Skip to main content

Model-Driven Production of Data-Centric Infographics: An Application to the Impact Measurement Domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2022)

Abstract

Context and motivation: Infographics are an engaging medium for communication. Sometimes, organisations create several infographics with the same graphic design and different data; e.g., when reporting on impact measurement. Question/problem: The conventional process to produce such recurrent data-centric infographics causes rework related to the disconnection between software environments. Principal ideas/results: This paper redesigns the process following the model-driven engineering paradigm. We present a domain-specific language to model infographics, and an interpreter that generates the infographics automatically. We have been able to model and generate infographics that report impact measurement results, which the participants of a comparative experiment have found as attractive as the original ones, and that are hard, but not impossible, to distinguish from them. Contribution: An innovative model-driven approach that eliminates the software environment disconnection and could facilitate the use of data-centric infographics for reporting purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Originally named openSEA, since 2020 the tool has been renamed openESEA, to include the business ethics dimension, also sometimes referred to as governance topics.

  2. 2.

    https://reas.red.

  3. 3.

    https://reasnet.com/intranet/docs/informes-e-infografias-de-la-campana-ensena-el-corazon-2020.

  4. 4.

    The code of the interpreter can be found here: https://github.com/nielsrowinbik/open-sea.

  5. 5.

    https://competa.com.

References

  1. Smiciklas, M.: The Power of Infographics: Using Pictures to Communicate and Connect with Your Audiences. Que Publishing, New York (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Dunlap, J.C., Lowenthal, P.R.: Getting graphic about infographics: design lessons learned from popular infographics. J. Vis. Literacy 35, 42ā€“59 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Oā€™Neil, C., Schutt, R.: Doing Data Science: Straight Talk from the Frontline. Oā€™Reilly (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. EspaƱa, S., Bik, N., Overbeek, S.: Model-driven engineering support for social and environmental accounting. In: RCIS 2019. IEEE (2019)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Mernik, M., Heering, J., Sloane, A.M.: When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Comput. Surv. 37(4), 316ā€“344 (2005)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Wieringa, R.J.: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    BookĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Karagiannis, D.: Agile modeling method engineering. In: 19th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI 2015), pp. 5ā€“10. ACM, Athens, Greece (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Behrens, H., et al. and Contributors: Xtext user guide v 1.0.1 (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Martix, S., Hodson, J.: Teaching with infographics: practising new digital competencies and visual literacies (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Arcia, A., et al.: Sometimes more is more: iterative participatory design of infographics for engagement of community members with varying levels of health literacy. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 23(1), 174ā€“183 (2016)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Amit-Danhi, E.R., Shifman, L.: Digital political infographics: a rhetorical palette of an emergent genre. New Media Soc. 20(10), 3540ā€“3559 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Thoma, B., et al.: The impact of social media promotion with infographics and podcasts on research dissemination and readership. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 20(2), 300ā€“306 (2018)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Iannaci, D.: Reporting tools for social enterprises: between impact measurement and stakeholder needs. Eur. J. Soc. Impact Circ. Econ. 1(1b), 1ā€“18 (2020)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Afrizal, D.: Statistical infographic publication: embracing the general public. In: Conference of European Statisticians. UNECE, Online (2021)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Otten, J.J., Cheng, K., Drewnowski, A.: Infographics and public policy: using data visualization to convey complex information. Health Aff. 34(11), 1901ā€“1907 (2015)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Mackinlay, J.: Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans. Graph. 5, 110ā€“141 (1986)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Dibia, V., Demiralp, Ƈ.: Data2vis: automatic generation of data visualizations using sequence-to-sequence recurrent neural networks. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 39, 33ā€“46 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Gray, R., Adams, C., Owen, D.: Accountability, Social Responsibility and Sustainability: Accounting for Society and the Environment. Pearson, Boston (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. B Lab. The B Impact Assessment v6 (2018). https://bimpactassessment.net

  20. Felber, C., Campos, V., Sanchis, J.R.: The common good balance sheet, an adequate tool to capture non-financials? Sustainability 11(14), 3791 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Ortega, A., del Carmen Olaya, M., Bastida, R., Torrent, R., SuriƱach, R.: Guia tĆØcnica per a l'elaboraciĆ² del balanƧ social. ACCID (2016)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. ISO: ISO 26000 - Social responsibility (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. ISO: ISO 14000 - Environmental management (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Standards (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. IIRC: International <IR> framework, January 2021 (2021)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. Swiss Informatics Society. Data Center Green IT Maturity Assessment (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. Matson, L.: Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System (STARS): a tool for evaluating campus sustainability. In: UC, CSU, CCC Sustainability Conference (2008)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  28. FAO: SAFA - Sustainability Assessment of Food and Agriculture systems. Guidelines version 3.0. Food and Agriculture Organization (2014)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. REAS. A Charter for the Social Solidarity Economy (2019). https://www.guerrillatranslation.org/2019/07/01/a-charter-for-the-social-solidarity-economy

  30. Xarxa d'Economia SolidƠria. El BalanƧ Social (2016). http://mercatsocial.xes.cat/ca/eines/balancsocial/

  31. EspaƱa, S., Ramautar, V., Overbeek, S., Derikx, T.: A domain-specific language for data-centric infographics: technical report. Utrecht University. arXiv:2203.09292 (2022)

  32. Benavides, D., Trinidad, P., Ruiz-CortĆ©s, A.: Automated reasoning on feature models. In: Pastor, O., FalcĆ£o e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 491ā€“503. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431855_34

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  33. Cohn, M.: User Stories Applied: For Agile Software Development. Addison-Wesley, Redwood City (2004)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  34. Waters, K.: Prioritization using MoSCoW. Agile Planning 12, 31 (2009)

    MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  35. Lavie, T., Tractinsky, N.: Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 60(3), 269ā€“298 (2004)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  36. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillside (1988)

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  37. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Hƶst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., WesslƩn, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer, Boston (2000)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  38. Zen, M., Vanderdonckt, J.: Assessing user interface aesthetics based on the inter-subjectivity of judgment. In: 30th International Human Computer Interaction Conference, pp. 1ā€“12 (2016)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  39. Tantau, T.: TikZ and PGF. Manual for version 3.1.9a. UniversitƤt zu LĆ¼beck (2021)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio EspaƱa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

EspaƱa, S., Ramautar, V., Overbeek, S., Derikx, T. (2022). Model-Driven Production of Data-Centric Infographics: An Application to the Impact Measurement Domain. In: Guizzardi, R., RalytƩ, J., Franch, X. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05759-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05760-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics