Skip to main content

IOHIVE: Design Requirements for a System that Supports Interactive Journaling for Beekeepers During Apiary Inspections

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research, Design, and Assessment (HCII 2022)

Abstract

In this paper, we present an ongoing project that focuses on designing interactive systems and their respective interfaces for monitoring and journaling of apiculture information acquired in the actual field during apiary inspections by the beekeepers. Initially, the paper provides a brief overview of the concepts and technologies found in the domain. Next, it examines the scenarios to be used for the design of interactions related to the actual beehive inspections and desktop use in the office. The paper mainly focuses on the design requirements based on user research. It provides a review of interaction techniques that can be implemented for journaling in the workplace of the apiary, briefly outlines the infrastructure and gives a system overview at its current state of development. Finally, the paper discusses future work including, guidelines towards the development of the various system components for journaling and a preliminary evaluation plan for the case studies that will follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdelnour Nocera, J., Barricelli, B.R., Lopes, A., Campos, P., Clemmensen, T. (eds.): HWID 2015. IAICT, vol. 468. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Satyanarayanan, M.: Pervasive computing: vision and challenges. IEEE Pers. Commun. 8, 10–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez, A., Fernández, A., Hormazábal, J.: Beyond the GUI in agriculture: a bibliographic review, challenges and opportunities (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kortum, P. (ed.): HCI Beyond the GUI: Design for Haptic, Speech, Olfactory and Other Nontraditional Interfaces. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, Boston (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bollini, L., Caccamo, A., Martino, C.: Interfaces of the agriculture 4.0. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 273–280. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, Vienna (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sperandio, G., et al.: Beekeeping and honey bee colony health: a review and conceptualization of beekeeping management practices implemented in Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 696, 133795 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Durant, J.L., Ponisio, L.C.: A regional, honey bee-centered approach is needed to incentivize grower adoption of bee-friendly practices in the almond industry. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 261 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kulhanek, K., et al.: Survey-derived best management practices for backyard beekeepers improve colony health and reduce mortality. PLoS ONE 16, e0245490 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Werner, G.: ΟΙ ΜΕΛΙΤΟΦΟΡΕΣ ΜΕΛΙΣΣΕΣ ΚΑΙ Η ΕΚΤΡΟΦΗ ΤΟΥΣ. ΒΑΣΔΕΚΗΣ (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zetterman, B.-E.A.: Beekeepers usage of IoT: Data collection, sharing and visualization in the domain of beekeeping (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fiedler, S., et al.: Implementation of the precision beekeeping system for bee colony monitoring in Indonesia and Ethiopia. In: 2020 21th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), pp. 1–6 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tashakkori, R., Hamza, A.S., Crawford, M.B.: Beemon: an IoT-based beehive monitoring system. Comput. Electron. Agric. 190, 106427 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zacepins, A., Brusbardis, V., Meitalovs, J., Stalidzans, E.: Challenges in the development of Precision Beekeeping. Biosyst. Eng. 130, 60–71 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Adams, E.C.: How to become a beekeeper: learning and skill in managing honeybees. Cult. Geogr. 25, 31–47 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Farinde, A.J., Soyebo, K.O., Oyedokun, M.O.: Improving farmers attitude towards natural resources management in a democratic and deregulated economy: honey production experience in Oyo state of Nigeria. J. Hum. Ecol. 18, 31–37 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fels, D.I., Blackler, A., Cook, D., Foth, M.: Ergonomics in apiculture: a case study based on inspecting movable frame hives for healthy bee activities. Heliyon. 5, e01973 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gentry, C.: Small Scale Beekeeping. Peace Corps Information Collection & Exchange (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hadjur, H., Ammar, D., Lefèvre, L.: Toward an intelligent and efficient beehive: a survey of precision beekeeping systems and services. Comput. Electron. Agric. 192, 106604 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. BEEP: digital tools for beekeepers. https://beep.nl

  20. OSBeehives - BuzzBox Hive Health Monitor & Beekeeping App. https://www.osbeehives.com. Accessed 11 Feb 2022

  21. beeXML.org – Collaboration platform for the standardization of the exchange of data about bees and beekeepers – BeeXML. https://beexml.org/beexml/. Accessed 30 Jan 2022

  22. Hodzic, A., Hoang, D.: Detection of Deviations in Beehives Based on Sound Analysis and Machine Learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kulyukin, V., Mukherjee, S., Amlathe, P.: Toward audio beehive monitoring: deep learning vs. standard machine learning in classifying beehive audio samples. Appl. Sci. 8, 1573 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liao, Y., McGuirk, A., Biggs, B., Chaudhuri, A., Langlois, A., Deters, V.: Noninvasive beehive monitoring through acoustic data using SAS® event stream processing and SAS® Viya®. 24 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Terenzi, A., Cecchi, S., Spinsante, S.: On the importance of the sound emitted by honey bee hives. Vet. Sci. 7, 168 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kulyukin, V., Mukherjee, S.: On video analysis of omnidirectional bee traffic: counting bee motions with motion detection and image classification. Appl. Sci. 9, 3743 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Magnier, B., Ekszterowicz, G., Laurent, J., Rival, M., Pfister, F.: Bee hive traffic monitoring by tracking bee flight paths. In: 13th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 27–29 January 2018, pp. 563–571 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spiesman, B.J., et al.: Assessing the potential for deep learning and computer vision to identify bumble bee species from images. Sci Rep. 11, 7580 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Using artificial intelligence to decode dance patterns of bees. https://www.sas.com/en_us/customers/beefutures.html. Accessed 30 Jan 2022

  30. Campbell, J., Mummert, L., Sukthankar, R.: Video monitoring of honey bee colonies at the hive entrance. In: Workshop Visual Observation and Analysis of Vertebrate and Insect Behavior (VAIB) at International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Tampa, FL, pp. 1–4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell, J.M., Dahn, D.C., Ryan, D.A.J.: Capacitance-based sensor for monitoring bees passing through a tunnel. Meas. Sci. Technol. 16, 2503–2510 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen, C., Yang, E.-C., Jiang, J.-A., Lin, T.-T.: An imaging system for monitoring the in-and-out activity of honey bees. Comput. Electron. Agric. 89, 100–109 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghadiri, A.: Implementation of an automated image processing system for observing the activities of honey bees, 100 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Mukherjee, S., Kulyukin, V.: Application of digital particle image velocimetry to insect motion: measurement of incoming, outgoing, and lateral honeybee traffic. Appl. Sci. 10, 2042 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tu, G.J., Hansen, M.K., Kryger, P., Ahrendt, P.: Automatic behaviour analysis system for honeybees using computer vision. Comput. Electron. Agric. 122, 10–18 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Aumann, H.M., Aumann, M.K., Emanetoglu, N.W.: Janus: a combined radar and vibration sensor for beehive monitoring. IEEE Sens. Lett. 5, 1–4 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Michelsen, A., Kirchner, W.H., Lindauer, M.: Sound and vibrational signals in the dance language of the honeybee, Apis mellifera. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 207–212 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schurischuster, S., Remeseiro, B., Radeva, P., Kampel, M.: A preliminary study of image analysis for parasite detection on honey bees. In: Campilho, A., Karray, F., ter Haar Romeny, B. (eds.) ICIAR 2018. LNCS, vol. 10882, pp. 465–473. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93000-8_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Hadjur, H., Ammar, D., Lefèvre, L.: Analysis of energy consumption in a precision beekeeping system. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Internet of Things, pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rahman, A.B.M.S., Lee, M., Lim, J., Cho, Y., Shin, C.: Systematic analysis of environmental issues on ecological smart bee farm by linear regression model. IJHIT 14, 61–68 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kulyukin, V.: Audio, image, video, and weather datasets for continuous electronic beehive monitoring. Appl. Sci. 11, 4632 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zacepins, A., Kviesis, A., Pecka, A., Osadcuks, V.: Development of Internet of Things concept for Precision Beekeeping. In: 2017 18th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), pp. 23–27 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kontogiannis, S.: An Internet of Things-based low-power integrated beekeeping safety and conditions monitoring system. Inventions 4, 52 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sharp, H., Preece, J., Rogers, Y.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Indianapolis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Benyon, D.: Designing User Experience: A Guide to HCI, UX and Interaction Design. Pearson, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Brown, A., Johnston, S., Kelly, K.: Using service-oriented architecture and component- based development to build web service applications, 16 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brown, A.W.: Large-Scale, Component-Based Development. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Crnkovic, I.: Component-based software engineering — new challenges in software development. Softw. Focus 2, 127–133 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mishra, S.K., Sarkar, A.: Service-oriented architecture for Internet of Things: a semantic approach. J. King Saud Univ. – Comput. Inf. Sci. (2021, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ometov, A., et al.: A survey on wearable technology: history, state-of-the-art and current challenges. Comput. Netw. 193, 108074 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yoon, H., Park, S.-H.: A non-touchscreen tactile wearable interface as an alternative to touchscreen-based wearable devices. Sensors 20, 1275 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Luczak, T., Burch, R., Lewis, E., Chander, H., Ball, J.: State-of-the-art review of athletic wearable technology: what 113 strength and conditioning coaches and athletic trainers from the USA said about technology in sports. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 15, 26–40 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Qaim, W.B., et al.: Towards energy efficiency in the internet of wearable things: a systematic review. IEEE Access 8, 175412–175435 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Beenotes app

    Google Scholar 

  55. Fitzmaurice, G.W.: Graspable user interfaces. University of Toronto (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Krestanova, A., Cerny, M., Augustynek, M.: Review: development and technical design of tangible user interfaces in wide-field areas of application. Sensors 21, 4258 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang, Q., Xiao, S., Yu, Z., Zheng, H., Wang, P.: Hand gesture recognition algorithm combining hand-type adaptive algorithm and effective-area ratio for efficient edge computing. J. Electron. Imag. 30, 063026-1–063026-18 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sinha, R.S., Wei, Y., Hwang, S.-H.: A survey on LPWA technology: LoRa and NB-IoT. ICT Express 3, 14–21 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Bor, M., Vidler, J.E., Roedig, U.: LoRa for the Internet of Things. Presented at the EWSN 2016 Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Embedded Wireless Systems and Networks, AUT, 15 February (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  60. The Things Network. https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/. Accessed 11 Feb 2022

  61. MongoDB: The Application Data Platform. https://www.mongodb.com. Accessed 11 Feb 2022

  62. Kudzu, P.C.: https://kudzu.gr/. Accessed 11 Feb 2022

Download references

Acknowledgements and Funding

This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program ‘Research Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation in South Aegean ΟΠΣ 3437’, under the call South Aegean Operational Plan 2014–2020 (project code: ΝΑΙΓ1-0043435). Parts of this work was done in collaboration with our project partners: the Institute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems and Forest Products Technology (Dr. Sofia Gounari) and Kudzu P.C [62].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Modestos Stavrakis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chamaidi, T. et al. (2022). IOHIVE: Design Requirements for a System that Supports Interactive Journaling for Beekeepers During Apiary Inspections. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability: UX Research, Design, and Assessment. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13321. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05897-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05897-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05896-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05897-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics