Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The B Method Meets MDE: Review, Progress and Future

Review, Progress and Future

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 446))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1778 Accesses

Abstract

Existing surveys about language workbenches (LWBs) ranging from 2006 to 2019 observe a poor usage of formal methods within domain-specific languages (DSLs) and call for identifying the reasons. We believe that the lack of automated formal reasoning in LWBs, and more generally in MDE, is not due to the complexity of formal methods and their mathematical background, but originates from the lack of initiatives that are dedicated to the integration of existing tools and techniques. To this aim we developed the Meeduse LWB and investigated the use of the B method to rigorously define the semantics of DSLs. The current applications of Meeduse show that the integration of DSLs together with theorem proving, animation and model-checking is viable and should be explored further. This technique is especially interesting for executable DSLs (xDSLs), which are DSLs with behavioural features. This paper is a review of our Formal MDE (FMDE) approach for xDSLs and a proposal for new avenues of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.stups.hhu.de/ProB/index.php5/BMotion_Studio.

References

  1. Abrial, J.R.: The B-book: Assigning Programs to Meanings. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Baar, T.: Non-deterministic constructs in OCL – what does any() mean. In: Prinz, A., Reed, R., Reed, J. (eds.) SDL 2005. LNCS, vol. 3530, pp. 32–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11506843_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bobbio, A.: System modelling with petri nets. In: Colombo, A.G., de Bustamante, A.S. (eds.) Systems Reliability Assessment, vol. 7, pp. 103–143. Springer, Dordrecht (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0649-5_6

  4. Bryant, B.R., Gray, J., Mernik, M., Clarke, P.J., France, R.B., Karsai, G.: Challenges and directions in formalizing the semantics of modeling languages. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 225–253 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS110114012B

  5. Combemale, B.: Towards Language-Oriented Modeling. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Rennes 1, December 2015

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dormoy, F.X.: SCADE 6: a model based solution for safety critical software development. In: Embedded Real Time Software and Systems (ERTS2008), Toulouse, France, January 2008. https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-02270108

  7. Gargantini, A., Riccobene, E., Scandurra, P.: Combining formal methods and MDE techniques for model-driven system design and analysis. Int. J. Adv. Softw. 1&2 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gemoc: Gemoc. http://gemoc.org/

  9. Idani, A.: Formal model-driven executable DSLs: application to Petri-Nets. Int. J. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. (ISSE) 18(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-021-00408-4

  10. Idani, A., Ledru, Y., Vega, G.: Alliance of model driven engineering with a proof-based formal approach. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 16(3), 289–307 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Idani, A., Ledru, Y., Ait Wakrime, A., Ben Ayed, R., Bon, P.: Towards a tool-based domain specific approach for railway systems modeling and validation. In: Collart-Dutilleul, S., Lecomte, T., Romanovsky, A. (eds.) RSSRail 2019. LNCS, vol. 11495, pp. 23–40. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18744-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Idani, A., Ledru, Y., Ait Wakrime, A., Ben Ayed, R., Collart-Dutilleul, S.: Incremental development of a safety critical system combining formal methods and DSMLs. In: Larsen, K.G., Willemse, T. (eds.) FMICS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11687, pp. 93–109. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27008-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Idani, A., Vega, G., Leuschel, M.: Applying formal reasoning to model transformation: the meeduse solution. In: Proceedings of the 12th Transformation Tool Contest, co-located with STAF 2019, Software Technologies: Applications and Foundations. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2550, pp. 33–44 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Iung, A., et al.: Systematic mapping study on domain-specific language development tools. Empir. Softw. Eng. 25(5), 4205–4249 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09872-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kosar, T., Bohra, S., Mernik, M.: Domain-specific languages: a systematic mapping study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 71, 77–91 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Körner, P., Bendisposto, J., Dunkelau, J., Krings, S., Leuschel, M.: Embedding high-level formal specifications into applications. In: ter Beek, M.H., McIver, A., Oliveira, J.N. (eds.) FM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11800, pp. 519–535. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30942-8_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Laleau, R., Mammar, A.: An overview of a method and its support tool for generating B specifications from UML notations. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pp. 269–272 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laleau, R., Polack, F.: Coming and going from UML to B: a proposal to support traceability in rigorous IS development. In: Bert, D., Bowen, J.P., Henson, M.C., Robinson, K. (eds.) ZB 2002. LNCS, vol. 2272, pp. 517–534. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45648-1_27

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ledang, H.: Automatic translation from UML specifications to B. In: Automated Software Engineering, p. 436 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leuschel, M., Butler, M.: ProB: an automated analysis toolset for the B method. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. (STTT) 10(2), 185–203 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mashkoor, A., Kossak, F., Egyed, A.: Evaluating the suitability of state-based formal methods for industrial deployment. Softw. Pract. Exp. 48(12), 2350–2379 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Meeduse. http://vasco.imag.fr/tools/meeduse/. Accessed 15 Dec 2020

  23. Merilinna, J., Pärssinen, J.: Verification and validation in the context of domain-specific modelling. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Domain-Specific Modeling, pp. 9:1–9:6. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meyer, E.: Développements formels par objets: utilisation conjointe de B et d’UML. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Nancy 2, March 2001

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rivera, J., Durán, F., Vallecillo, A.: Formal specification and analysis of domain specific models using maude. Simulation 85, 778–792 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Snook, C., Butler, M.: UML-B: formal modeling and design aided by UML. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 15(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Snook, C., Butler, M.: U2B-A tool for translating UML-B models into B. In: Mermet, J. (ed.) UML-B Specification for Proven Embedded Systems Design (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Steinberg, D., Budinsky, F., Paternostro, M., Merks, E.: EMF: Eclipse Modeling Framework 2.0, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tikhonova, U., Manders, M., Brand, van den, M., Andova, S., Verhoeff, T.: Applying model transformation and Event-B for specifying an industrial DSL. In: Workshop on Model Driven Engineering, Verification and Validation, pp. 41–50. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tikhonova, U.: Reusable specification templates for defining dynamic semantics of DSLs. Softw. Syst. Model. 18, 691–720 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vallecillo, A., Gogolla, M.: Adding random operations to OCL. In: Proceedings of MODELS 2017 Satellite Event, pp. 324–328. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Voelter, M., et al.: Using language workbenches and domain-specific languages for safety-critical software development. Softw. Syst. Model. 18(4), 2507–2530 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-018-0679-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zalila, F., Crégut, X., Pantel, M.: Formal verification integration approach for DSML. In: Moreira, A., Schätz, B., Gray, J., Vallecillo, A., Clarke, P. (eds.) MODELS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8107, pp. 336–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41533-3_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the LIG lab and CNRS for supporting the development of Meeduse, and he is much obliged to German Vega for his great technical contribution to the tool. This work is funded by the ANR-18-CE25-0013 PHILAE project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble INP, CNRS, LIG, 38000, Grenoble, France

    Akram Idani

Authors
  1. Akram Idani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akram Idani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

    Renata Guizzardi

  2. University of Geneva, CUI, Carouge, Switzerland

    Jolita Ralyté

  3. Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain

    Xavier Franch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Idani, A. (2022). The B Method Meets MDE: Review, Progress and Future. In: Guizzardi, R., Ralyté, J., Franch, X. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05759-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05760-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation