Skip to main content

An Epistemological Analysis of the “Brain in a Vat” Approach for the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Business, Government and Organizations (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13327))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) attempts to model the human mind and processes. It has became clear that the interest of scientists in modelling human thought is inextricably linked to the brain, language, and physical body. Hilary Putnam is one of many researchers who have researched this area. His study called The Brain in the Vat has attracted a lot of attention for philosophers. The most important issue he raises in this article is the concept of the Brain in Vat, focusing on the development of brain, body, and language issues. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the causes of the Brain in the vat hypothesis and the interaction between the brain and the physical body for artificial intelligence. Since the argument is whether it is impossible to know if someone is the brain of a vessel. In principle, it is impossible to deny that you are the brain of the vessel, so there is no good reason to believe what you believe. The dubious argument argues that they cannot be known and raises issues related to the definition of knowledge. An example of this is the Brain in Vat hypothesis. It is necessary to study not only artificial intelligence scientists but also philosophers, neuroscientists, psychologists, medical scientists, physicists and many other scientists. It would be ethical to conduct human-centred artificial intelligence research in this way; always develop a link between artificial intelligence and the physical body in order to develop epistemological hypotheses in the philosophy of artificial intelligencee. In order to develop artificial intelligence, it is necessary to combine brain function and physical body interaction together. It is more important to develop and direct the activities of human-centred robots than to promote robots beyond the human mind. Although neuroscience is developing rapidly, not all the secrets of the brain have been revealed yet. Therefore, it is important to develop many interesting hypotheses from the philosophical and linguistic point of view for artificial intelligence. Many scientists have found that collaborative research is more likely to lead to better results. The development of human-centered artificial intelligence can bring positive technological and economic advances to humanity in many ways. The challenge is to direct and use this new evolution in a timely manner. When it comes to artificial intelligence, the question of the physical body is always on the agenda. Hilary Putnam’s Brain in A Vat is important not only to show many researchers what is possible and what is not possible but also to remind them what to focus on in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Putnam, H.: Brains in a vat, chap. 1. In: Reason, Truth, and History, pp. 1–21. Cambridge University Press (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Forbes, G.: Realism and skepticism: brains in a vat revisited. J. Philos. 92(4), 205–222 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brueckner, A.: A priori knowledge of the world not easily available. Philos. Stud. 104, 109–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010374904795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Warfield, T.A.: A priori knowledge of the world: knowing the world by knowing our minds. Philos. Stud. Int. J. Philos. Anal. Tradit. 92(1/2, A), 127–147 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, E., Cosmelli, D.: Brain in a vat or body in a world? Brainbound versus enactive views of experience. Philos. Top. 39(1), 163–180 (2011). Embodiment

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huemer, M.: Serious theories and skeptical theories: why you are probably not a brain in a vat. Philos. Stud. Int. J. Philos. Anal. Tradit. 173(4), 1031–1052 (2016). Special Issue: Perceptual Evidence

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hetherington, S.: Re: brains in a vat. Dialectica 54(4), 307–311 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman, A.H.: The under determination argument for brain-in-the-vat scepticism. Analysis 67(1), 32–36 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, P.: Could we be brains in a vat? Can. J. Philos. 14(1), 115–123 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harrison, J.: Professor Putnam on brains in vats. Erkenntnis 23(1), 55–57 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nath, R.: Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Critique of the Mechanistic Theory of Mind. Universal-Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA (2009). Chapter 3, pp. 96–100

    Google Scholar 

  12. Susser, D.: Artificial intelligence and the body: Dreyfus, Bickhard, and the future of AI. In: Müller, V. (eds.) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol. 5, p. 279. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_21

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Batnasan Luvaanjalba .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Luvaanjalba, B., Su, Bc. (2022). An Epistemological Analysis of the “Brain in a Vat” Approach for the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. In: Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Siau, K. (eds) HCI in Business, Government and Organizations. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13327. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05544-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05544-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05543-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05544-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics