Skip to main content

Multiagent Foundations for Distributed Systems: A Vision

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Engineering Multi-Agent Systems (EMAS 2021)

Abstract

Early works and retrospectives by the researchers who founded the network protocols underlying current distributed systems indicate they were aware of the importance of capturing application meaning but didn’t know how to handle it programmatically. Therefore, those researchers introduced simplifications in the protocols that violated their own principle of the end-to-end argument in systems design.

The thesis of this vision paper is the following. First, the above-mentioned simplifications, especially the reliance on reliable, ordered communication protocols such as TCP have run their course. Modern applications demand flexibility that can only be achieved through modeling application meaning, and many applications (such as those based on the Internet of Things) cannot pay TCP’s overhead. Second, the multiagent systems community has developed alternative meaning-based approaches that can provide a new foundation for distributed computing at large.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Capuzzimati, F.: A commitment-based infrastructure for programming socio-technical systems. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 14(4), 23:1–23:23 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Capuzzimati, F., Micalizio, R.: Type checking for protocol role enactments via commitments. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. 32(3), 349–386 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-018-9382-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boissier, O., Bordini, R.H., Hübner, J.F., Ricci, A., Santi, A.: Multi-agent oriented programming with JaCaMo. Sci. Comput. Program. 78(6), 747–761 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheriton, D.R., Skeen, D.: Understanding the limitations of causally and totally ordered communication. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Symposium on Operating System Principles (SOSP), Asheville, North Carolina, pp. 44–57. ACM Press (1993). https://doi.org/10.1145/168619.168623

  5. Chopra, A.K., Christie V, S.H., Singh, M.P.: An evaluation of communication protocol languages for engineering multiagent systems. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 69, 1351–1393 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chopra, A.K., Dalpiaz, F., Aydemir, F.B., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Singh, M.P.: Protos: Foundations for engineering innovative sociotechnical systems. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 53–62 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Cupid: commitments in relational algebra. In: Proceedings of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2052–2059 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Custard: computing norm states over information stores. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 1096–1105. IFAAMAS, Singapore (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christie V, S.H., Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Bungie: improving fault tolerance via extensible application-level protocols. IEEE Comput. 54(5), 44–53 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Christie V, S.H., Smirnova, D., Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Protocols over things: a decentralized programming model for the Internet of Things. IEEE Comput. 53(12), 60–68 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, D.: The network and the OS. In: SOSP History Day, Monterey, California, pp. 11:1–11:19. ACM (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2830903.2830912

  12. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: Operational specification of a commitment-based agent communication language. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pp. 535–542. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Günay, A., Chopra, A.K.: Stellar: a programming model for developing protocol-compliant agents. In: Weyns, D., Mascardi, V., Ricci, A. (eds.) EMAS 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11375, pp. 117–136. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25693-7_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Huhns, M.N. (ed.): Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Pitman/Morgan Kaufmann, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Istio: Introducing Istio: a robust service mesh for microservices (2017). https://istio.io/v0.1/blog/istio-service-mesh-for-microservices.html. Accessed 16 June 2021

  16. King, T.C., Günay, A., Chopra, A.K., Singh, M.P.: Tosca: operationalizing commitments over information protocols. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 256–264 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Microsoft: Microservice architecture style (2019). https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices. Accessed 16 June 2021

  18. Saltzer, J.H., Reed, D.P., Clark, D.D.: End-to-end arguments in system design. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2(4), 277–288 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1145/357401.357402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, M.P.: Agent communication languages: rethinking the principles. IEEE Comput. 31(12), 40–47 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh, M.P.: Information-driven interaction-oriented programming: BSPL, the Blindingly Simple Protocol Language. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 491–498 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, M.P., Chopra, A.K.: Clouseau: generating communication protocols from commitments. In: Proceedings of the 34th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 7244–7252. AAAI Press, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, M.P., Chopra, A.K.: Computational governance and violable contracts for blockchain applications. IEEE Comput. 53, 53–62 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh, M.P., Huhns, M.N.: Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents. Wiley, Chichester (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Winikoff, M.: Implementing commitment-based interactions. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1–8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: applying event calculus planning using commitments. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, pp. 527–534. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grants from the NSF (IIS-1908374) and EPSRC (EP/N027965/1) supported this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit K. Chopra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chopra, A.K., Christie V, S.H., Singh, M.P. (2022). Multiagent Foundations for Distributed Systems: A Vision. In: Alechina, N., Baldoni, M., Logan, B. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13190. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97457-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97457-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97456-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97457-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics