.): Research Data Management: Practical Strategies for Information Professionals. DGO-Digital Original. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette (2014). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq34t
Meystre, S.M., Lovis, C., Bürkle, T., Tognola, G., Budrionis, A., Lehmann, C.U.: Clinical data reuse or secondary use: current status and potential future progress. Yearb. Med. Inform. 26(1), 38–52 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2017-007
Meskus, M., Marelli, L., D’Agostino, G.: Research misconduct in the age of open science: the case of STAP stem cells. Sci. Culture 27(1), 1–23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1316975
Guidelines for Responding to Misconduct in Research. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/jinzai/fusei/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2015/07/13/1359618_01.pdf
Homepage of re3data. https://www.re3data.org/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Leyden, M.R., Luscombe, N.M., Purohit, M. (2022). Development of the Research Data Archive at OIST. In: Sachdeva, S., Watanobe, Y., Bhalla, S. (eds) Big-Data-Analytics in Astronomy, Science, and Engineering. BDA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13167. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96600-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96600-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96599-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96600-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)