Skip to main content

Towards a Customizable Usage Requirements Cycle

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13335))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1426 Accesses

Abstract

Usage orientation is an essential success factor in development processes. Especially in the mobility sector, development processes concern product combinations of software, hardware and services. These processes require interdisciplinary teams, but both the procedure and the results are shaped by the respective disciplines, such as software development, product design or marketing, and are difficult to access for outsiders. Thus, the flexible application of user-oriented methods remains difficult. The aim of this paper is a scalable process model that flexibly supports the integration of user-oriented methods in development processes and is oriented towards the needs of interdisciplinary development teams. The findings conclude in a concept of a usage requirements cycle supporting the integration of usage requirements especially in the mobility sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bias, R.G., Karat, M.-C.: Justifying cost-justifying usability. In: Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J. (eds.) Cost-Justifying Usability, pp. 1–16. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marcus, A.: User Interface Design’s Return on Investment. In: Bias, R.G., Mayhew, D.J. (eds.) Cost-Justifying Usability, pp. 17–39. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Zowghi, D., da Rimini, F., Bano, M.: Problems and challenges of user involvement in software development. In: EASE 2015, pp. 1–10. ACM, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haberfellner, R., de Weck, O., Fricke, E., Vössner, S.: Systems Engineering: Grundlagen und Anwendung. Orell Füssli Verlag, Zürich (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. International Organization for Standardization: ISO/IEC TR 25060:2010-07, System und Software-Engineering. Beuth, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heisel, M., Krömker, H.: Logische Modellierung von Anwendungswelten aus Benutzersicht. In: NET.OBJECT Days 2002, pp. 649–656. tranSIT, Ilmenau (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theofanos, M.F., Stanton, B.C.: Usability standards across the development lifecycle. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) HCD 2011. LNCS, vol. 6776, pp. 130–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21753-1_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.: DIN EN ISO 9241-210:2020-03, Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion – Teil 210. Beuth, Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayhew, D.J.: Usability Engineering Lifecycle. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarodnick, F., Brau, H.: Methoden der Usability Evaluation. Hogrefe, Bundesstadt (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gundelsweiler, F., Memmel, T., Reiterer, H.: Agile usability engineering. In: M&C 2004, pp.33–42. Oldenbourg Verlag, München (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folmer, E., van Gurp, J., Bosch, J.: Software architecture analysis of usability. In: Bastide, R., Palanque, P., Roth, J. (eds.) DSV-IS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3425, pp. 38–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431879_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kashfi, P., Feldt, R., Nilsson, A.: Integrating UX principles and practices into software development organizations. J. Syst. Softw. 154, 37–58 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Meier, J.J., Conkling, T.W.: Google scholar’s coverage of the engineering literature. J. Acad. Librariansh. 34(3), 196–201 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gläser, J., Laudel, G.: Experteninterviews und Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotonya, G., Sommerville, I.: Requirements Engineering. Wiley, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S.: Requirements engineering. In: ICSE 2000, pp. 35–46. ACM, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes, J.M., Machado, R.J.: Requirements in Engineering Projects. Springer, Berlin (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18597-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cindy Mayas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mayas, C. (2022). Towards a Customizable Usage Requirements Cycle. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04986-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04987-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics