Abstract
This study is based on a workshop themed on Material-oriented Artefact Design (MAD) that 30 students majoring in Design from Chinese universities took part in. Through the methodology of Constructing Grounded Theory combined with the research methods of Participatory Observation, Semi-structured Interview and Questionnaire, we explored the distinctions between MAD and Problem-oriented Artefact Design (PAD), analyzed the advantages of MAD and further explained the reasons why MAD is worth refocusing on recently. The study demonstrates MAD is an effective way to break through the mode of PAD, exploring an active making route of materials as the starting point to advocate a new design language and material culture, so as to guide students to see materials as “new living species” that can interact and dialogue by continuous experiments. In this way, the relationship between designers and materials is subtly changing, from hierarchy to flat and equal relations, from passive acceptance to attentive care, which facilitates entering into the post-Anthropocene era for sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buchanan, R.: Strategies of design research: productive science and rhetorical inquiry. In: Michel, R. (ed.) Design Research Now. BIRD, pp. 55–66. Birkhäuser, Boston (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_4
Wen, R.J.: Kaogongji. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, Shanghai (2019)
Buchanan, R.: Thinking about design: an historical perspective. In: Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, pp. 414–417. Elsevier, North Holland (2009)
Kuma, K.: Material Research Studio of Kengo Kuma. ZhongXing Press, Beijing (2020)
Cross, N.: Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-301-9
J.H, Zhao.: Design and design approach research within 40 years. Decoration 185(09), 44–47 (2008)
Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)
Schön, D.: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, Cambridge (1983)
Rittel, H., Webber, M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 5, 155–169 (1973)
Buchanan, R.: Wicked problems in design thinking. Des. Issues 8(2), 5–21 (1992)
Cross, N.: Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work. Berg Publishers, Oxford (2011)
Lawson, B.: How Designers Think: The Design Process Demyistfied, 4th edn. Architectual Press, Oxford (2006). [1980]
Krippendorff, K.: The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2006)
Dell’Era, C., Magistretti, S., Cautela, C., Verganti, R., Zurlo, F.: Four kinds of design thinking: from ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing. Creativity Innov. Manag. 29(2), 324–344 (2020)
Alfoldy, S., Margot, C. (ed.): Pioneers of Modern Craft, pp. 176–185. University of Manchester Press, Manchester (1997)
Anderson, C.: Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, New York (2012)
Gershenfeld, N.: Fab: personal fabrication, Fab Labs, and the factory in your computer. Basic Books, New York (2005)
Oxman, N.: Material-based design computation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2010)
Rognoli, V., Bianchini, M., Maffei, S., Karana, E.: DIY materials. Mater. Des. 86, 692–702 (2015)
Karana, E., Barati, B., Rognoli, V., Zeeuw van der Laan, A.: Material driven design (MDD): A method to design for material experiences. Int. J. Des. 9(2), 35–54 (2015)
Dewey, J.: Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. H. Holt and Company, New York (1938)
Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006)
Brink, I., Reddy, V.: Dialogue in the making: emotional engagement with materials. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 19, 23–45 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09629-2
Sennett, R.: The Craftsman. Penguin Books, London (2009)
Mäkelä, M.: Personal exploration: serendipity and intentionality as altering positions in a creative practice. FORMakademisk 9(1), 1–12 (2016)
Johnson, M.: The Meaning of the Body. Chicago University Press, Chicago (2007)
Carter, P.: Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne University Press, Melbourne (2004)
Ingold, T.: The textility of making. Camb. J. Econ. 34, 91–102 (2010)
Zhang, L.: Design ideals and ethics in the anthropocene: non-anthropocentrism and object-oriented design. Decoration (01), 27–31 (2021)
Bennett, J.: Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University, London (2010)
Latour, B.: On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale welt, 369–381 (1996)
Harman, G.: Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin UK (2018)
Pallasmaa, J.: The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Wisdom in Architecture. Wiley, Chichester (2009)
Aktas, B., Groth, C.: Studying material interactions to facilitate a sense of being with the world. In: Design Research Society International Conference, pp. 1659–1676. Design Research Society, London (2020)
Acknowledgments
This study was conducted based on the workshop hosted by Bajiao Design. Thanks a lot to the organizers, tutors, and the 15 interviewees who shared valuable information with me.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yang, Y., Zhou, H. (2022). Material-Oriented Active Making: A Promising Approach for Sustainable Transitions. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Interaction Design Across Cultures. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13311. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06037-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06038-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)