Abstract
Education, personal self-development, and overall learning have vastly changed over the years as a result of historical events, methodologies, and technologies. As students first, and then as educators, we have only seen slight changes in the delivery of educational content, with the most accepted model being “one system fits all”, we have seen content and delivery mediums, but little about differentiating or personalizing the education experience. We challenge this traditional model by implementing an Adaptive Training Framework based on AI techniques through a Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment agent. We have conducted a limited sample size experiment to prove that personalized content allows the learner to achieve more than a static model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Watts, J., Robertson, N.: Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review. Educ. Res. 53(1), 33–50 (2011)
Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books, New York (2008)
Radloff, A., Coates, H.: Doing More for Learning: Enhancing Engagement and Outcomes: Australasian Survey of Student Engagement: Australasian Student Engagement Report (2010)
Kolb, D.A., Boyatzis, R.E., Mainemelis, C.: Experiential learning theory: previous research and new directions. In: Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 227–247 (2001)
Cagiltay, N.: Using learning styles theory in engineering education. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 33(4), 415–424 (2008)
An, D., Carr, M.: Learning styles theory fails to explain learning and achievement: recommendations for alternative approaches. Personality Individ. Differ. 116, 410–416 (2017)
Barrio, C.M., Munoz-Organero, M., Soriano, J.S.: Can gamification improve the benefits of student response systems in learning? An experimental study. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 4(3), 429–438 (2016)
Kiesler, S., Kraut, R.E., Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V., Mclaren, B.M.: Gamification in education: what, how, why bother. Acad. Exch. Q. 15(2), 1–5 (2011)
Kapp, K.M.: The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. Wiley San Francisco (2012)
Liu, C., Agrawal, P., Sarkar, N., Chen, S.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment in computer games through real-time anxiety-based affective feedback. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 25(6), 506–529 (2009)
Yien, J., Hung, C., Hwang, G., Lin, Y.: A game-based learning approach to improving students’ learning achievements in a Nutrition course. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol.-TOJET 10(2), 1–10 (2011)
Wang, L., Chen, M.: The effects of game strategy and preference-matching on flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 47(1), 39–52 (2010)
Brisson, A., et al.: Artificial intelligence and personalization opportunities for serious games. In: Eighth Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference, October 2012
Silva, M.P., do Nascimento Silva, V., Chaimowicz, L.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment on MOBA games. Entertain. Comput. 18, 103–123 (2017)
Ung, W.C., Meriaudeau, F., Tang, T.B.: Optimizing mental workload by functional near-infrared spectroscopy based dynamic difficulty adjustment. In: 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 1522–1525. IEEE, July 2018
Chang, D.M.J.: Dynamic difficulty adjustment in computer games. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Interactive Multimedia Systems Conference (2013)
Bederson, B.B.: Interfaces for staying in the flow. Ubiquity 5(27), 1 (2004)
Jegers, K.: Pervasive game flow: understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 5(1), 9-es (2007)
Stein, A., Yotam, Y., Puzis, R., Shani, G., Taieb-Maimon, M.: EEG-triggered dynamic difficulty adjustment for multiplayer games. Entertain. Comput. 25, 14–25 (2018)
Hunicke, R., Chapman, V.: AI for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games. In: Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence AAAI Workshop. AAAI Press, San Jose (2004)
Peng, C., Wang, D., Zhang, Y., Xiao, J.: A visuo-haptic attention training game with dynamic adjustment of difficulty. IEEE Access 7, 68878–68891 (2019)
Manoharan, S.: Personalized assessment as a means to mitigate plagiarism. IEEE Trans. Educ. 60(2), 112–119 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonti, A., Palaparthi, M., Jiang, X., Pham, T. (2022). TuneIn: Framework Design and Implementation for Education Using Dynamic Difficulty Adjustment Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning and Mathematical Approach. In: Bao, W., Yuan, X., Gao, L., Luan, T.H., Choi, D.B.J. (eds) Ad Hoc Networks and Tools for IT. ADHOCNETS TridentCom 2021 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 428. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98005-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98005-4_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98004-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98005-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)