Skip to main content

Challenges in Annotating a Treebank of Clinical Narratives in Brazilian Portuguese

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language (PROPOR 2022)

Abstract

Dependency parsing can enhance the performance of Named Entity Recognition (NER) models and can be leveraged to boost information extraction. NER tasks are essential to deal with clinical narratives, but models for Brazilian Portuguese dependency parsing are scarce, even less for clinical texts and its specificities. This paper reports on the development of a treebank of clinical narratives in Brazilian Portuguese and the drafting of guidelines. Based on a corpus of 1,000 clinical narratives manually annotated with semantic information, split into 12,711 sentences, we identified some characteristics of these texts that differ from traditional domains and have a deep impact on the annotation process, such as extensive use of acronyms and abbreviations, words not recognized by POS taggers, misspelling, special use of some symbols, different uses for numerals, heterogeneity of sentence sizes, and coordinated phrases without any punctuation. We developed a document to describe the annotation types and to explain how difficult cases should be treated to ensure consistency, including examples that could be found in this kind of texts. We created a Tag versus Frequency relation to justify some of the characteristics and challenges of the corpus. The corpus when completely annotated will be made available to the entire scientific community that performs research with clinical texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The use of SemClinBr texts was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research (CEP) of PUCPR, under register no. 1,354,675.

  2. 2.

    https://universaldependencies.org/treebanks/pt_bosque/index.html.

  3. 3.

    https://arboratorgrew.elizia.net/#/.

  4. 4.

    https://universaldependencies.org.

References

  1. Bretonnel Cohen, K., Demner-Fushman, D.: Biomedical Natural Language Processing. John Benjamins (2014). https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027271068

  2. Dalianis, H.: Basic building blocks for clinical text processing. In: Clinical Text Mining, pp. 55–82. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78503-5_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalianis, H., Hassel, M., Henriksson, A., Skeppstedt, M.: Stockholm EPR corpus: a clinical database used to improve health care. In: Swedish Language Technology Conference, pp. 17–18 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hao, T., Rusanov, A., Boland, M.R., Weng, C.: Clustering clinical trials with similar eligibility criteria features. J. Biomed. Inf. 52, 112–120 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiang, Z., Zhao, F., Guan, Y.: Developing a linguistically annotated corpus of Chinese electronic medical record. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), pp. 307–310. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lopes, F., Teixeira, C.A., Oliveira, H.G.: Contributions to clinical named entity recognition in Portuguese. In: BioNLP@ACL (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meystre, S.M., Savova, G.K., Kipper-Schuler, K.C., Hurdle, J.F.: Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Yearbook of Med. Inf. 17(01), 128–144 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Névéol, A., Dalianis, H., Velupillai, S., Savova, G., Zweigenbaum, P.: Clinical natural language processing in languages other than english: opportunities and challenges. J. Biomed. Semantics 9(1), 1–13 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogren, P.V., Savova, G.K., Chute, C.G., et al.: Constructing evaluation corpora for automated clinical named entity recognition. In: LREC, vol. 8, pp. 3143–3150 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oinam, N., Mishra, D., Patel, P., Choudhary, N., Desai, H.: A treebank for the healthcare domain. In: Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Linguistic Annotation, Multiword Expressions and Constructions (LAW-MWE-CxG-2018), pp. 144–155 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira, L., et al.: Semclinbr-a multi institutional and multi specialty semantically annotated corpus for Portuguese clinical NLP tasks. In: CoRR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira, L.E.S., de Souza, A.C., Nohama, P., Moro, C.M.C.: A novel method for identifying continuity of care in hospital discharge summaries. In: Zhang, Y.-T. (ed.) The International Conference on Health Informatics. IP, vol. 42, pp. 284–287. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. de Oliveira, L.F.A., e Oliveira, L.E.S., Gumiel, Y.B., Carvalho, D.R., Moro, C.M.C.: Defining a state-of-the-art POS-tagging environment for Brazilian Portuguese clinical texts. Res. Biomed. Eng. 36(3), 267–276 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42600-020-00067-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pakhomov, S.V., Coden, A., Chute, C.G.: Developing a corpus of clinical notes manually annotated for part-of-speech. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75(6), 418–429 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Percha, B.: Modern clinical text mining: a guide and review. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 4(1), 165–187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-030421-030931, pMID: 34465177

  16. Qi, P., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Bolton, J., Manning, C.D.: Stanza: a Python natural language processing toolkit for many human languages. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (2020). https://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/qi2020stanza.pdf

  17. Schneider, E.T.R., et al.: BioBERTpt - a Portuguese neural language model for clinical named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Clinical Natural Language Processing Workshop, pp. 65–72. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.clinicalnlp-1.7, https://aclanthology.org/2020.clinicalnlp-1.7

  18. Tateisi, Y., Tsujii, J.: Part-of-speech annotation of biology research abstracts. In: LREC (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wu, S.T., Liu, H., Li, D., Tao, C., Musen, M.A., Chute, C.G., Shah, N.H.: Unified medical language system term occurrences in clinical notes: a large-scale corpus analysis. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 19(e1), e149–e156 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas Ferro Antunes de Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

de Oliveira, L.F.A., Pagano, A., e Oliveira, L.E.S., Moro, C. (2022). Challenges in Annotating a Treebank of Clinical Narratives in Brazilian Portuguese. In: Pinheiro, V., et al. Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language. PROPOR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13208. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98305-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98305-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98304-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98305-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics