Abstract
The several approaches available on literature regarding the origins of the universe conduct us to remove certainty concerning what we know about the world: the things (artifacts), theories, and behaviors among other effects. Making an analogy with it and some constructs of Human Computer Interaction, we face that the waves or paradigms have been concentrated on different focus, however, ontologically in intersection and complementarity with each other. To illustrate these connections, several creative design case studies, developed in different eras are described. The results and discussion about the waves characteristics, the theoretical concepts and those practical cases, will probably, take us to think better on a less bumpy road that leads to more positive user experiences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bannon, L.: From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In: Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (eds.) Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems Erlbaum, pp. 25–44 (1986)
Bannon, L.: From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In: Design at Work, pp. 25–44. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc. (1992)
Bannon, L.: Reimagining HCI: toward a more human-centered perspective. Interactions 18(4), 50–57 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978822.1978833
Barbot, B., Besançon, M., Lubart, T.: Assessing creativity in the classroom. Open Educ. J. 4(Suppl1), 58–66 (2011)
Blevis, E., et al.: Transdisciplinary interaction design in design education. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 833–838. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2724726
Bødker, S.: When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings NordiCHI 2006, pp. 14–18. ACM, New York (2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476
Bødker, S.: Third wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Interactions 22(5), 24–31 (2015)
Borning, A., Muller, M.: Next steps for value sensitive design. In: Proceedings CHI 2012, pp. 1125–1134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208560
Cabrero, D.G., Lopes, A.G., Barricelli, B.R.: HCI within cross-cultural discourses of globally situated rhetorical and etymological interactions. In: Rau, P.-L. (ed.) CCD 2016. LNCS, vol. 9741, pp. 16–25. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40093-8_2
Calvo, R., Peters, D.: Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2014)
Chindogu: The Art of “Unuseless Idea”. RingTones, Gamesville, Rhapsody, Wired (2001). https://www.chindogu.com. Accessed 1 Sept 2020
Cockton, G.: A load of Cobbler’s children: beyond the model designing processor. In: Proceedings of the CHI 2013, pp. 2139–2148. ACM Press (2013)
Eysenck, H.J.: The Measurement of Creativity. In: Boden, M.A. (ed.) Dimensions of Creativity, pp. 199–242. The MIT Press (1994)
Florida, R.: The Rise of the Creative Class: and How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. Basic Books (2012)
Frauenberger, C.: Entanglement HCI the next wave? ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 27, 1–27 (2020). Article No.: 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998
Grudin, J., Pruitt, J.: Personas, participatory design and product development: an infrastructure for engagement. In: Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference, Malmo, Sweden (2002)
Grudin, J.: Three faces of human-computer interaction. IEEE Trans., 2–18 (2005)
Grudin, J.: A moving target—the evolution of human-computer interaction. In: Jackson, J. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, 3rd edn. p. 40. Taylor & Francis (2012)
Harper, R., Rodden, T., Rogers, Y., Sellen, A. (eds.): Being Human: Human-Computer Interaction in the Year 2020 (A3). Microsoft Research Ltd. (2008)
Harrison, S., Tatar, D., Sengers, P.: The three paradigms of HCI. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007. ACM, New York (2007)
Human Beans: (2001–2006). Accessed 6 Jan 2008. http://www.humanbeans.net/
Iedema, R.: Analyzing film and television: a social semiotic account of Hospital: an unhealthy business. In: van Leeuwen, T., Jewitt, C. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Analysis, pp. 183–206. Sage, London (2001)
Hutchins, E.: The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction (2006)
Kuutti, K., Bannon, L.J.: The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda. In: Proceedings CHI 2014, pp. 3543–3552 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557111
Laurel, B.: Gaian IxD. Interactions 18(5), 38–46 (2011). http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.uwl.ac.uk/10.1145/2008176.2008187
Leonardo Net – The Theory, Design and Application of Interactive Technologies (2005). Alan Dix and Hiraeth Mixed Media. http://www.leonardo-net.org/leonardonet.php. Accessed 29 Aug 2020
Lopes, A.: Design as Dialogue: Encouraging and Facilitating Interdisciplinary Collaboration. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller, Springer (2009). ISBN: 978-3-639-11713-4
Max-Neef, M.A.: Foundations of Transdisciplinarity. Ecol. Econ., 5–16 (2005)
McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)
Muller, M.J., Wharton, C., McIver Jr., W.J., Laux, L.: Toward an HCI research and practice agenda based on human needs and social responsibility. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 155–161 (1997)
Nicolescu, B.: Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. State University of New York Press, New York (2002)
Perry, M.: Distributed cognition. In: Carroll, J.M. (ed.) HCI Models, Theories and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, pp. 194–233. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)
Pyrko, I., Dörfler, V., Eden, C.: Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Hum. Relat. 70, 389–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726716661040
Rogers, Y.: HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2012)
Runco, M., Jaeger, G.: The standard definition of creativity. Creat. Res. J. 24(1), 92–96 (2012)
Sanders, E.B.-N.: From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Frascara, J. (ed.) Design and the Social Sciences: Making Connections, pp. 1–8. Taylor & Francis (2002)
Ashby, S., Hanna, J., Matos, S., Nash, C., Faria, A.: Fourth wave HCI meets the 21st century manifesto. In: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (HTTF 2019), pp. 1–11. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363467
Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)
Ren, X., Silpasuwanchai, C., Cahill, J.: Human-engaged computing: the future of human–computer interaction. CCF Trans. Pervasive Comput. Interact. 1(1), 47–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42486-019-00007-0
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lopes, A.G. (2022). HCI Four Waves Within Different Interaction Design Examples. In: Bhutkar, G., et al. Human Work Interaction Design. Artificial Intelligence and Designing for a Positive Work Experience in a Low Desire Society. HWID 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 609. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02904-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02904-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-02903-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-02904-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)