Abstract
The aging of society, an increasing shortage of skilled professionals, and the digitization of the healthcare sector will continue to intensify in the future. To meet these challenges, new developments in the field of health technologies, such as digital therapy or teletherapy, are gaining importance.
The aim of the present study was to investigate speech and language pathologists’ (SLPs) acceptance of apps and digital resources for interventions. Guided expert interviews with practicing SLPs (N = 5) were conducted focusing self-assessment of technical competence, technology use and reasons for non-use, experience of using apps, conditions of use, assessment of effort, barriers, and potentials.
Results show that although all interviewees rated both the potential of apps and digital resources for the quality of their work and their own technical competencies as high, only two out of five regularly used digital resources in their daily work. Feedback from the clients on the use of apps in therapy is predominantly positive. In contrast, the effort required to obtain the apps, to learn how to use them, and for the initial preparation are high. The equipment of the therapy rooms with devices and WLAN access and the support provided by co-workers and supervisors are also rated as inadequate. Regarding their attitudes toward technology, the therapists’ self-image and rather conservative mindsets toward digital technologies are described as hindering.
The study revealed that the structural environment and various personality traits of the therapists have great relevance for the use digital resources in speech and language therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In Germany, there are several possible ways to become a SLP. One way is through vocational training to become a state-approved speech therapist, another is through academic studies in speech therapy, clinical linguistics, patholinguistics, or speech therapy education.
References
Alber, B., Starke, A.: Digitale Kompetenzen von Sprachtherapeut*innen – Therapieren (DioST-T). Forschung Sprache 2, 3–11 (2021)
Bilda, K.: Grundlagen. Potenziale und Barrieren. In: Bilda, K., Mühlhaus, J., Ritterfeld, U. (eds.) Neue Technologien in der Sprachtherapie, pp. 20–34. Thieme, Stuttgart (2017)
Beushausen, U.: Teletherapie in der Logopädie im deutschsprachigen Raum: Ein Überblick über aktuelle Studienergebnisse. Forum Logopädie 25(3), 6–10 (2021)
Leinweber, J., Schulz, K.: Digitalisierung in der Aphasietherapie – eine ethische Betrachtung. Aphasie und verwandte Gebiete 46, 34–41 (2019)
Starke, A., Mühlhaus, J., Ritterfeld, U.: Neue Medien in Therapie und Unterricht für Kinder mit dem Förderschwerpunkt Sprache. Praxis Sprache 61(1), 28–32 (2016)
Liu, L., Miguel Cruz, A., Rios Rincon, A., Buttar, V., Ranson, Q., Goertzen, D.X.: What factors determine therapists’ acceptance of new technologies for rehabilitation – a study using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Disabil. Rehabil. 37(5), 447–455 (2015)
Schäfer, M., Keppler, D.: Modelle der technikorientierten Akzeptanzforschung. http://www.depositonce.tu-berlin.de/handle/11303/4758. Accessed 7 Jan 2022
Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)
Hill, R.J., Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Contemp. Sociol. 6(2), 244 (1977)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., Davis, G.B.: User acceptance of information technology. Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)
Venkatesh, V., Thong, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157 (2012)
Shachak, A., Kuziemsky, C., Petersen, C.: Beyond TAM and UTAUT: Future directions for HIT implementation research. J. Biomed. Inform. 100, 103315 (2019)
Lauer, N.: Teletherapie – hat die Logopädie eine digitale Zukunft? Ergebnisse eines qualitativen Forschungsprojekts des Studiengangs Logopädie der OTH Regensburg. Forum Logopädie 34(5), 12–17 (2020). https://www.hs-bremen.de/internet/studium/stg/atw/ljclauer_2020_teletherapie.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2021
Bilda, K., Dörr, F., Urban, K., Tschuschke, B.: Digitale logopädische Therapie. Ergebnisse einer Befragung zum aktuellen Ist-Stand aus Sicht von LogopädInnen. Logos 28(3), 176–183 (2020)
Jakob, H., Späth, M.: Sprachtherapeutische Apps am Beispiel neolexon: Herausforderungen beim Zugang in die Versorgung und Chancen für Therapeuten und Patienten. Sprache Stimme Gehör 45(01), 17–21 (2021)
Malchus, K.: Evaluation emotionaler und kommunikativer Verhaltensweisen in Mensch-Roboter Interaktionen in therapierelevanten Szenarien. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2784346/2784347/diss_malchus.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2021
Albudoor, N., Peña, E.D.: Factors influencing US speech and language therapists’ use of technology for clinical practice. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 56(3), 567–582 (2021)
Kruse, J., Schmieder, C., Weber, K.M., Dresing, T., Pehl, T.: Qualitative Interviewforschung. Ein integrativer Ansatz, 2nd edn. Beltz, Weinheim (2015)
Helfferich, C.: Die Qualität qualitativer Daten. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91858-7
Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W.: Interviews mit Experten. Eine praxisorientierte Einführung. Springer, Wiesbaden (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19416-5
Kuckartz, U.: Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. Springer, Wiesbaden (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92126-6
MAXQDA. https://www.maxqda.com. Accessed 20 July 2021
Dirks, S., Bühler, C.: Assistive technologies for people with cognitive impairments – which factors influence technology acceptance? In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2018. LNCS, vol. 10907, pp. 503–516. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92049-8_36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Szabó, B., Dirks, S., Scherger, AL. (2022). Apps and Digital Resources in Speech and Language Therapy - Which Factors Influence Therapists’ Acceptance?. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Novel Design Approaches and Technologies. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05028-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05028-2_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05027-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05028-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)