Abstract
“Creativity obsolescence” means “once possessed”, and the “timeless classics” are “worldly and durable”. To answer the above questions, it is necessary to explore a strategy called planted obsolescence, which still plays a huge role today. Planned obsolescence is an approach used by manufacturers to take advantage of market demand. Production and consumption are two sides of the same coin. As a pilot study, this article first sorts out the ins and outs of planned obsolescence, and then combines previous research around classical, timeless design to roughly determine the research direction. According to the philosophies and currents of thought of the East and the West, the evaluation criteria are constructed. In the follow-up study, we selected suitable samples as stimuli according to the above evaluation criteria, and learned about the public’s attitude through questionnaires. It’s not to propose a new design approach to reduce the impact of planned obsolescence, but to use the philosophy of the Chinese sages to explain the purpose of “compliance with human nature”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy: The Phoebus Cartel Engineered a Shorter-lived Lightbulb and Gave Birth to Planned Obsolescence. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-great-lightbulb-conspiracy#toggle-gdpr. last accessed 15 Aug 2021
The L.E.D. Quandary: Why There’s No Such Thing as “Built to Last”. https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-l-e-d-quandary-why-theres-no-such-thing-as-built-to-last. last accessed 15 Aug 2021
The Light Bulb Conspiracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWJC5ieUAe4. last accessed 15 Aug 2021
Anonymous: Annual style change in the automobile industry as an unfair method of competition. Yale Law J. 80(3), 567–613 (1971)
Selander, S.E.: Is annual style change in the automobile industry an unfair method of competition? A Rebuttal. Yale Law J. 82(4), 691–710 (1973)
Snell, B.C.: Is annual style change in the automobile industry an unfair method of competition? a rebuttal: a reply. Yale Law J. 82(4), 711–714 (1973)
Maslow, A.H.: A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychol. Rev. 50(4), 370–396 (1943)
Maslow, A.H.: The farther reaches of human nature. J. Transpersonal Psychol. 1(1), 1–9 (1969)
Maslow, A.H.: Motivation and Personality. Harper, New York (1954)
Darley, J.M., Glucksberg, S., Kinchla, R.A.: Psychology, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1991)
Geschka, H., Holt, K., Peterlongo, G.: Need Assessment-A Key to User-oriented Product Innovation. University of Trondheim, Norwegian Institute of Technology (1981)
Park, C.W., Jaworski, B.J., Maclnnis, D.J.: Strategic brand concept-image management. J Mark 50(4), 135–145 (1986)
Sanders, E.: Product development research for the 1990’s. Proc. Hum. Fac. Ergon. Soc. Annu. Meet. 37(5), 422–426 (1993)
Urban, G.L., Hauser, J.R.: Design and Marketing of New Products, vol. 2, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1993)
Jordan, P.W.: Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis, London (1992)
Jordan, P.W.: Pleasure with Products: Human Factors for Body, Mind and Soul. In: Green, W., Jordan, P.W. (eds.) Human Factors in Product Design: Current Practice and Future Trends, pp. 206–217. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1999)
Tiger, L.: The Pursuit of Pleasure. Little Brown & Co., London (1992)
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., Butler, J.: Universal Principles of Design. Rockport, Gloucester (2003)
Yan, A., Zheng, B. (eds.) Chinese Wisdom and Modern Management, p. 33. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne (2018)
Yan, A.M.: Meta-rule analysis of justice and benefit and its application to human resource management. An Academic Edition of ManaMaga 1, 62–68 (2010)
Wan, J.R.: Between Righteousness and Benefit. Unity Press, Peking (2003)
Yeh, J.C.: An analysis of the distinction between propriety and benefit in Mencius’s political thought. Political Sci. Rev. 50, 1–36 (2011)
United Nations Millennium Declaration: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_55_2.pdf. last accessed 11 Nov 2021
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. last accessed 11 Nov 2021
Griffith, S.: Eat your greens! or design will eat itself! Des. Manag. Rev 19(4), 34–41 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sun, Y., Chiang, IY., Lin, PH., Lin, R. (2022). A Pilot Study on Sustainable Development of Design in the Context of “Creativity Obsolescence” and “Timeless Classic”. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Interaction Design Across Cultures. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13311. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06038-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06037-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06038-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)