Abstract
The majority of internet users today find their news on social media (Gil de Zúñiga et al. 2017), however, media trust, and especially trust in social media is low. (Edelman 2019) In growing political polarization the effects of perceived media hostility are also gaining more importance. In this research internet users of international news participated in an online experiment to assess how issue involvement on the 2020 military conflict between the United States and Iran correlates with general trust in the media and with the credibility of the largest social media network, Facebook, as a news source. The current research investigated whether the hostile media effect still occurs in a purely social media context and results showed that partisans (those with a strong supporting or opposing opinion on the military conflict) perceive news content on Facebook as hostile along the same lines as they do in a traditional media context. Current study fills the literature gap of the hostile media effect in a social media context. Findings may also have implications for the news industry as to how journalist roles influence users’ perceptions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nixon, B.: The business of news in the attention economy: audience labor and MediaNews Group’s efforts to capitalize on news consumption. Journalism 21(1), 1–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917719145
Thorson, K., Wells, C.: Curated flows: a framework for mapping media exposure in the digital age. Commun. Theory 26(3), 309–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12087
Gallup. Media Use and Evaluation (2019). https://news.gallup.com/poll/1663/media-use-evaluation.aspx
Fawzi, N.: Untrustworthy news and the media as “enemy of the people?” How a populist worldview shapes recipients’ attitudes toward the media. Int. J. Press/Polit. 24(2), 146–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218811981
Edelman: 2019 Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report (2019). https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2019-02/2019_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_Global_Report.pdf
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Nielsen, R.K.: Reuters digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2019)
Schaeffer, K.: Far more Americans see ‘very strong’ partisan conflicts now than in the last two Presidential Election years. Pew Research Center (2020)
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Weeks, B., Ardèvol-Abreu, A.: Effects of the news-finds-me perception in communication: social media use implications for news seeking and learning about politics. J. Comput.-Mediated Commun. 22(3), 105–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12185
Oeldorf-Hirsch, A.: The role of engagement in learning from active and incidental news exposure on social media. Mass Commun. Soc. 21(2), 225–247 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1384022
Shin, J., Thorson, K.: Partisan selective sharing: the biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. J. Commun. 67(2), 233–255 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12284
Vallone, R.P., Ross, L., Lepper, M.R.: The hostile media phenomenon: biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 49(3), 577–585 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
Perloff, R.M.: A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. In: Advances in Foundational Mass Communication Theories, pp. 196–224. Routledge (2018). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315164441-12
Gunther, A.C., Schmitt, K.: Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. J. Commun. 54(1), 55–70 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
Gunther, A.C., Liebhart, J.L.: Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. J. Commun. 56(3), 449–466 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
Christen, C.T., Kannaovakun, P., Gunther, A.C.: Hostile media perceptions: partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 united parcel service strike. Polit. Commun. 19(4), 423–436 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600290109988
Choi, J., Yang, M., Chang, J.J.: Elaboration of the hostile media phenomenon. Commun. Res. 36(1), 54–75 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650208326462
Gunther, A.C., Christen, C.T., Liebhart, J.L., Chia, S.: Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opin. Q. 65(3), 295–320 (2001)
Arpan, L.M., Raney, A.A.: An experimental investigation of news source and the hostile media effect. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 80(2), 265–281 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900308000203
Hansen, G.J., Kim, H.: Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Commun. Res. Rep. 28(2), 169–179 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
Matthes, J.: The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions. Commun. Res. 40(3), 360–387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211420255
Johnson, B.T., Eagly, A.H.: Involvement and persuasion: types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychol. Bull. 107(3), 375–384 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.375
Tsfati, Y., Cohen, J.: Perceptions of media and media effects: the third person effect, trust in media and hostile media perceptions. In: Valdivia, A.N. (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. Wiley-Blackwell (2012)
Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political Psychology, pp. 276–293. Psychology Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
Hartmann, T., Tanis, M.: Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: the role of ingroup identification and status. J. Commun. 63(3), 535–555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12031
Tsfati, Y.: Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: the case of Arabs in Israel. J. Commun. 57(4), 632–651 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
Duck, J.M., Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A.: Perceptions of a media campaign: the role of social identity and the changing intergroup context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24(1), 3–16 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298241001
Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M.J., Gallois, C.: Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias. Group Process. Intergroup Relat. 10(2), 266–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207074733
Bolsen, T., Druckman, J.N., Cook, F.L.: The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Polit. Behav. 36(2), 235–262 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
Reid, S.A.: A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. J. Commun. 62(3), 381–399 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
Schmitt, K.M., Gunther, A.C., Liebhart, J.L.: Why partisans see mass media as biased. Commun. Res. 31(6), 623–641 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204269390
Giner-Sorolla, R., Chaiken, S.: The causes of hostile media judgments. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30(2), 165–180 (1994)
Barnidge, M., Rojas, H.: Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and political talk: expanding the corrective action hypothesis. Int. J. Public Opin. Res. 26(2), 135–156 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edt032
Tsfati, Y., Cohen, J.: The influence of presumed media influence on democratic legitimacy: the case of Gaza settlers. Commun. Res. 32(6), 794–821 (2005)
Gunther, A.C.: Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opin. Q. 56(2), 147–167 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1086/269308
Klinger, U., Svensson, J.: The emergence of network media logic in political communication: a theoretical approach. New Media Soc. 17(8), 1241–1257 (2015)
Weeks, B.E., Kim, D.H., Hahn, L.B., Diehl, T.H., Kwak, N.: Hostile media perceptions in the age of social media: following politicians, emotions, and perceptions of media bias. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media 63(3), 374–392 (2019)
Noelle-Neumann, E.: The spiral of silence: public opinion–our social skin. University of Chicago Press (1993)
Gaziano, C.: How credible is the credibility crisis? Journal. Q. 65(2), 267–278 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500202
Wanta, W., Hu, Y.-W.: The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: a path analysis model. Journal. Q. 71(1), 90–98 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100109
Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opin. Q. 15(4), 635–650 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1086/266350
Gaziano, C., McGrath, K.: Measuring the concept of credibility. Journal. Q. 63(3), 451–462 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908606300301
Shearer, E., Matsa, K.E.: News use across social media platforms 2018. Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project (2018). https://www.journalism.org/2018/09/10/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2018/
Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 77(3), 515–540 (2000)
Kiousis, S.: Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Commun. Soc. 4(4), 381–403 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_4
Schmierbach, M., Oeldorf-Hirsch, A.: A little bird told me, so i didn’t believe it: Twitter, credibility, and issue perceptions. Commun. Q. 60(3), 317–337 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.688723
Westerman, D., Spence, P.R., Van Der Heide, B.: A social network as information: the effect of system generated reports of connectedness on credibility on Twitter. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(1), 199–206 (2012)
Deuze, M.: What is journalism? Journalism 6(4), 442–464 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
Hedman, U., Djerf-Pierre, M.: The social journalist. Digit. Journal. 1(3), 368–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2013.776804
Van der Wurff, R., Schoenbach, K.: Civic and citizen demands of news media and journalists: what does the audience expect from good journalism? Journal. Mass Commun. Q. 91(3), 433–451 (2014)
Tsfati, Y., Meyers, O., Peri, Y.: What is good journalism? Comparing Israeli public and journalists’ perspectives. Journalism 7(2), 152–173 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906062603
Lasorsa, D.L., Lewis, S.C., Holton, A.E.: Normalizing Twitter. Journal. Stud. 13(1), 19–36 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2011.571825
Singer, J.B.: The political j-blogger: ‘normalizing’a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journalism 6(2), 173–198 (2005)
Nah, S., Chung, D.S.: When citizens meet both professional and citizen journalists: social trust, media credibility, and perceived journalistic roles among online community news readers. Journalism 13(6), 714–730 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431381
Hanitzsch, T., Vos, T.P.: Journalism beyond democracy: a new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism 19(2), 146–164 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916673386
Schudson, M.: The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism 2(2), 149–170 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Janowitz, M.: Professional models in Journalism: the gatekeeper and the advocate. Journal. Q. 52(4), 618–626 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907505200402
Charles, M.: Advocacy journalism. In: Vos, T.P., Hanusch, F., Dimitrakopoulou, D., Geertsema-Sligh, M., Sehl, A. (eds.) The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. Wiley (2019)
Fisher, C.: The advocacy continuum: towards a theory of advocacy in journalism. Journalism 17(6), 711–726 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915582311
Crowley, M., Eric, H., Schmitt, E.: U.S. Strike in Iraq kills qassim suleimani, commander of Iranian forces. The New York Times, 2 January 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/world/middleeast/qassem-soleimani-iraq-iran-attack.html
Facebook: How Facebook’s fact-checking program works. Facebook (2019). https://www.facebook.com/journalismproject/programs/third-party-fact-checking/how-it-works
Kim, Y.: The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: the relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27(2), 971–977 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.001
Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., de Zúñiga, H.G.: Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: the moderating role of personality traits. J. Commun. 63(3), 498–516 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12034
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., Adamic, L.A.: Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239), 1130–1132 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Bail, C.A., et al.: Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115(37), 9216–9221 (2018)
Costera Meijer, I.: The paradox of popularity. Journal. Stud. 8(1), 96–116 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601056874
Mull, I.R., Lee, S.E.: “PIN” pointing the motivational dimensions behind Pinterest. Comput. Hum. Behav. 33, 192–200 (2014)
Gunther, A.C.: The persuasive press inference. Commun. Res. 25(5), 486–504 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005002
Feldman, L.: Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: a test of the hostile media effect. Polit. Behav. 33(3), 407–432 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
Watts, M.D., Domke, D., Shah, D.V., Fan, D.P.: Elite cues and media bias in presidential campaigns. Commun. Res. 26(2), 144–175 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/009365099026002003
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Csarnó, H.G., Han, YH., Hsu, SH. (2022). In Social Media We Distrust: Investigating Users’ Hostile Media Perception of Facebook News Content. In: Rau, PL.P. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Business, Communication, Health, Well-being, and Inclusiveness. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13313. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06050-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06050-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06049-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06050-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)