Abstract
The elaboration of systematic reviews has become a common practice in computer science after being exclusively related to healthcare and medical sciences. The process incorporates several steps to collect and analyze relevant papers to answer a set of well-formulated research questions. The search process starts by exploring different sources and digital libraries. This often results in a huge number of documents. After deduplication, the metadata of all the retrieved documents are checked for relevance before being approved for inclusion in the review. This task is known to be long and tiresome. In this paper, we propose a semi-automatic system that helps in reducing the efforts required for screening papers. The proposed system combines unsupervised and semi-supervised machine learning models and makes use of the domain ontology. Several features are extracted from metadata and used for classification. With the adoption of semi-supervised learning, researchers are only asked to manually label a subset of retrieved papers. Those papers are used to train a semi-supervised model which can then automatically classify the remaining papers. The proposed system is experimented with seven datasets built from pre-elaborated systematic reviews in computer science. We found that the system can save 50% of the efforts reaching up to 89% in terms of macro F1-score and up to 97% in terms of accuracy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Semantic Scholar home page: https://www.semanticscholar.org/.
- 2.
The systematic review toolbox: http://systematicreviewtools.com.
- 3.
Springer Nature: https://www.springer.com.
- 4.
Elsevier Science Direct: https://www.elsevier.com/.
- 5.
PubMed - National Library of Medicine: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
- 6.
Semantic Scholar API: https://pypi.org/project/semanticscholar/.
- 7.
- 8.
Scopus abstract and citation database: https://www.scopus.com.
- 9.
Datasets for automatic screening of papers: https://github.com/hannousse/Semantic-Scholar-Evaluation.
References
Al-Zubidy, A., Carver, J.C., Hale, D.P., Hassler, E.E.: Vision for SLR tooling infrastructure: prioritizing value-added requirements. Inf. Softw. Technol. 91, 72–81 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.06.007
Alhammad, M.M., Moreno, A.M.: Gamification in software engineering education: a systematic mapping. J. Syst. Softw. 141, 131–150 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.065
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003). https://doi.org/10.5555/944919.944937
Cairo, L.S., de Figueiredo Carneiro, G., da Silva, B.C.: Adoption of machine learning techniques to perform secondary studies: a systematic mapping study for the computer science field. In: Filipe, J., Smialek, M., Brodsky, A., Hammoudi, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2019, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 3–5 May 2019, pp. 351–356. SciTePress (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007780603510356
Dieste, O., Padua, A.G.: Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments for systematic reviews. In: 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, Madrid, Spain, 20–21 September 2007, pp. 215–224. IEEE Computer Society (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.19
Dybå, T., Kitchenham, B.A., Jørgensen, M.: Evidence-based software engineering for practitioners. IEEE Softw. 22(1), 58–65 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2005.6
Felizardo, K.R., Andery, G.F., Paulovich, F.V., Minghim, R., Maldonado, J.C.: A visual analysis approach to validate the selection review of primary studies in systematic reviews. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(10), 1079–1091 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.04.003
Ghafari, M., Saleh, M., Ebrahimi, T.: A federated search approach to facilitate systematic literature review in software engineering. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 3(2), 13–24 (2012). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2012.3202
Ghasemi, M., Amyot, D.: From event logs to goals: a systematic literature review of goal-oriented process mining. Requirements Eng. 25(1), 67–93 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-00308-3
Ghawi, R., Pfeffer, J.: Efficient hyperparameter tuning with grid search for text categorization using KNN approach with BM25 similarity. Open Comput. Sci. 9(1), 160–180 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2019-0011
González-Toral, S., Freire, R., Gualán, R., Saquicela, V.: A ranking-based approach for supporting the initial selection of primary studies in a systematic literature review. In: XLV Latin American Computing Conference, CLEI 2019, Panama, Panama, 30 September–4 October 2019, pp. 1–10. IEEE Computer Society (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235079
Goulão, M., Amaral, V., Mernik, M.: Quality in model-driven engineering: a tertiary study. Softw. Qual. J. 24(3), 601–633 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-016-9324-8
Guinea, A.S., Nain, G., Traon, Y.L.: A systematic review on the engineering of software for ubiquitous systems. J. Syst. Softw. 118, 251–276 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.05.024
Hannousse, A.: Searching relevant papers for software engineering secondary studies: semantic scholar coverage and identification role. IET Softw. 15(1), 126–146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2.12011
Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Brereton, P.: Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2015)
Marshall, C., Kitchenham, B.A., Brereton, P.: Tool features to support systematic reviews in software engineering - a cross domain study. e-Informatica Softw. Eng. J. 12(1), 79–115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5277/e-Inf180104
Michelson, M., Reuter, K.: The significant cost of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a call for greater involvement of machine learning to assess the promise of clinical trials. Contemp. Clin. Trials Commun. 16, 100443 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100443
Molléri, J.S., Petersen, K., Mendes, E.: Towards understanding the relation between citations and research quality in software engineering studies. Scientometrics 117(3), 1453–1478 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2907-3
Oghbaie, M., Mohammadi Zanjireh, M.: Pairwise document similarity measure based on present term set. J. Big Data 5(1), 1–23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-018-0163-2
Portenoy, J., West, J.D.: Constructing and evaluating automated literature review systems. Scientometrics 125(3), 3233–3251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03490-w
Salatino, A.A., Thanapalasingam, T., Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: The computer science ontology: a large-scale taxonomy of research areas. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11137, pp. 187–205. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00668-6_12
Santos, J.A.M., Rocha-Junior, J.B., Prates, L.C.L., do Nascimento, R.S., Freitas, M.F., de Mendonça, M.G.: A systematic review on the code smell effect. J. Syst. Softw. 144, 450–477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.07.035
Shahin, M., Babar, M.A., Zhu, L.: Continuous integration, delivery and deployment: a systematic review on approaches, tools, challenges and practices. IEEE Access 5, 3909–3943 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2685629
Silva, G., Neto, P.S., Moura, R.S., Araujo, A.C., da Costa Castro, O.C., Ibiapina, I.: An approach to support the selection of relevant studies in systematic review and systematic mappings. In: 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems BRACIS 2019, Salvador, Brazil, 15–18 October 2019, pp. 824–829. IEEE Computer Society (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/BRACIS.2019.00147
Van Dinter, R., Catal, C., Tekinerdogan, B.: A decision support system for automating document retrieval and citation screening. Expert Syst. Appl. 182, 115261 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115261
Vassilvitskii, S., Arthur, D.: k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In: Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, New Orleans Louisiana, USA, 7–9 January 2006, pp. 1027–1035. ACM (2006). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1283383.1283494
Yang, C., Liang, P., Avgeriou, P.: A systematic mapping study on the combination of software architecture and agile development. J. Syst. Softw. 111, 157–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.09.028
Yu, Z., Kraft, N.A., Menzies, T.: Finding better active learners for faster literature reviews. Empir. Softw. Eng. 23(6), 3161–3186 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9587-0
Yu, Z., Menzies, T.: Fast2: an intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers. Expert Syst. Appl. 120, 57–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021
Zhu, X.: Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical report TR 1530, University of Wisconsin, July 2008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hannousse, A., Yahiouche, S. (2022). A Semi-automatic Document Screening System for Computer Science Systematic Reviews. In: Djeddi, C., Siddiqi, I., Jamil, A., Ali Hameed, A., Kucuk, İ. (eds) Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. MedPRAI 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1543. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04112-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04112-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04111-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04112-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)