Abstract
This paper explores the use of Augmented Reality (AR) in aviation maintenance and describes a new research study conducted in partnership with a manufacturer and a Part 121 operator. The study aims to understand the applicability of displaying maintenance instructions on a head-worn AR device. In the current study, four aviation maintenance technicians interacted with novel AR technology while performing a landing gear lubrication task. Participants reported generally positive perceptions of usability and user experience. However, some ergonomic/comfort and safety concerns were identified, along with considerations and practical applications for the AR technology. These preliminary findings illustrate the possible utility of AR in aviation maintenance, but further work is needed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note: rates vary depending on factors such as the database, aircraft type, years of study, etc.
- 2.
The response options were: Strongly disagree (1); Somewhat disagree (2); Neither disagree or agree (3); Somewhat agree (4); Strongly agree (5).
References
Avers, K.E., Johnson, W.B., Banks, J.O., Nei, D.: Prioritizing Mx human factors challenges and solutions. In: Workshop Proceedings (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-11/11). Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine, Washington, DC (2011)
Baron, R.I.: An exploration of deviations in aircraft maintenance procedures. Int. J. Appl. Aviat. Stud. 9(1), 197–206 (2009)
Bowling, S.R., Khasawneh, M.T., Kaewkuekool, S., Jiang, X., Gramopadhye, A.K.: Evaluating the effects of virtual training in an aircraft maintenance task. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 18(1), 104–116 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508410701749506
Boyd, D., Stolzer, A.: Causes and trends in mx-related accidents in FAA-certified single engine piston aircraft. J. Aviat. Technol. Eng. 5(1), 17–24 (2015)
Braly, A.M., Nuernberger, B., Kim, S.Y.: Augmented reality improves procedural work on an International Space Station science instrument. Hum. Factors 61(6), 866–878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720818824464
Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. Usabil. Eval. Indust. 189(194), 4–7 (1996)
Buderath, M., McDonald, N., Grommes, P., Morrison, R.: The operational impact to the maintainer (ground crew support and human factors). In: IET Seminar on Aircraft Health Management and New Operational and Enterprise Solutions, London (2008). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20080633
Civil Aviation Authority: CAP 1036 - Global fatal accident review 2002 to 2011. United Kingdom (2013)
De Crescenzio, F., Fantini, M., Persiani, F., Di Stefano, L., Azzari, P., Salti, S.: Augmented reality for aircraft maintenance training and operations support. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. 31(1), 96–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20080633
Eschen, H., Kötter, T., Rodeck, R., Harnisch, M., Schüppstuhl, T.: Augmented and virtual reality for inspection and maintenance processes in the aviation industry. Proc. Manuf. 19, 156–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.022
Goldman, S.M., Fiedler, E.R., King, R.E.: General aviation maintenance-related accidents: a review of ten years of NTSB data (Report No. DOT/FAA/AM-02/23). Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine (2002)
Hebert, T.R.: The impacts of using augmented reality to support aircraft maintenance. Master’s thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (2019)
Henderson, S.J., Feiner, S.K.: Augmented reality in the psychomotor phase of a procedural task. In: 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Basel, Switzerland (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2011.6092386
Hobbs, A., Williamson, A.: Aircraft maintenance survey results. Australian Transport Safety Bureau (2000)
Jo, G-S., et al.: A unified framework for augmented reality and knowledge-based systems in maintaining aircraft. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2990–2997 (2014)
Keesling, R.B.: Exploratory analysis of the potential use of augmented reality in aircraft maintenance. Theses and Dissertations, Air Force Institute of Technology, 2305 (2019)
Langer, M., Braithwaite, G.R.: The development and deployment of a maintenance operations safety survey. Hum. Factors 58(7), 986–1006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816656085
Loizeau, Q., Danglade, F., Ababsa, F., Merienne, F.: Methodology for the field evaluation of the impact of augmented reality tools for maintenance workers in the aeronautic industry. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 603189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2020.603189
Marais, K.B., Robichaud, M.R.: Analysis of trends in aviation maintenance risk: an empirical approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 106, 104–118 (2012)
Palmarini, R., Erkoyuncu, J.A., Roy, R.: An innovative process to select augmented reality (AR) technology for maintenance. Proc. CIRP 59, 23–28 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.10.001
Pozzi, J.: Will Virtual Reality Shape the Future of MRO Training? (2016). http://www.mro-network.com/
Rankin, W.: Failure to follow procedures: airline engineering and maintenance safety. In: Flightglobal and Flight International in Partnership with the Flight Safety Foundation Airline Engineering and Maintenance Safety, London, England (2013)
Schmidt, J., Lawson, D., Figlock, R.: Human Factors Analysis and Classification System-Maintenance Extension (HFACS-ME) Review of Select NTSB Maintenance Mishaps: An Update (2012). https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/Mx_hf/library/documents/media/hfacs/ntsb_hfacs-me_updated_study_report.pdf
Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., Mou, W.: Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73–80 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642626
Tang, K.S., Cheng, D.L., Mi, E., Greenberg, P.: Augmented reality in medical education: a systematic review. Canadian Med. Educ. J. 11(1), e81–e96 (2020)
Taylor, M.: TATEM: technologies and techniques for new maintenance concepts. Published Summary. http://cordis.europa.eu/publication/rcn/11816_en.html
Ward, M., Gaynor, D., Nuget, T., Morrison, R.: HILAS maintenance solutions: challenges and potentials for the aircraft maintenance industry. In: 2008 IET Seminar on Aircraft Health Management for New Operational and Enterprise Solutions, London. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20080643
Wiedenmaier, S., Oehme, O., Schmidt, L., Luczak, H.: Augmented reality (AR) for assembly processes design and experimental evaluation. Int. J. Human Comput. Interact. 16(3), 497–514 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327590IJHC1603_7
Williams, M.A., McVeigh, J., Handa, A.I., Lee, R.: Augmented reality in surgical training: a systematic review. Postgraduate Med. J. 96(1139), 537–542 (2020)
Worsfold, M., Asseman, P.: TATEM’s contribution to a future health managed enterprise (overview, context and emerging operational needs). In: IET Seminar on AHM for New Operational Enterprise Solutions. IET, Savoy Place, London, UK (2008). https://doi.org/10.1049/ic:20080631
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply
About this paper
Cite this paper
Key, K. et al. (2022). Preliminary Findings: Application of Maintenance Instructions Displayed in Augmented Reality. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Education, Aviation and Industry. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06015-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06015-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06014-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06015-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)