Skip to main content

Exploration of Factors that Can Impact the Willingness of Employees to Share Smart Watch Data with Their Employers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Privacy and Identity Management. Between Data Protection and Security (Privacy and Identity 2021)

Abstract

Companies increasingly equip employees with smart watches to, e.g., support them in carrying out their work. Smart watches can however collect data about them and reveal sensitive information. This may result in limiting the acceptance of these devices by employees, despite their potential helpfulness. In this paper, we therefore analyze factors that influence employees’ willingness to share smart watch captured private data. In more detail, we investigate employees’ technological knowledge about data collection and processing and the associated risks, their technical affinity, their smart watch ownership and usage, and their legislation knowledge about respective laws. To this end, we have conducted an online survey with more than 1,000 full-time employees. Our findings suggest that employees are aware of the risk associated with smart watches but partially have incorrect knowledge about legal frameworks. Moreover, more than one-third of the participants own a personal smart watch and have a certain technological affinity. However, our results reveal different impacts from these factors on employees’ willingness to share data with their employers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Applin, S.A., Fischer, M.D.: Watching me, watching you. (Process surveillance and agency in the workplace). In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS): Social Implications of Wearable Computing and Augmediated Reality in Everyday Life, pp. 268–275 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. BMW Group: Produktionsstart der neuen BMW 7er Limousine (2019). https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/austria/article/detail/T0292928DE

  3. CCS Insight: Healthy Outlook for Wearables As Users Focus on Fitness and Well-Being (2021). https://www.ccsinsight.com/press/company-news/healthy-outlook-for-wearables-as-users-focus-on-fitness-and-well-being/

  4. Choi, B., Hwang, S., Lee, S.H.: What drives construction workers’ acceptance of wearable technologies in the workplace?: Indoor localization and wearable health devices for occupational safety and health. Autom. Constr. 84(1), 31–41 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Academic Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Collins, P.M., Marassi, S.: Is that lawful?: data privacy and fitness trackers in the workplace. Int. J. Comp. Labour Law 37(1), 65–94 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Datta, P., Namin, A.S., Chatterjee, M.: A survey of privacy concerns in wearable devices. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), pp. 4549–4553 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davoudi, A., et al.: Accuracy of Samsung gear S smartwatch for activity recognition: validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 7(2), e11270 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dinev, T., Hart, P.J.: An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17(1), 61–80 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Franke, T., Attig, C., Wessel, D.: A personal resource for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale. Int. J. Human-Comput. Interact. 35(6), 456–467 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gorm, N., Shklovski, I.: Sharing steps in the workplace. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pp. 4315–4319 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isaak, J., Hanna, M.J.: User data privacy: Facebook, Cambridge analytica, and privacy protection. Computer 51(8), 56–59 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs, J.V., et al.: Employee acceptance of wearable technology in the workplace. Appl. Ergon. 78(1), 148–156 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kehr, F., Kowatsch, T., Wentzel, D., Fleisch, E.: Blissfully ignorant: the effects of general privacy concerns, general institutional trust, and affect in the privacy calculus. Inf. Syst. J. 25(6), 607–635 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th edn. Methodology in the Social Sciences, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kovacs, K., Ansari, F., Geisert, C., Uhlmann, E., Glawar, R., Sihn, W.: A process model for enhancing digital assistance in knowledge-based maintenance. In: Machine Learning for Cyber Physical Systems. TA, vol. 9, pp. 87–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58485-9_10

  17. Kritzler, M., Bäckman, M., Tenfält, A., Michahelles, F.: Wearable technology as a solution for workplace safety. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM), pp. 213–217. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mekruksavanich, S., Hnoohom, N., Jitpattanakul, A.: Smartwatch-based sitting detection with human activity recognition for office workers syndrome. In: 2018 IEEE International ECTI Northern Section Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Computer and Telecommunications Engineering (ECTI-NCON), pp. 160–164 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moore, P.V.: The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Motti, V.G., Caine, K.: Users’ privacy concerns about wearables. In: Brenner, M., Christin, N., Johnson, B., Rohloff, K. (eds.) FC 2015. LNCS, vol. 8976, pp. 231–244. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_17

  21. Ozdemir, Z.D., Smith, H.J., Benamati, J.H.: Antecedents and outcomes of information privacy concerns in a peer context: an exploratory study. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 26(6), 642–660 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prince, C.: Do consumers want to control their personal data? Empirical evidence. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 110, 21–32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Prince, C., Omrani, N., Maalaoui, A., Dabic, M., Kraus, S.: Are we living in surveillance societies and is privacy an illusion? An empirical study on privacy literacy and privacy concerns. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schaub, F., et al.: Watching them watching me: browser extensions’ impact on user privacy awareness and concern. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Workshop on Usable Security (USEC), pp. 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schellewald, V., Weber, B., Ellegast, R., Friemert, D., Hartmann, U.: Einsatz von Wearables zur Erfassung der körperlichen Aktivität am Arbeitsplatz. DGUV Forum 11(1), 36–37 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shoaib, M., Bosch, S., Scholten, H., Havinga, P.J., Incel, O.D.: Towards detection of bad habits by fusing smartphone and smartwatch sensors. In: Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 591–596 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Statista Inc.: Do you personally use wearables (e.g. smart watch, health / fitness tracker)? [Graph] (2021). https://www.statista.com/forecasts/1101110/wearables-devices-usage-in-selected-countries

  28. Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis): 12111–0004: Bevölkerung (Zensus): Deutschland, Stichtag, Geschlecht, Altersgruppen (2021). https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online

  29. Stocker, A., Brandl, P., Michalczuk, R., Rosenberger, M.: Mensch-zentrierte IKT-Lösungen in einer Smart Factory. e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 131(7), 207–211 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sun, Y., Wang, N., X., S.: Perceived benefits, privacy risks, and perceived justice in location information disclosure: a moderated mediation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tomczak, D.L., Lanzo, L.A., Aguinis, H.: Evidence-based recommendations for employee performance monitoring. Bus. Horiz. 61(2), 251–259 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Trang, S., Weiger, W.H.: The perils of gamification: does engaging with gamified services increase users’ willingness to disclose personal information? Comput. Hum. Behav. 116, 106644 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wang, T., Duong, T.D., Chen, C.C.: Intention to disclose personal information via mobile applications: a privacy calculus perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(4), 531–542 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wirtz, J., Lwin, M.O., Williams, J.D.: Causes and consequences of consumer online privacy concern. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 18(4), 326–348 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xu, H., Teo, H.H., Tan, B.C., Agarwal, R.: The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 26(3), 135–174 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, X., Liu, S., Chen, X., Wang, L., Gao, B., Zhu, Q.: Health information privacy concerns, antecedents, and information disclosure intention in online health communities. Inf. Manag. 55(4), 482–493 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ziegler, J., Heinze, S., Urbas, L.: The potential of smartwatches to support mobile industrial maintenance tasks. In: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies Factory Automation (ETFA), pp. 1–7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous participants who participated in the survey and our colleagues for their feedback on the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Richter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Questions

A Questions

Table 3. Intention to disclosure
Table 4. Smart watch ownership and usage
Table 5. Technical knowledge about smart watch capabilities
Table 6. Legislation knowledge - part 1
Table 7. Legislation knowledge - part 2
Table 8. Affinity for technology interaction [10]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Richter, A., Kühtreiber, P., Reinhardt, D. (2022). Exploration of Factors that Can Impact the Willingness of Employees to Share Smart Watch Data with Their Employers. In: Friedewald, M., Krenn, S., Schiering, I., Schiffner, S. (eds) Privacy and Identity Management. Between Data Protection and Security. Privacy and Identity 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 644. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99100-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99100-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99099-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99100-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics