Skip to main content

PID and FOPID Controllers Combinations During Control of 3D Crane Optimized with GWO Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automation 2022: New Solutions and Technologies for Automation, Robotics and Measurement Techniques (AUTOMATION 2022)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1427))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 417 Accesses

Abstract

The article presents 3D crane control of all three axes (XYZ) and both angles (\(\alpha \) and \(\beta \)). PID controllers and their fractional counterparts - FOPID controllers, which have two additional parameters, were used. Previous research focused on a direct comparison of the two types of controllers. This time, the authors used various combinations to check which part of the system influences the quality of control the most. The model and simulations were implemented in the Matlab/Simulink environment. Grey-Wolf Optimizer was used to optimize the controller coefficients. Several combinations of PID and FOPID controllers were compared (e.g. 2 PID controllers on the XY axes and 3 FOPID controllers on the Z axis and \(\alpha \) and \(\beta \) angles).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Samin, R.E., Jie, L.M., Zawawi, M.A.: PID implementation of heating tank in mini automation plant using Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). In: International Conference on Electrical, Control and Computer Engineering 2011 (InECCE), pp. 515–519 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cortes, F., Linares, D., Patino, D., Melo, K.: A distributed model predictive control (D-MPC) for modular robots in chain configuration. In: IX Latin American Robotics Symposium and IEEE Colombian Conference on Automatic Control, pp. 1–6. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, O., Nicolas, J., Billat, A.: Adaptive neural network control of the temperature in an oven. In: IEE Colloquium on Advances in Neural Networks for Control and Systems, pp. 8/1–8/3 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Puchalski, B., Rutkowski, T.A., Duzinkiewicz, K.: Implementation of the FOPID algorithm in the PLC controller - PWR thermal power control case study. In: 23rd International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 229–234 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anbumani, K., Ranihemamalini, R., Pechinathan, G.: GWO based tuning of PID controller for a heat exchanger process. In: Third International Conference on Sensing, Signal Processing and Security (ICSSS), pp. 417–421 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agarwal, S., Singh, A.P., Anand, N.: Evaluation performance study of Firefly algorithm, particle swarm optimization and artificial bee colony algorithm for non-linear mathematical optimization functions. In: Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pp. 1–8 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Machado, J.T., Kiryakova, V., Mainardi, F.: Recent history of fractional calculus. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16(3), 1140–1153 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Veisi, A., Delavari, H.: Adaptive fractional order control of photovoltaic power generation system with disturbance observer. In: 7th International Conference on Control, Instrumentation and Automation (ICCIA), pp. 1–5 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Feng, P., Lu, L., Xue, D.: Compensation for network data dropouts based on modified fractional-order Kalman filter. In: The 27th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2015 CCDC), pp. 348–352 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Żegleń-Włodarczyk, J., Dziedzic, K.: Optimization of the FOPID parameters of the 3D crane control system by using GWO. In: 25th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR 2021), pp. 13–18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dziedzic, K.: Identification of fractional order transfer function model using biologically inspired algorithms. In: Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., Kaliczyńska, M. (eds.) AUTOMATION 2019. AISC, vol. 920, pp. 47–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13273-6_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Żegleń-Włodarczyk, J., Dziedzic, K.: Optimization of the FOPID parameters of the 3D crane control system by using GWO. Paper Accepted to be Published in Proceedings of the International Conference on Fractional Differentiation and its Applications (ICFDA’21) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oustaloup, A., Levron, F., Mathieu, B., Nanot, F.M.: Frequency-band complex noninteger differentiator: characterization and synthesis. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Fundam. Theory Appl. 47(1), 25–39 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mirjalili, S., Mirjalili, S.M., Lewis, A.: Grey wolf optimizer. Adv. Eng. Softw. 69, 46–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pauluk, M., Korytowski, A., Turnau, A., Szymkat, M.: Time optimal control of 3D crane. In: MMAR 2001 : Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics: Miedzyzdroje 28–31 August 2001, Robotics; Marine automation; Control engineering; Identification and Signal Processing, vol. 2, pp. 927–932 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. INTECO: 3D Crane User’s Manual. http://www.inteco.com.pl/Docs/3DCrane_um.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2021

  17. INTECO: 3D Crane - Laboratory model of industrial gantry crane controlled from PC. http://www.inteco.com.pl/products/3d-crane/. Accessed 24 Oct 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Żegleń-Włodarczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Żegleń-Włodarczyk, J., Wajda, K. (2022). PID and FOPID Controllers Combinations During Control of 3D Crane Optimized with GWO Algorithm. In: Szewczyk, R., Zieliński, C., Kaliczyńska, M. (eds) Automation 2022: New Solutions and Technologies for Automation, Robotics and Measurement Techniques. AUTOMATION 2022. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1427. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03502-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics