Skip to main content

Is Off-the-Shelf VR Software Ready for Medical Teaching?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Design and Development (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Over the last decade, the use of computerized three-dimensional (3D) models in a virtual environment has become widespread to enhance medical teaching and learning, particularly in anatomy. Technologies such as Virtual Reality (VR) offer large potential to enhance medical training processes.

The research focus of this paper is to investigate the effectiveness of using predesigned off-the-shelf VR software to teach medical knowledge in comparison with a conventional teaching method. Also investigated was the degree of satisfaction associated with using VR to learn. The teaching example focuses on the anatomy of the human heart because it is one of the most challenging topics to teach and comprehend due to its complex three-dimensional nature.

A randomized controlled study was conducted with forty participants. They were equally distributed into two groups: 20 in control (non-VR) and 20 in experimental (VR) group. Two learning methods were used to study the heart. The non-VR group used PowerPoint presentation, whereas the VR group used immersive VR from off-the-shelf software.

This study subsequently gives insight on three main aspects: First, there was significant difference in anatomy knowledge within the two groups. Second, the VR group found the learning experience to be significantly more engaging, enjoyable, and useful. Third, non-customizable predesigned software can be suitable and effective for medical training tasks and applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cooper, J., Taqueti, V.: A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Postgrad. Med. J. 84(997), 563–570 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Falah, J., Charissis, V., Khan, S., Chan, W., Alfalah, S.F.M., Harrison, D.K.: Development and evaluation of virtual reality medical training system for anatomy education. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) Intelligent Systems in Science and Information 2014. SCI, vol. 591, pp. 369–383. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14654-6_23

  3. HealthySimulation.com. Virtual anatomy \(|\) healthcare simulation \(|\) healthysimulation.com (2021). https://www.healthysimulation.com/virtual-anatomy/

  4. Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., Plimmer, B.: A systematic review of virtual reality in education. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 10(2), 85–119 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maresky, H., Oikonomou, A., Ali, I., Ditkofsky, N., Pakkal, M., Ballyk, B.: Virtual reality and cardiac anatomy: exploring immersive three-dimensional cardiac imaging, a pilot study in undergraduate medical anatomy education. Clin. Anat. 32(2), 238–243 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McLachlan, J.C., Patten, D.: Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med. Educ. 40(3), 243–253 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson, D.T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W.R.J., Daniel, S.J.: Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? a randomised controlled study of a computer-generated three-dimensional anatomical ear model. Med. Educ. 40(11), 1081–1087 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petersson, H., Sinkvist, D., Wang, C., Smedby, Ö.: Web-based interactive 3d visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning. Anatom. Sci. Educ. 2(2), 61–68 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pixo. Off-the-shelf XR solutions for every organization (2021). https://pixovr.com/off-the-shelf-xr-solutions/

  10. Privett, B., Greenlee, E., Rogers, G., Oetting, T.A.: Construct validity of a surgical simulator as a valid model for capsulorhexis training. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 36(11), 1835–1838 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajid, A., et al.: Cardiology patient simulator and computer-assisted instruction technologies in bedside teaching. Med. Educ. 24(6), 512–517 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharecare Inc. Sharecare YOU (2021). https://www.sharecareyou.com/

  13. Stepan, K., et al.: Immersive virtual reality as a teaching tool for neuroanatomy. Int. Forum Allergy Rhinol. 7, 1006–1013 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Sugand, K., Abrahams, P., Khurana, A.: The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anatom. Sci. Educ. 3(2), 83–93 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Varjo Technologies Oy. System requirements - varjo.com (2021). https://varjo.com/use-center/get-started/system-requirements/#hardware

  16. Wainman, B., Wolak, L., Pukas, G., Zheng, E., Norman, G.R.: The superiority of three-dimensional physical models to two-dimensional computer presentations in anatomy learning. Med. Educ. 52(11), 1138–1146 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiaoying, L., Xianbo, S.: The application of virtual reality technology in teaching reform. In: Advanced Technology in Teaching, pp. 149–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29458-7_24

  18. Yammine, K., Violato, C.: The effectiveness of physical models in teaching anatomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Adv. Health Sci. Educ. 21(4), 883–895 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9644-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao, J., Xu, X., Jiang, H., Ding, Y.: The effectiveness of virtual reality-based technology on anatomy teaching: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Med. Educ. 20(1), 1–10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zinchenko, Y., Khoroshikh, P., Sergievich, A., Smirnov, A., Tumyalis, A., Kovalev, A., Gutnikov, S., Golokhvast, K.: Virtual reality is more efficient in learning human heart anatomy especially for subjects with low baseline knowledge. New Ideas Psychol. 59, 100786 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. med. C. Schadow from St. Marienstift hospital (Magdeburg, Germany) for the great support with our project, especially with compilation of the non-VR teaching material.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Tümler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

The software and hardware used in this study was purchased at the regular price. The authors have no connection to Varjo or Sharecare, Inc. The results presented here are based on the sole actions of the authors and are in no way related to Sharecare, Inc or Varjo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Odame, A., Tümler, J. (2022). Is Off-the-Shelf VR Software Ready for Medical Teaching?. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Design and Development. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13317. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05938-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05939-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics