Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Smart Technology in the Classroom: Systematic Review and Prospects for Algorithmic Accountability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Intelligent Techniques in the Educational Process

Part of the book series: Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems ((LAIS,volume 29))

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

Smart technologies, which include but is not limited to artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, have emerged in the educational domain as a tool to make learning more efficient. Different applications for mastering particular skills, learning new languages, and tracking their progress are used by students. What is the effect on students from using this smart technology? We conducted a systematic review to understand the state of the art. We explored the literature in several subdisciplines: wearables, child psychology, AI and education, school surveillance, and accountability. Our review identified the need for more research for each established topic. We managed to find both positive and negative effects of using wearables, but cannot conclude if smart technology use leads to lowering the student’s performance. Based on our insights we propose a framework to effectively identify accountability for smart technology in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://apps.webofknowledge.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://scholar.google.com/.

  3. 3.

    https://facctconference.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://acm.org/euacm.

  5. 5.

    https://usacm.org.

References

  1. M. Ribble, Digital citizenship in schools: nine elements all students should know, in International Society for Technology in Education, 3rd edn. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.S. Baker, P.S. Inventado, Educational data mining and learning analytics, in Learning Analytics: From Research to Practice, (Springer, New York, 2014), pp. 61–75. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4

  3. M. Chassignol, A. Khoroshavin, A. Klimova, A. Bilyatdinova, Artificial intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview, in Procedia Computer Science, vol. 136 (Elsevier B.V., 2018), pp. 16–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233

  4. R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, L.B.F. Pearson, Intelligence unleashed an argument for AI in education, in Tech. rep. (Pearson Education, London, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. H.S. Nwana, Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview. Artif. Intell. Rev. 4(4), 251–277 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Murray, An overview of intelligent tutoring system authoring tools: updated analysis of the state of the art, in Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments (Springer Netherlands, 2003), pp. 491–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0819-7_17

  7. J.C. Nesbit, O.O. Adesope, Q. Liu, W. Ma, How effective are intelligent tutoring systems in computer science education?, in Proceedings–IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2014), pp. 99–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2014.38

  8. C. Conati, K. Porayska-Pomsta, M. Mavrikis, Ai in education needs interpretable machine learning: lessons from open learner modelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:180700154 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Beck, M. Stern, E. Haugsjaa, Applications of AI in education. Crossroads 3(1), 11–15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1145/332148.332153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Paviotti, P.G. Rossi, D. Zarka, Intelligent tutoring systems: an overview. (Pensa Multimedia, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. A.A. Gokhale, Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. J. Technol. Educ. 7(1), (1995). doi:https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v7i1.a.2

  12. A.L. Baylor, Promoting motivation with virtual agents and avatars: role of visual presence and appearance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364(1535), 3559–3565 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Muehlenbrock, Formation of learning groups by using learner profiles and context information, in AIED (2005), pp. 507–514

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Sattar, S. Palaniappan, A. Lokman, N. Shah, U. Khalid, R. Hasan, Motivating medical students using virtual reality based education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 15(2), 160–174 (2020). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217172

  15. J. Psotka, Immersive training systems: virtual reality and education and training. Instr. Sci. 23(5–6), 405–431 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V.S. Pantelidis, Virtual reality and engineering education. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 5(1), 3–12 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V.S. Pantelidis, Reasons to use virtual reality in education and training courses and a model to determine when to use virtual reality. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 10(2), 59–70 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Hussein, C. Nätterdal, The benefits of virtual reality in education-a comparison study. Bachelor’s thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, (2015), https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43559881.pdf

  19. F. Pedro, M. Subosa, A. Rivas, P. Valverde, Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development. (2019). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994

  20. J. Andriessen, J. Sandberg, Where is education heading and how about ai. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 10(2), 130–150 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. B.P. Woolf, H.C. Lane, V.K. Chaudhri, J.L. Kolodner, Ai grand challenges for education. AI Mag. 34(4), 66 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Hope, Governmentality and the ‘Selling’ of school surveillance devices. Sociol. Rev. 63(4), 840–857 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Casella, School security and its corporate offerings, in The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control, (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 389–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_20

  24. J.P. Nance, School surveillance and the fourth amendment. Wisconsin Law Rev. 2014

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hope, CCTV, school surveillance and social control. Br. Edu. Res. J. 35(6), 891–907 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902834233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Taylor, et al., The rise of the surveillance school, in Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (2012) pp. 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. Taylor, I spy with my little eye: the use of CCTV in schools and the impact on privacy. Sociol. Rev. 58(3), 381–405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01930.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Taylor, UK schools, CCTV and the data protection act 1998. J. Educ. Policy 26(1), 1–15 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2010.493226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. McCahill, R. Finn, The social impact of surveillance in three UK schools: ’angels’, ’devils’ and ’teen mums’. Surv. Soc. 7(3/4), (2010). doi:https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4156

  30. M. Birnhack, L. Perry-Hazan, S. German Ben-Hayun, CCTV surveillance in primary schools: normalisation, resistance, and children’s privacy consciousness. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 44(2), 204–220 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1386546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. V. Steeves, P. Regan, L.R. Shade, Digital surveillance in the networked classroom, in The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 445–466. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_23

  32. D. Ahrens, Schools, cyberbullies, and the surveillance state. Am. Crim. Law Rev. 49 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  33. A.D. Hope, School internet use: case studies in the sociology of risk. Ph.D. thesis, Durham University, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  34. L.R. Shade, R. Singh, “Honestly, we’re not spying on kids”: school surveillance of young people’s social media. Soc. Media+Soc. 2(4):205630511668000 (2016). doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116680005

  35. A. Hope, Unsocial media: school surveillance of student internet use, in The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 425–444. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_22

  36. A. Hope, The shackled school internet: Zemiological solutions to the problem of over-blocking. Learn. Media Technol. 38(3), 270–283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2012.670646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. A. Hope, Risk taking, boundary performance and intentional school internet "misuse". (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300601073663

  38. A.K. Jain, A. Ross, Introduction to biometrics. In: Handbook of Biometrics (Springer, US, 2007), pp. 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71041-9_1

  39. A. Hope, Biopower and school surveillance technologies 2.0. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 37(7), 885–904 (2016). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.1001060

  40. S.L. Gray, Biometrics in schools, in The Palgrave International Handbook of School Discipline, Surveillance, and Social Control (Springer International Publishing, 2018), pp. 405–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71559-9_21

  41. T. Bryce, M. Nellis, A.J. Corrigan, H. Gallagher, P. Lee, H. Sercombe, Biometric surveillance in schools: cause for concern or case for curriculum? Scott. Educ. Rev. 42(1), 3–22 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Maltoni, R. Cappelli, Fingerprint recognition, in Handbook of biometrics, (Springer, 2008), pp. 23–42

    Google Scholar 

  43. B. Gastic, Metal detectors and feeling safe at school. Educ. Urban Soc. 43(4), 486–498 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124510380717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. C.J. Schreck, J.M. Miller, Sources of fear of crime at school: What is the relative contribution of disorder, individual characteristics, and school security? J. Sch. Violence 2(4), 57–79 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1300/J202v02n04_04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan, R. Koestner, A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. DOI (1999). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M.E. Enzle, S.C. Anderson, Surveillant intentions and intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64(2), 257–266 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. M.R. Lepper, D. Greene, Turning play into work: effects of adult surveillance and extrinsic rewards on children’s intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 31(3), 479 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. R.W. Plant, R.M. Ryan, Intrinsic motivation and the effects of self-consciousness, self-awareness, and ego-involvement: an investigation of internally controlling styles. J. Pers. 53(3), 435–449 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00375.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. B.A. Hennessey, If I were secretary of education: Afocus on intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 9(2), 187–192 (2015). doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000012

  50. T.M. Amabile, Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37(2), 221–233 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.2.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. B.A. Hennessey, The social psychology of creativity. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 47(3), 253–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830308601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. S. Dawson, The impact of institutional surveillance technologies on student behaviour. Faculty of Sci. Med. Health–Pap. Pt. A (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Hope, Panopticism, play and the resistance of surveillance: case studies of the observation of student Internet use in UK schools. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 26(3), 359–373 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690500128890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. A.M. Jansen, E. Giebels, T.J. van Rompay, M. Junger, The influence of the presentation of camera surveillance on cheating and pro-social behavior. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01937

  55. P. Bourrat, N. Baumard, R. McKay, Surveillance cues enhance moral condemnation. Evol. Psychol. 9(2), 193–199 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. D. Knox, A good horse runs at the shadow of the whip: surveillance and organizational trust in online learning environments. Can. J. Media Stud. 7 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  57. T. Rooney, Trusting children: how do surveillance technologies alter a child’s experience of trust, risk and responsibility? Surveill. Soc. 7(3/4), 344–355 (2010). https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i3/4.4160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. E.L. Deci, R.M. Ryan, The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53(6), 1024 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. B. Williamson, Decoding classdojo: psycho-policy, social-emotional learning and persuasive educational technologies. Learn. Media Technol. 42(4), 440–453 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. J. Manolev, A. Sullivan, R. Slee, Learning, media and technology the datafication of discipline: classdojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Taylor Francis 44(1), 36–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. E. Taylor, Surveillance schools. Palgrave Macmillan UK (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. S. Wilson, R.M. Laing, Wearable technology: present and future, in 91st World Conference of The Textile Institute (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  63. C. Anderson, K. Anderson, Wearable technology: it has a place in schools-learning & technology library (LearnTechLib), in Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  64. D. Holloway, L. Green, The Internet of toys. Commun. Res. Pract. 2(4), 506–519 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1266124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. V. Geršak, H.S. Vitulic, S. Prosen, G. Starc, I. Humar, G. Geršak, Use of wearable devices to study activity of children in classroom; case study—learning geometry using movement. Comput. Commun. 150, 581–588 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. F. Goh, A. Carroll, R.M. Gillies, A review of the use of portable technologies as observational aids in the classroom. Inform. Learn. Sci. 120(3–4), 228–241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-08-2018-0080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. T. Coffman, M.B. Klinger, Google glass: using wearable technologies to enhance teaching and learning, in Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  68. M. Bower, D. Sturman, What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Comput. Educ. 88, 343–353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. A.C. Borthwick, C.L. Anderson, E.S. Finsness, T.S. Foulger, Special article personal wearable technologies in education: value or villain? J. Dig. Learn. Teach. Educ. 31(3), 85–92 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1021982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. J.N. Gilmore, Securing the kids: geofencing and child wearables. Convergence (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856519882317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. E. Freeman, G. Wilson, S. Brewster, G. Baud-Bovy, C. Magnusson, H. Caltenco, Audible beacons and wearables in schools: Helping young visually impaired children play and move independently, in Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 2017 (New York, NY, USA, 2017), pp. 4146–4157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025518

  72. A.M. Ortiz, S.J. Tueller, S.L. Cook, R.D. Furberg, ActiviTeen: a protocol for deployment of a consumer wearable device in an academic setting. JMIR Res. Protoc. 5(3), e153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. J. Müller, A.M. Hoch, V. Zoller, R. Oberhoffer, Feasibility of physical activity assessment with wearable devices in children aged 4–10 years-a pilot study. Front. Pediatr. 6 (2018). doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00005

  74. V.A. Goodyear, C. Kerner, M. Quennerstedt, Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport Educ. Soc. 24(3), 212–225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. A.J. Mills, R.T. Watson, L. Pitt, J. Kietzmann, Wearing safe: physical and informational security in the age of the wearable device. Bus. Horiz. 59(6), 615–622 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. B. Attallah, Z. Ilagure, Wearable technology: facilitating or complexing education? Int. J. Inform. Educ. Technol. 8(6), 433–436 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.6.1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. F. De Arriba-Pérez, M. Caeiro-Rodríguez, J.M. Santos-Gago, Towards the use of commercial wrist wearables in education, in Proceedings of 2017 4th Experiment at International Conference: Online Experimentation, exp.at 2017 (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2017). pp. 323–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/EXPAT.2017.7984354

  78. K.A. Mackintosh, S.E. Chappel, J. Salmon, A. Timperio, K. Ball, H. Brown, S. Macfarlane, N.D. Ridgers, Parental perspectives of a wearable activity tracker for children younger than 13 years: acceptability and usability study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 7(11) (2019). doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/13858

  79. K.W. Ching, M.M. Singh, Wearable technology devices security and privacy vulnerability analysis. Int. J. Netw. Sec. Appl. 8(3), 19–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5121/.nsa.2016.8302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. M. Wieringa, What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability, in FAT* 2020—Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, (New York, NY, USA, 2020), pp. 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372833

  81. N. Diakopoulos, Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Commun. ACM 59(2), 56–62 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2844110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. A. Goffey, Algorithm, in Software Studies: A Lexicon, ed. by M. Fuller. (MIT Press, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  83. M. Bovens, Analysing and assessing accountability: a conceptual framework. Eur. Law J. 13(4), 447–468 (2007). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x

  84. V. Dignum, Responsible artificial intelligence: designing AI for human values (Springer, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  85. J.A. Kroll, J. Huey, S. Barocas, E.W. Felten, J.R. Reidenberg, D.G. Robinson, H. Yu, Accountable algorithms. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 165(3), 633–705 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  86. W. Orr, J.L. Davis, Attributions of ethical responsibility by artificial intelligence practitioners. Inform. Commun. Soc. 1–17 (2020). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713842

  87. K. Martin, Ethical implications and accountability of algorithms. J. Bus. Ethics 160(4), 835–850 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3921-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. F. Kraemer, K. van Overveld, M. Peterson, Is there an ethics of algorithms? Ethics Inf. Technol. 13(3), 251–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9233-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. I. Cerrillo, A. Martínez, (2019) How can we open the black box of public administration? Transparency and accountability in the use of algorithms. Rev Catalana Dret Public 58, 13–28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2436/rcdp.i58.2019.3277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. S. Garfinkel, J. Matthews, S.S. Shapiro, J.M. Smith, Toward algorithmic transparency and accountability. Commun. ACM 60(9), 5 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3125780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. L. McGregor, D. Murray, V. Ng, International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability. Int. Comp. Law Q. 68(2), 309–343 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. H. Shah, Algorithmic accountability. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376(2128), 20170362 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. J. Torresen, A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI. Front. Robot. AI 4, 75 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2017.00075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. A. Koene, C. Clifton, Y. Hatada, H. Webb, R. Richardson, A governance framework for algorithmic accountability and transparency. (2019). https://doi.org/10.2861/59990

  95. K. Crawford, J. Schultz, AI systems as state actors. Columbia Law Rev. 119, 1941–1972 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  96. K. Martin, Designing ethical algorithms. MIS Q. Executive 18(2) (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  97. Y. Kanellopoulos, A model for evaluating algorithmic systems accountability. arXiv preprint arXiv:180706083 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  98. B.K. Sandall, Wearable technology and schools: where are we and where do we go from here? J. Curr. Teach. Learn. Leadership Educ. 1(1) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  99. H. Strandell, Mobile phones in children’s after-school centres: stretching of place and control. Mobilities 9(2), 256–274 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.802488

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Science and Media Studies, University of Bergen, Fosswinckels gate 6, 5007, Bergen, Norway

    Maria Ovchinnikova, Daniel Ostnes, Arian Garshi, Malin Wist Jakobsen, Jørgen Nyborg-Christensen & Marija Slavkovik

Authors
  1. Maria Ovchinnikova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Ostnes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arian Garshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Malin Wist Jakobsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jørgen Nyborg-Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marija Slavkovik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Sciences, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Mirjana Ivanović

  2. Faculty of Sciences, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

    Aleksandra Klašnja-Milićević

  3. KES International, Selby, UK

    Lakhmi C. Jain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ovchinnikova, M., Ostnes, D., Garshi, A., Jakobsen, M.W., Nyborg-Christensen, J., Slavkovik, M. (2022). Smart Technology in the Classroom: Systematic Review and Prospects for Algorithmic Accountability. In: Ivanović, M., Klašnja-Milićević, A., Jain, L.C. (eds) Handbook on Intelligent Techniques in the Educational Process. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04662-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04662-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04661-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04662-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation