Abstract
Driving could result in driver’s overload if the demands of the tasks are beyond the attentional capacity of the driver, which is the main cause of poor driving performance and high car accident risks. As the use of automation is becoming increasingly common, it provides the potential to reduce such risks. However, when automation relieves the driver from continuous driving tasks, underload may occur. The study investigated driver’s mental workload in partially automated vehicles and conventional vehicles under different traffic density conditions. Eight participants “drove” a simulated vehicle on a 10 mile straight, two-way rural interstate highway in 4 scenarios (2 (traffic density: Low, High) × 2 (vehicle type: Partially automated vehicle, Conventional vehicle) in random order. Data was recorded using a STISIM driving simulator, a Tobbi pro glasses 2 eye tracking device, and a NIRSport system. Workload was evaluated from subjective method (NASA-TLX questionnaire) and objective physiological methods (eye pupil diameter and oxygenated hemoglobin). The findings indicate the importance of combining different approaches to evaluate workload in driving.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D’Esposito, M., Postle, B.R., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E.: The neural substrate and temporal dynamics of interference effects in working memory as revealed by event-related functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96(13), 7514–7519 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7514
Di Flumeri, G., et al.: EEG-based mental workload neurometric to evaluate the impact of different traffic and road conditions in real driving settings. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00509
Engström, J., Johansson, E., Östlund, J.: Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 97–120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012
Hart, S. G.: NASA-task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. PsycEXTRA Dataset (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/e577632012-009
Heikoop, D.D., De Winter, J.C., Van Arem, B., Stanton, N.A.: Acclimatizing to automation: driver workload and stress during partially automated car following in real traffic. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 65, 503–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.024
Jamson, A.H., Merat, N., Carsten, O.M., Lai, F.C.: Behavioural changes in drivers experiencing highly-automated vehicle control in varying traffic conditions. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 30, 116–125 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.008
Lohani, M., Payne, B.R., Strayer, D.L.: A review of psychophysiological measures to assess cognitive states in real-world driving. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00057
Liu, Y., Zhao, R., Li, T., Li, Y.: An Investigation of the impact of autonomous driving on driving behavior in traffic jam. In: IIE Annual Conference, Norcross, pp. 986–991 (2021)
Paas, F., Vanmerrienboer, J.J.G.: The efficiency of instructional conditions – an approach to combine mental effort and performance-measures. Hum. Factors 35(4), 737–743 (1993)
Palinko, O., Kun, A.L., Shyrokov, A., Heeman, P.: Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications - ETRA 2010 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743701
Pauzié, A.: A method to assess the driver mental workload: the Driving Activity Load Index (DALI). IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2(4), 315 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its:20080023
Recarte, M.A., Nunes, L.M.: Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 9(2), 119–137 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898x.9.2.119
SAE International (2016). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems (NoJ3016). https://doi.org/10.4271/J3016_201401
Sibi, S., Ayaz, H., Kuhns, D.P., Sirkin, D.M., Ju, W.: Monitoring driver cognitive load using functional near infrared spectroscopy in partially autonomous cars. In: 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2016.7535420
Sibi, S., Baiters, S., Mok, B., Steiner, M., Ju, W.: Assessing driver cortical activity under varying levels of automation with functional near infrared spectroscopy. In: 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ivs.2017.7995923
Stapel, J., Mullakkal-Babu, F.A., Happee, R.: Automated driving reduces perceived workload, but monitoring causes higher cognitive load than manual driving. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 60, 590–605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.11.006
Unni, A., Ihme, K., Jipp, M., Rieger, J.W.: Assessing the driver’s current level of working memory load with high density functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a realistic driving simulator study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00167
Villringer, A.: Non-invasive optical spectroscopy and imaging of human brain function. Trends Neurosci. 20(10), 435–442 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01132-6
Wierwille, W.W., Eggemeier, F.T.: Recommendations for mental workload measurement in a test and evaluation environment. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 35(2), 263–281 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500205
Wilson, K.M., Yang, S., Roady, T., Kuo, J., Lenné, M.G.: Driver trust & mode confusion in an on-road study of level-2 automated vehicle technology. Saf. Sci. 130, 104845 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104845
Xu, Y., Graber, H.L., Barbour, R. L.: NirsLAB: a computing environment FOR FNIRS neuroimaging data analysis. Biomed. Opt. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/biomed.2014.bm3a.1
Yoshino, K., Oka, N., Yamamoto, K., Takahashi, H., Kato, T.: Functional brain imaging using near-infrared spectroscopy during actual driving on an expressway. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00882
Zhao, R., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Tokgoz, B.: An investigation of resilience in human driving and automatic driving in freight transportation system. In: IIE Annual Conference, Norcross, pp. 974–979 (2021)
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the Center for Advances in Port Management (CAPM) at Lamar University. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CAPM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, R., Liu, Y., Li, T., Li, Y. (2022). A Preliminary Evaluation of Driver’s Workload in Partially Automated Vehicles. In: Krömker, H. (eds) HCI in Mobility, Transport, and Automotive Systems. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13335. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04987-3_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04986-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04987-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)