Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Study on Consensus Building Mechanism Based on Kansei ~Consideration of Experimental Tasks that Cause Conflicts~

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13302))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1811 Accesses

Abstract

We are engaged in a variety of consensus-building activities in our daily lives. In order to build consensus, it is necessary to reach a single conclusion unanimously. Therefore, if there are conflicting opinions, they need to be resolved. To deal with this problem, it is necessary to conduct pleasant communication during consensus building in order for both parties to keep a good relationship, and Kansei has been found to be important for this purpose. Until now, there have not been many studies from the perspective of “Kansei”. And in actual important consensus-building situations, the interlocutors are confident and particular about their opinions, and they often do not bend their opinions to each other, which causes conflicts. In order to simulate such situation to conduct a consensus building experiment, it is necessary to develop tasks that allow the experimental participants to engage seriously even in the laboratory room. Therefore, in this study, we have attempted to develop a new task meeting three requirements; (1) The process of consensus building does not involve concessions but conflicts. (2) Sufficient time and the number of statements for consensus building can be secured for analysis. (3) The process of consensus building can be observed and recorded in detail. And we conducted consensus-building experiments using the developed task. As a result, it was found that there was no ceding and conflicts occur, and that the time and number of statements required for process analysis of consensus building might be more than those in our previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. David, S., Thomas, C.L.: How to Make Collaboration Work: Powerful Ways to Build Consensus, Solve Problems, and Make Decisions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., Sethna, B.: The equalization phenomenon: status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Hum. Comput. Interact. 6(2), 119–146 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Walther, J.B., Anderson, J.F., Park, D.W.: Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Commun. Res. 21(4), 460–487 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tei, S., Kamagichi, T., Sim, T., Shiizuka, H.: Understanding and supporting users to improve atmosphere of communication by Kansei agents. ISASE 2020, 6 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hamada, Y., Maruyama, T., Shoji, H.: Pattern classification of value creative consensus building process in case of multiple-choice. Int. J. Affect. Eng. 18(3), 129–136 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas, D.S., Kirk, V.P.: Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees. Apidologie 35(2), 101–116 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Suzuki, S., Adachi, R., Dunne, S., Bossaerts, P., O’Doherty, J.P.: Neural mechanisms under-lying human consensus decision-making. Neuron 86(2), 591–602 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okutani, T., Kobayashi, M., Nambu, H.: Case study of consensus building for enhancement of the regional disaster resilience. Soc. Soc. Manag. Syst. Internet J. 4(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishikawa, M.: A study on community-based reconstruction from Great East Japan earthquake disaster – a case study of Iwanuma City in Miyagi-Pref. J. Disast. Res. 10(5), 807–817 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakamoto, Y., et al.: A trial of revealing consensus building mechanism based on Kansei. Hum Interface Cybor. Colloq. 399–406 (2020). (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ito, K., et al.: An experimental study on “consensus to match” game for analyzing emotional interaction in consensus building process. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 13094, pp. 54–62. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90238-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberd, L.R.: Language and individual differences: the search for universals in personality lexicons. Rev. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2, 141–165 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Namikawa, T., Tani, I., Wakita, T., Kumagai, R., Nakasone, A., Noguchi, H.: Development of a short form of the Japanese big-five scale, and a test of its reliability and validity. Jpn. J. Psychol. 83(2), 91–99 (2012). (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yoshiki Sakamoto

    Present address: Nomura Research Institute, Ltd., Chiyoda, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

    Ryota Kamakari, Mizuki Yamawaki, Yoshiki Sakamoto, Kimi Ueda, Hirotake Ishii & Hiroshi Shimoda

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Information and Computer Science, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Japan

    Kyoko Ito

Authors
  1. Ryota Kamakari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mizuki Yamawaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshiki Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kimi Ueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hirotake Ishii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hiroshi Shimoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kyoko Ito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryota Kamakari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University of Japan, Chiba, Japan

    Masaaki Kurosu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kamakari, R. et al. (2022). A Study on Consensus Building Mechanism Based on Kansei ~Consideration of Experimental Tasks that Cause Conflicts~. In: Kurosu, M. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Theoretical Approaches and Design Methods. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13302. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05311-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05310-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05311-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation