Abstract
System space is introduced as a conceptual design space and as a distinct space from that traditionally addressed by most design processes. The paper intends to address the increasing complexity deriving from the ongoing blend of physical and digital in a postdigital culture and contribute to the current understanding of the effect of “systemic” ways of thinking in design disciplines. We argue that a systemic perspective cannot simply be “added” to the design process and that addressing postdigital complexity, that is, producing solutions to contemporary design problems, requires instead its own conceptualization, in its own space, to be acknowledged, practiced, and formalized as a different way of thinking. We propose that system space lives in a dialectical relationship with design space within the space of the experience and that it provides a way to escape the cognitive traps in design space. We posit that the relationships between system space and design space can be apprehended by means of an exo-process adapted from systems thinking, and that the exo-process provides a supporting structure for the intentional and necessary movement between the different spaces, scales, and modes of thinking required by contemporary design work. We then illustrate such a dialectical relationship through the analysis of three different cases and draw final considerations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R.: Idealized design: creative corporate visioning. Omega 21(4), 401–410 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(93)90073-t
Agre, P.E.: Notes on the New Design Space. http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/ (2000)
Akin, Ö., Akin, C.: Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Des. Issues 17(4) (1996)
Altman, I, Vinsel, A., Brown, B.: Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: an application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In: Berkovitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 14. Academic Press (1981)
Armson, R.: Growing Wings on the Way: Systems Thinking for Messy Situations. Triarchy Press Limited (2011)
Beckett, S.J.: The logic of the design problem: a dialectical approach. Des. Issues 33(4) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00470
Benyon, D.: Spaces of Interaction, Places for Experience. Morgan and Claypool (2014)
Benyon, D., Resmini, A.: User experience in cross-channel ecosystems. In: Proceedings of the British HCI Conference 2017, Sunderland (2017)
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2) (1992)
Cross, N.: The nature and nurture of design ability. Des. Stud. 11(3), 127–140 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(90)90002-t
Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer (2006)
Curedale, R.: Design Thinking: Process and Methods, 5th edn. Design Community College (2019)
Denis, M.: Space and Spatial Cognition. Routledge (2018)
Design Council: A Study of the Design Process. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/ElevenLessons_Design_Council%20(2).pdf (2007)
Dorst, K.: The nature of design thinking. In: Proceedings of DTRS8, 8th Design Thinking Research Symposium, pp. 131–139 (2010)
Eames, C., Eames, R.: Powers of Ten. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fKBhvDjuy0 (1977)
Filler, M.: Makers of modern architecture. The New York Review of Books (2007)
Gharajedaghi, J.: Systems Thinking: Managing Chaos and Complexity: A Platform for Designing Business Architecture. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)
Glanville, R.: Researching design and designing research. Des. Issues 15(2) (1999)
Gray, D., Brown, S., Macalufo, J.: Gamestorming: A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers, and Changemakers. O’Reilly (2010)
Jones, J.C.: Design Methods. Van Nostrand Reinhold (1992)
Jones, P.H.: Systemic design principles for complex social systems. In: Metcalf, G.S. (ed.) Social Systems and Design. TSS, vol. 1, pp. 91–128. Springer, Tokyo (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54478-4_4
Hobbs, J.: Research Summary and Strategic Recommendations for the Johannesburg Art Gallery. Johannesburg Art Gallery Internal Report (2013)
Institute for the Future: Blended Reality. https://www.iftf.org/uploads/media/SR-122~2.PDF (2009)
Irwin, T.: Transition design: a proposal for a new area of design practice, study, and research. Des. Cult. 7(2), 229–246 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829
Kirby, A.: Digimodernism. Continuum (2009)
Krippendorff, K.: The Semantic Turn. CRC Press (2005)
Lawson, B.: How Designers Think, 4th edn. Routledge (2005)
Lee, O.: Dialectic and negation. Rev. Metaphys. 1(1), 3–23. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20123087 (1947)
Lindenfalk, B., Imre, Ö.: Narratives of value co-creation: elderly’s understanding of their own role in the value creation process. In: Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm, Uppsala. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2019_rp/133 (2019)
Lindenfalk, B., Resmini, A.: Blended spaces, cross-channel ecosystems, and the myth that is services. In: Proceedings of ServDes 2016. Aalborg University (2016)
Lindenfalk, B., Resmini, A.: Mapping an ambient assisted living service as a seamful cross-channel ecosystem. In: Pfannstiel, M., Rasche, M. (eds.) Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management: Theory, Concepts, Practice, pp. 289–314. Springer, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00749-2_17
Lindenfalk, B., Vimarlund, V.: Guidance through use: value as a pathfinder in e-health services implementation. In: 16th World Congress of Medical and Health Informatics: Precision Healthcare through Informatics (MedInfo 2017). Hangzhou (CN) (2017)
Logan, B., Smithers, T.: Creativity and design as exploration. In: Gero, J.S., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Modelling Creativity and Knowledge-Based Creative Design. Lawrence Erlbaum (1993)
Maher, M.L., Poon, J., Boulanger, S.: Formalising design exploration as co-evolution. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (eds.) Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD. ITIFIP, pp. 3–30. Springer, Boston, MA (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-34925-1_1
Meadows, D.H.: Thinking in Systems: A Primer. Chelsea Green Publishing (2008)
Montgomery, B.M.: Relationship maintenance versus relationship change: a dialectical dilemma. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 10(2), 205–223 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1177/026540759301000203
Norman, D.A.: The Future of Design: When you come to a fork in the road, take it. Design X – Dieci anni di design a San Marino con uno sguardo ai prossimi cento, pp. 194–207. Quodlibet (2016)
Norman, D.A., Ortony, A.: Designers and users: two perspectives on emotion and design. In: Symposium on Foundations of Interaction Design, pp. 1–13 (2003)
Resmini, A. (ed.): Reframing Information Architecture. HIS, Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06492-5
Resmini, A., Lindenfalk, B.: Mapping experience ecosystems as emergent actor-created spaces. In: Hameurlain, A., Tjoa, A.M., Chbeir, R. (eds.) Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XLVII. LNCS, vol. 12630, pp. 1–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62919-2_1
Resmini, A., Lindenfalk, B., Simeone, L., Drabble, D.: Using PLR syntax to map experience-based digital/physical ecosystems for strategic systemic change. In: Proceedings of the 23rd HCI International Conference (HCII 2021), Part III (2021)
Resmini, A., Lacerda, F.: The architecture of cross-channel ecosystems: from convergence to experience. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of Digital Ecosystems (MEDES16). Hendaye (FR) (2016)
Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973)
Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Planning problems are wicked problems. In: Cross, N. (ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, pp. 135–144. John Wiley & Sons (1984)
Ryle, G.: The Concept of Mind. Hutchinson (1949)
Schön, D.A.: Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. Knowl.-Based Syst. 5(1), 3–14 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-g
Sevaldson, B.: Giga-mapping: visualisation for complexity and systems thinking in design. In: NORDES, Nordic Design Research Conference 2011, Helsinki (2011)
Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Press (1996)
Spool, J.: The Evolution of a New UX Resolution. UI23. https://asset.uie.com/ui23/transcripts/the-evolution-of-a-new-ux-design-resolution.pdf (2018)
Sullivan, L.H.: The Tall Office Building Artistically Considered. Lippincott’s Magazine. March. https://archive.org/details/tallofficebuildi00sull (1896)
Tonkinwise, C.: Design for transitions-from and to what? Des. Philos. Pap. 13(1), 85–92 (2015)
Wurman, R.S.: UnderstandingUnderstanding. RSW & JL Publication (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lindenfalk, B., Resmini, A. (2022). The Dialectic Between System Space and Design Space. In: Soares, M.M., Rosenzweig, E., Marcus, A. (eds) Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design Thinking and Practice in Contemporary and Emerging Technologies. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05906-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05906-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05905-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05906-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)