Skip to main content

Is It Real? – Learners’ Perceptions on Tele-Immersive 3D Video Technology and Its Further Use in K-12 Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Digital Transformation of Education and Learning - Past, Present and Future (OCCE 2021)

Abstract

Current immersive technology applications, such as virtual and augmented reality (VR/AR), are still limited in providing an immersive experience in which a user is perceived in 3 dimensions (3D) as their real self. Furthermore, research on such immersive environments applied to educational contexts is scarce. To investigate the unexplored opportunities of immersive technologies in education, we carried out a trial of our tele-immersive platform (TIP) with elementary school 6th grade learners (12–13-year-olds) working on an environmental study lesson. During our investigations, we applied qualitative analysis of the learners’ focus group interview, researchers’ field notes, and recordings of test sessions, alongside descriptive statistics of questionnaires. Learners expressed feelings of positive surprise and excitement, and felt the technology enabled their participation throughout the lesson. Learners recounted feelings of ‘being there’ inside the environment, and in the company of the teacher. Learners agreed that their sense of physical proximity and presence inside the immersive environment is similar to that of face-to-face interaction with the teacher. With our investigations, the opportunities of this emerging technology towards boosting online educational activities for learners to develop their 21C skills are highlighted. Our findings indicate that the introduced 3D TIP technology has the critical potential to overcome psychological strains due to physical distance in online education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nash, C.: Report on digital literacy in academic meetings during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. Challenges 11(2), 20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/challe1102002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hacker, J., vom Brocke, J., Handali, J., Otto, M., Schneider, J.: Virtually in this together - how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 29(5), 563–584 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Luo H., Li G., Feng Q., Yang Y., Zuo M.: Virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2019. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12538

  4. Johnson-Glenberg, M.C.: Immersive VR and education: embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Front. Robot. AI 5, 81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rötkönen, E., Najmul Islam, A.K.M., Sutinen, E.: Toward pedagogy driven virtual reality learning space design. In: Tatnall, A., Mavengere, N. (eds.) SUZA 2019. IAICT, vol. 564, pp. 235–244. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28764-1_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. IIEP-UNESCO. https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/improve-learning/curriculum-and-materials/information-and-communication-technology-ict. Accessed 4 Apr 2021

  7. Lindsay, J.: Connecting beyond the classroom - move from local to global learning modes. Scan. 36, 27–38 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liesa-Orús, M., Latorre-Cosculluela, C., Vázquez-Toledo, S., Sierra-Sánchez, V.: The technological challenge facing higher education professors: perceptions of ICT tools for developing 21C skills. Sustainability 12(13), 5339 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Facer, K.: Learning Futures: Education, Technology and Social Change, 1st edn. Routledge, London (2011). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817308

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Papanastasiou, G., Drigas, A., Skianis, C., Lytras, M., Papanastasiou, E.: Virtual and augmented reality effects on K-12, higher and tertiary education students’ twenty-first century skills. Virtual Reality 23(4), 425–436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0363-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurst, B., Wallace, R., Nixon, S.B.: The impact of social interaction on student learning. Read. Horiz. J. Lit. Lang. Arts, 52(4), 375–398 (2013). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol52/iss4/5

  12. Nowak, K.L., Biocca, F.: The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of Telepresence. Copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 12(5), 481–494 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322761289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Garrison, D., Anderson, T., Archer, W.: Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2, 87–105 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Herbelin, B., Vexo, F., Thalmann, D.: Sense of presence in virtual reality exposures therapy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ens, B., et al.: Revisiting collaboration through mixed reality: the evolution of groupware. Int. J. Hum Comput. Stud. 131, 81–98 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurillo, G., Bajcsy, R.: 3D teleimmersion for collaboration and interaction of geographically distributed users. Virtual Reality 17, 29–43 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-012-0217-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Economou, D., Doumanis, I., Argyriou, L., Georgalas, N.: User experience evaluation of human representation in collaborative virtual environments. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 21(6), 989–1001 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1075-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Orts-Escolano, S., et al.: Virtual 3D teleportation in real-time. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2016), pp. 741–754. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984517

  19. Zhang, H., Xu, F.: MixedFusion: real-time reconstruction of an indoor scene with dynamic objects. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(12), 3137–3146 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2786233

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Marniok, N., Goldluecke, B.: Real-time variational range image fusion and visualization for large-scale scenes using GPU Hash Tables. In: 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) on 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 912–920, Piscataway, NJ (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2018.00105

  21. Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Evenson, S.: Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), pp. 493–502. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704

  22. Gaver, W.: What should we expect from research through design? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), pp. 937–946. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538

  23. Lombard, M. et al.: Measuring presence: the temple presence inventory. In: Proceeding Presence 2009, 12th International Workshop on Presence, January, pp. 1–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Biocca, F., et al.: The networked minds measure of social presence: pilot test of the factor structure and concurrent validity. In: 4th Annual International Workshop, Presence, pp. 1–9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vorderer, P., et al.: MEC Spatial Presence Questionnaire (MEC-SPQ) Short Documentation and Instructions for Application. Report to the European. Community, Project Presence MEC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3, 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calkin Suero Montero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rötkönen, E., Suero Montero, C., Pope, N., Sutinen, E. (2022). Is It Real? – Learners’ Perceptions on Tele-Immersive 3D Video Technology and Its Further Use in K-12 Education. In: Passey, D., Leahy, D., Williams, L., Holvikivi, J., Ruohonen, M. (eds) Digital Transformation of Education and Learning - Past, Present and Future. OCCE 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 642. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97986-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97986-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-97985-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-97986-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics