Abstract
The trend of curricular reforms in recent years has been to promote the scientific learning of students, the Peruvian curriculum, through the curricular area of Science and Technology, poses as one of the skills that must be developed in students is the so-called “Design and build technological solutions to solve problems in your environment”, whose products are evaluated at an institutional level for the Eureka Science and Technology Fair contest, however many of these need to be strengthened with aspects of creativity at the design level of the technologies, therefore, we set as an objective, to implement Design Thinking to develop competence in the design and construction of technological solutions to solve problems in their environment in female secondary school students in the Science and Technology course, during remote classes. Applying the intervention based on design thinking from the IDEO proposal, considering functional creativity and various cognitive scaffolds developed in electronic learning, the results were favorable, achieving significant differences in the evaluation scores obtained before and after in the first and second phase of the execution of the intervention achieving a Level of significance = 1%, the students were able to identify an alternative technological solution to the problem presented, design the alternative technological solution, implement it and go through the validation process to comply with the specifications of design and operation and evaluates and communicates the operation and impacts of its technological solution alternative.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aranda, M.L., Lie, R., Selcen Guzey, S.: Productive thinking in middle school science students’ design conversations in a design-based engineering challenge. Int. J. Technol. Design Educ. (2019). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-019-09498-5
Cederqvist, A.-M.: Pupils’ ways of understanding programmed technological solutions when analysing structure and function. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(2), 1039–1065 (2019). https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-019-10006-4
Cropley, D., Cropley, A.: Recognizing and fostering creativity in technological design education. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 20(3), 345–358 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-009-9089-5
de Vries, M.J.: What do students in dutch technology teacher programmes think of their subject? Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 9(2), 173–179 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514910090205
Freitas da Silva, I.: Describing the design thinking and extreme programming activities during a technology innovation academic workshop. Innov. Manag. Rev. 17(3), 267–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-03-2019-0039
Hassan, D.K.: Discrepancy of divergent thinking techniques and functional creativity: comparative study of structural and procedural techniques in architectural design. Ain Shams Engineering Magazine Comparative Study of Structural and Procedural Techniques In Machine Translate-ed by Google (2016)
Herianto, Wilujeng, I.: Students and teachers’ necessity toward science interactive multimedia e-books based on local potential of gamelan to increase students’ curiosity. In: W. A., Pujianto, A. N.A., & D. M.I.B.M. (eds.) vol. 1440, Is-sue Institute of Physics Publishing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012100
IDEO: Design thinking para educadores. Res. Technol. Manage. 55(3), 10–14 (2012). https://www.ideo.com/post/design-thinking-for-educators
IDEO: The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design (2nd ed.). (2015). Retrieved April 20, 2021, https://www.ideo.com/post/design-kit
1MINEDU. Curriculum program for Secondary Education. National Curriculum 259 (2016). https://cutt.ly/TTlBR1F
Macedo, M., Miguel, P.A., Casarotto, F.N.: A characterization of design thinking as a model of innovation. Manag. Innov. Rev. Rai 12, 157–182 (2015). www.revistas.usp.br/rai/article/view/101357, https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i3.101357
Ministry of Education of Peru. Vice Ministerial Resolution. No. 235-2021-MINEDU. Virtual Educational Contests 2021 General and Specific Rules (2021). https://acortar.link/JyD2Os
National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research, CONICYT. Science and Technology in Chile: What for? vol. 1, no. 1 (2011). https://www.conicyt.cl/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/CyTConicytparaque.pdf. ISBN 978-956-7524-12-9
Nugroho, T.A.T., Surjono, H.D.: The effectiveness of mobile-based interactive learning multimedia in science process skills. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1157(2), 022024 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022024
Priscylio, G., Anwar, S., Salmawati: Need of e-integrated science teaching material developed using 4S TMD model for science learning and teaching in junior high school. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and E-Learning - IC4E (2019). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3306500.3306563
Ruki, U.A., Wulandari, A.A.A.: Post covid-19 public space adaptation: a case study of building entrances in Jakarta. 794(1) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012243
Schwab, K.: The fourth industrial revolution (2016)
Sampieri, H.: Metodología de la investigación 5ta Edición (5ta ed.) (2010). ISBN 978-9 968-422-931-3, https://acortar.link/JyD2Os
Santos, A., Bianchi, C., Borini, F.: Open innovation and co-creation in new product development: the role of design thinking. Int. J. Innov. 6, 112–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v6i2.203
Soroko, N., Mykhailenko, L., Rokoman, O., y Zaselskiy, V.,: Educational electronic platforms for STEAM-oriented learning environment at general education school (eds.), vol. 2643, pp. 462–473. CEUR-WS (2020). https://lib.iitta.gov.ua/721185/1/cte2019-paper15-final-paper.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Arbulú Pérez Vargas, C.G., Gómez Fuertes, A., Reyes Pérez, M.D., Espino Carrasco, D.K., Rojas Palacios, L.E. (2022). Design Thinking for the Construction of Technological Solutions in a Science Course in a Virtual Environment. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Novel Technological Environments. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13329. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05675-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05675-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05674-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05675-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)