Skip to main content

Typing in Mid Air: Assessing One- and Two-Handed Text Input Methods of the Microsoft HoloLens 2

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Design and Development (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13317))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Microsoft HoloLens 2 is a mixed reality (MR) headset that overlays virtual elements atop a user’s view of their physical environment. To input text, the device has the ability to track hands and fingers, allowing for direct interaction with a virtual keyboard. This is an improvement over the HoloLens 1 device, which required head tracking and single-finger air-tapping input. The present study evaluated the performance (speed and accuracy), perceived usability, mental workload, and physical exertion of one-handed and two-handed text entry. A sample of 21 participants (12 male, 9 female) aged 18–32 years typed standardized phrases presented in random order. Typing with two hands was faster and more preferred than one-handed input; however, this input method was also less accurate. Exertion in some body parts was also higher in the two-handed condition. Findings suggest that while two-handed text input was better than one-handed, there is room for improvement to approximate typing on a physical or mobile device keyboard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milman, N.B.: Defining and conceptualizing mixed reality, augmented reality, and virtual reality. Distance Learning 15(2), 55–58 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zheng, J.M., Chan, K.W., Gibson, I.: Virtual reality. IEEE Potentials 17(2), 20–23 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1109/45.666641

  3. Brigham, T.J.: Reality check: basics of augmented, virtual, and mixed reality. Med. Ref. Ser. Q. 36(2), 171–178 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Browse All HoloLens Apps: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/store/collections/hlgettingstarted/hololens. last accessed 25 Jan 2022

  5. Derby, J.L., Rarick, C.T., Chaparro, B.S.: Text input performance with a mixed reality head-mounted display (HDM). Hum. Fac. Ergono. Soc. Ann. Meet. 63, 1476–1480 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dudley, J.J., Vertanen, K., Kristensson, P.O.: Fast and precise touch-based text entry for head- mounted augmented reality with variable occlusion. ACM Trans. Comp.-Hum. Interac. 25(6), 1–40 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sears, A.: Improving touchscreen keyboards: design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interac. Comp. 3(3), 253–269 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Human Mental Workload, 139–183 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brooke, J.: SUS - a quick and dirty usability scale. Usabi. Eval. Indus. 189–194 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usability Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borg, G.: Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Microsoft: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/hardware . last accessed 23 Jan 2022

  13. MacKenzie, I.S., Soukoreff, R.W.: Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In: CHI ‘03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 754–755. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Microsoft is working on Hololens 3: Consumer version. https://mspoweruser.com/microsoft-is-working-on-hololens-3-consumer-version/. last accessed 25 Jan 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Rickel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rickel, E., Harris, K., Mandile, E., Pagliari, A., Derby, J.L., Chaparro, B.S. (2022). Typing in Mid Air: Assessing One- and Two-Handed Text Input Methods of the Microsoft HoloLens 2. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Design and Development. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13317. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05939-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05938-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05939-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics