Skip to main content

Do We Speak the Same Language? The Effect of Emojis on Learners in an Online Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI in Games (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13334))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1514 Accesses

Abstract

Emojis are quickly spreading in text-based communication. Accordingly, most students and teachers in an online learning environment integrate their online text communication with emojis to explain or support their perspective. However, because of the variation in students and teachers’ age, gender and culture, it was essential to ensure that students and teachers have the same understanding of used emojis. Consequently, we ran our study to ask students and teachers about their interpretations of the most common emojis. The results show moderate agreement between students and teachers. For example, was interpreted as ‘perfect’ by students and ‘punishment’ by teachers. This variation in interpretation must be resolved to ensure acceptable online communication between students and teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Annamalai, S., Salam, S.: Undergraduates’ interpretation on WhatsApp smiley emoji. Jurnal Komunikasi, Malays. J. Commun. 33(4), 89–103 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ares, G., Vidal, L., Jaeger, S.R.: How do consumers use emoji in a food-related context? Insights for the design and interpretation of emoji questionnaires. J. Sensory Stud. 36(4), e12663 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbieri, F., Ballesteros, M., Ronzano, F., Saggion, H.: Multimodal emoji prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02392 (2018)

  4. Das, G., Wiener, H.J., Kareklas, I.: To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. J. Bus. Res. 96, 147–156 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eisner, B., Rocktäschel, T., Augenstein, I., Bošnjak, M., Riedel, S.: emoji2vec: learning emoji representations from their description. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08359 (2016)

  6. Herring, S.C., Dainas, A.R.: Receiver interpretations of emoji functions: a gender perspective. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media (Emoji2018), Stanford, CA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herring, S.C., Dainas, A.R.: Gender and age influences on interpretation of emoji functions. ACM Trans. Soc. Comput. 3(2), 1–26 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kousar, A., Memon, S., Simming, I.A.: The pragmatic analysis of emojis by ESL learners in verbal modalities: a case study of whatsapp chat. IJCSNS 20(10), 199 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, W., Chen, Y., Hu, T., Luo, J.: Mining the relationship between emoji usage patterns and personality. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ljubešić, N., Fišer, D.: A global analysis of emoji usage. In: Proceedings of the 10th Web as Corpus Workshop, pp. 82–89 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, H., Kluver, D., Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L., Hecht, B.: Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: the role of text in emoji-related miscommunication. In: Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 11, pp. 152–161 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, H.J., Thebault-Spieker, J., Chang, S., Johnson, I., Terveen, L., Hecht, B.: “Blissfully happy” or “ready tofight”: varying interpretations of emoji. In: Tenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sher, A.: Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in web-based online learning environment. J. Interact. Online Learn. 8(2), 102–120 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, Y., Hew, K.F.: Emoticon, emoji, and sticker use in computer-mediated communication: a review of theories and research findings. Int. J. Commun. 13, 27 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tigwell, G.W., Flatla, D.R.: Oh that’s what you meant! reducing emoji misunderstanding. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, pp. 859–866 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wad Ghaban .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ghaban, W. (2022). Do We Speak the Same Language? The Effect of Emojis on Learners in an Online Learning Environment. In: Fang, X. (eds) HCI in Games. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13334. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05637-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05636-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05637-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics