Abstract
This research paper aims to report the development of a synergy model from two different fields of knowledge, namely Aesthetic Experience (AX) and User Experience (UX) using Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM). This model was put forward in order to fill the theoretical gaps in the context of technology-based arts application, such as augmented reality comics (AR comics). Most technology products only measure UX elements even though there are strong artistic elements on the product and vice versa, when most art products only measured at AX despite using the dominant technology on the product. Constructs and elements were built using a methodological review of six models, three from each AX and UX models. In the methodological review, the elements of AX and UX are synergise and are used as research items as constructs and elements for expert consensus process. A total of ten experts, constitute of half from each comics and AR related expertise were used to gain consensus on 16 constructs and 39 elements of AX and UX. The analysis was conducted based on FDM conditions, namely expert consensus >70%, threshold value (d) < 0.2, and fuzzy score, amax > 0.5.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hagman, H.: Aesthetic Experience Beauty, Creativity, and the Search for the Ideal. Contemporary Psychoanalytic Studies (2005)
Perlovsky, L.: Mystery in experimental psychology, how to measure aesthetic emotions? Front. Psychol. 5, 1006 (2014)
Moens, B.G.: Aesthetic experience in virtual museums: a post phenomenological perspective. Stud. Digital Herit. 2, 1 (2018)
Schoeller, F., Perlovsky, L.: Aesthetic chills: knowledge-acquisition, meaning-making, and aesthetic emotions. Front. Psychol. 7, 1093 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.201601093
Savaş, E.B., Verwijmeren, T., van Lier, R.: Aesthetic experience and creativity in interactive art. Art Percept. 9(2), 167–198 (2021)
Pelowski, M.: Tears and transformation: feeling like crying as an indicator of Insightful or “aesthetic” experience with art. Front. Psychol. 6, 1006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01006
Docherty, T.: Aesthetic Education and the Demise of Experience. Manchester University Press, In The new aestheticism (2018)
Schindler, I., et al.: Measuring aesthetic emotions: a review of the literature and a new assessment tool. PLoS ONE 12(6), e0178899 (2017)
Al-Azzawi, A.: Experience with Technology: Dynamics of User Experience with Mobile Media Devices. Springer Science & Business Media (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5397-9
Thielsch, M.T., Thielsch, C.: Depressive symptoms and web user experience. Peer J 6, e4439 (2018)
Hassenzahl, M.: The hedonic/pragmatic model of user experience. Towards a UX manifesto 10 (2007)
Ritsos, P.D., Ritsos, D.P., Gougoulis, A.S.: Standards for augmented reality: a user experience perspective. In: International AR Standards Meeting, pp. 1–9 (2011)
Qing-Xing, Q., Zhang, L., Chao, W.-Y., Duffy, V.: User experience design based on eye-tracking technology: a case study on smartphone APPs. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) Advances in applied digital human modeling and simulation, pp. 303–315. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41627-4_27
Klingbeil, M., Pasewaldt, S., Semmo, A., Döllner, J.: Challenges in user experience design of image filtering apps. In: SIGGRAPH Asia 2017 Mobile Graphics & Interactive Applications, 22. ACM. (2017)
Olsson, T., Lagerstam, E., Kärkkäinen, T., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: Expected user experience of mobile augmented reality services: a user study in the context of shopping centres. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 17(2), 287–304 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0494-x
Speicher, M., Hall, B.D., Nebeling, M.: What is mixed reality? In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2019)
Hamacher, A., Hafeez, J., Csizmazia, R., Whangbo, T.K.: Augmented reality user interface evaluation – performance measurement of hololens, moverio and mouse input. Int. J. Inter. Mob. Technol. (iJIM) 13(03), 95 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i03.10226
Cabero Almenara, J., Barroso, J.: The educational possibilities of augmented reality. New Appr. Educ. Res. 5(1) (2016)
Larsen, R.R., Sackris, D.: Feeling the Aesthetic: A Pluralist Sentimentalist Theory of Aesthetic Experience (2020)
Marques, D.: Augmented reality: the new kid on the block. J. Nat. Sci. Illust. 49(3), 12–14 (2017)
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., MacIntyre, B.: Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 21(6), 34–47 (2001)
Smith, C.: Motion comics: the emergence of a hybrid medium. Writ. Vis. Cult. 7, 1–23 (2015)
Vassiliadi, M., Sylaiou, S., Papagiannakis, G.: Literary myths in mixed reality. Front. Digit. Humanit. 5, 21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2018.00021
Clayton, M.J.: Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ. Psychol. 17(4), 373–384 (1997)
Ayub, E., Mohamad, S.N.A., Wei, G.W., Luaran, J.: A learning design strategy framework for content transformation using fuzzy delphi method. Int. J. Inf. Educat. Technol. 10(12), 882–888 (2020)
Irshad, S., Awang Rambli, D.R.: Multi-layered mobile augmented reality framework for positive user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in HCI and UX Indonesia 2016, pp. 21–26. ACM (2016)
Redies, C.: Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 218 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00218
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, O., Augustin, D.: A model of aestjetic appreciation and aesthetic judgements. Br. J. Psychol. 95, 489–508 (2004)
Markovic, S.: Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception 3(1), 1–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap
Morreall, J.: Comic Relief. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444307795
Klaehn, J.: The craft of comics: an interview with comic book artists Norm Breyfogle. J. Grap. Novels Com. 6(1), 108–115 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2014.943414
Plutchik, R.: A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion. In: Theories of Emotion, pp. 3–33. Academic press (1980)
Parrot, W.: Emotions in Social Psychology. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (2001)
Jamil, M.R.M., Said, S., Azeez, M.I.K.: Kopetemsi guru terhadap pengurusan pengajaran dan pembelajaran: suatu pendekatan kaedah fuzzy Delphi. Jurnal kepimpinan pendidikan 1(3), 77–88 (2014)
Manakandan, S.K., Rosnah, I., Mohd, J.R., Priya, R.: Pesticide applicators questionnaire content validation: a fuzzy Delphi method. Med. J. Malaysia 72(4), 228–235 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hashim, M.E.A., Idris, M.Z., Said, C.S. (2022). The Heptagon of AUX Model: Development of a Synergising Model on Aesthetic Experience and User Experience through the Fuzzy Delphi Method Towards Augmented Reality Comics. In: Lv, Z., Song, H. (eds) Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. INTETAIN 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 429. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99188-3_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99188-3_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99187-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99188-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)