Skip to main content

An Exploratory Study on the Low Adoption Rate of Smart Canes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13309))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

People who are blind and visually impaired (BVI) primarily rely on white canes for everyday mobility. Smart canes were introduced to address the limitations of traditional white canes and to inform users of their surroundings more efficiently. While the smart cane’s advantages are evident, these devices are not used often in the BVI community. To gain a better understanding of the low adoption rate, we spoke with orientation and mobility specialists for some background on BVI mobility, conducted a survey to gauge user awareness and initial perceptions of the smart cane, and interviewed 16 participants for an in-depth view regarding their smart cane experiences. While most of the participants’ apprehension was based on initial product cost, we found that other factors like user personality, durability, battery life, experience bias, as well as the lack of awareness from the users all contribute to the low adoption rate of smart canes. As such, our findings are structured based on four main themes: (1) Impact of Participant Characteristics on Adoption, (2) Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages, (3) Product-Related Concerns, and (4) Building Trust. We contribute a user-centered investigation on the merits of the smart cane and suggestions for future design considerations based on user feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 10 fascinating facts about the white cane. https://www.perkins.org/stories/10-fascinating-facts-about-the-white-cane. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  2. Bawa cane. https://www.bawa.tech. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  3. Guiding eyes FAQ. https://www.guidingeyes.org/about/faqs/. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  4. Smartcane overview. http://smartcane.saksham.org/overview/. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  5. Ultracane. https://www.ultracane.com/ultracane. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  6. Wewalk smart cane for visually impaired and blind people. https://wewalk.io/en/. Accessed 26 Mar 2021

  7. Akash, S., Rahman, M.: QFD-based smart cane design: a technology to assist visually impaired. Int. J. Bus. Anal. Intell. 6(1), 25 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Asad, S., Mooney, B., Ahmad, I., Huber, M., Clark, A.: Object detection and sensory feedback techniques in building smart cane for the visually impaired: an overview. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 1–7 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Branig, M., Engel, C.: Smartcane: an active cane to support blind people through virtual mobility training. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 327–328 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buchs, G., Simon, N., Maidenbaum, S., Amedi, A.: Waist-up protection for blind individuals using the eyecane as a primary and secondary mobility aid. Restorative Neurol. Neurosci. 35(2), 225–235 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen, Q., Khan, M., Tsangouri, C., Yang, C., Li, B., Xiao, J., Zhu, Z.: CCNY smart cane. In: 2017 IEEE 7th Annual International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), pp. 1246–1251. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deverell, L., et al.: Use of technology by orientation and mobility professionals in Australia and Malaysia before covid-19. Disability Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guerrero, J.C., Quezada-V, C., Chacon-Troya, D.: Design and implementation of an intelligent cane, with proximity sensors, GPS localization and GSM feedback. In: 2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hogan, C.L.: Stigma, embarrassment and the use of mobility aids. Int. J. Orientation Mob. 5(1), 49–52 (2012). https://doi.org/10.21307/ijom-2012-009

  15. Hollyfield, R.L., Foulke, E.: The spatial cognition of blind pedestrians. J. Vis. Impairment Blindness 77(5), 204–210 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan, I., Khusro, S., Ullah, I.: Technology-assisted white cane: evaluation and future directions. Peer J. 6, e6058 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kim, S.Y., Cho, K.: Usability and design guidelines of smart canes for users with visual impairments. Int. J. Des. 7(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lindley, J., Coulton, P., Sturdee, M.: Implications for adoption. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 265–277. CHI 2017, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025742, https://doi-org.ezproxy.rit.edu/10.1145/3025453.3025742

  19. Maidenbaum, S., et al.: The ’eyecane’, a new electronic travel aid for the blind: technology, behavior & swift learning. Restorative Neurol. Neurosci. 32(6), 813–824 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-130351

  20. Manduchi, R., Kurniawan, S.: Watch your head, mind your step: mobility-related accidents experienced by people with visual impairment. Dept. Comp. Eng., Univ. California, Santa Cruz, Tech. Rep (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez, M., Constantinescu, A., Schauerte, B., Koester, D., Stiefelhagen, R.: Cognitive evaluation of haptic and audio feedback in short range navigation tasks. In: Miesenberger, K., Fels, D., Archambault, D., Peňáz, P., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8548, pp. 128–135. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08599-9_20

  22. Megalingam, R.K., Nambissan, A., Thambi, A., Gopinath, A., Nandakumar, M.: Sound and touch based smart cane: better walking experience for visually challenged. In: 2014 IEEE Canada International Humanitarian Technology Conference-(IHTC), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Messaoudi, M.D., Menelas, B.A.J., Mcheick, H.: Autonomous smart white cane navigation system for indoor usage. Technologies 8(3), 37 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Milallos, R., Tibdewal, V., Wang, Y., Ogueh Udegbe, A., Oh, T.: " would the smart cane benefit me?": perceptions of the visually impaired towards smart canes. In: The 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 1–3 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  25. MP Hoogsteen, K., A. Osinga, S., LPA Steenbekkers, B., FA Szpiro, S.: Functionality versus inconspicuousness: attitudes of people with low vision towards OST smart glasses. In: The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418012, https://doi-org.ezproxy.rit.edu/10.1145/3373625.3418012

  26. Nasser, A., Keng, K.N., Zhu, K.: Thermalcane: exploring thermotactile directional cues on cane-grip for non-visual navigation. In: The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3417004, https://doi-org.ezproxy.rit.edu/10.1145/3373625.3417004

  27. Pariti, J., Oh, T.: Understanding the hand and wrist strains caused by smart cane handles with haptic notification. In: The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS 2020, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418028,https://doi-org.ezproxy.rit.edu/10.1145/3373625.3418028

  28. Roentgen, U.R., Gelderblom, G.J., Soede, M., De Witte, L.P.: Inventory of electronic mobility aids for persons with visual impairments: a literature review. J. Vis. Impairment Blindness 102(11), 702–724 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Routson, R.L., Bailey, M., Pumford, I., Czerniecki, J.M., Aubin, P.M.: A smart cane with vibrotactile biofeedback improves cane loading for people with knee osteoarthritis. In: 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3370–3373. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Saaid, M.F., Mohammad, A., Ali, M.M.: Smart cane with range notification for blind people. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), pp. 225–229. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sakhardande, J., Pattanayak, P., Bhowmick, M.: Smart cane assisted mobility for the visually impaired. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 6(10), 1262–1265 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. dos Santos, A.D.P., Ferrari, A.L.M., Medola, F.O., Sandnes, F.E.: Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disability Rehabil. Assistive Technol. 1–7 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308

  33. Shinohara, K., Wobbrock, J.O.: In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 705–714. CHI 2011, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044

  34. Strong, P.: The history of the white cane (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wahab, M.H.A., et al.: Smart cane: assistive cane for visually-impaired people. arXiv preprint arXiv:1110.5156 (2011)

  36. Yoo, D., Ernest, A., Serholt, S., Eriksson, E., Dalsgaard, P.: Service design in HCI research: the extended value co-creation model. In: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019, pp. 1–8 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rezylle Milallos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Milallos, R., Tibdewal, V., Wang, Y., Udegbe, A., Oh, T. (2022). An Exploratory Study on the Low Adoption Rate of Smart Canes. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05038-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05039-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics