Abstract
Across English Language Arts classrooms in the United States many students experience low reading comprehension and struggle to stay engaged with their learning while working independently [1]. Our cross-functional team partnered with middle school teachers and students to develop an educational tool that provides reading skills support. Through three design thinking stages, we present our method, experiences, and initial outcomes developing a reading tool for middle school English Language Arts classrooms. In Stage One, we empathized with users to understand their needs and pain points and identified the problem statement: students often do not work well independently and struggle to stay engaged with reading. In Stage Two, we explored design solutions to address the problem statement and engaged in iterative prototyping. At the end of this stage, we developed an alpha version of our reading tool that included both annotation and reading comprehension check features. In Stage Three, we conducted initial user testing and evaluation of the tool in middle school classrooms (Teacher Nā=ā3; Student Nā=ā171). Teachers found they were able to implement the tool flexibly to fit their planned lessons and instruct students at different reading levels. Students worked independently with the tool, reported that it was usable, and perceived it would improve their reading comprehension. Overall, this study shows how a tool with annotation and metacognitive-check features can support students in the classroom, and offers next steps for the development of effective reading tools.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., Doorey, N.A.: Retooling Literacy Education for the 21st Century: Key Findings of the Reading for Understanding Initiative and Their Implications. Educational Testing Service, 2018. Center for Research on Human Capital and Education
Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education (ed.), National Assessment of Educational Progress (2019)
McWilliams, K., et al.: Unpacking the black box of efficacy: a framework for evaluating the effectiveness and researching the impact of digital learning tools [White Paper]. In: MacMillan Learning (2017)
Graesser, A.C., et al.: Educational technologies that support reading comprehension for adults who have low literacy skills. In: The Wiley Handbook of Adult Literacy, pp. 471ā493 (2019)
OāReilly, T., Sheehan, K.M.: Cognitively based assessment of, for, and as learning: a framework for assessing reading competency. ETS Res. Rep. Ser. 2009(2), iā43 (2009)
Johnson, T.E., Archibald, T.N., Tenenbaum, G.: Individual and team annotation effects on studentsā reading comprehension, critical thinking, and meta-cognitive skills. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1496ā1507 (2010)
Collins, A., Kapur, M.: Cognitive apprenticeship. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 109ā127. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., Chapman, S.: Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Rev. Educ. Res. 66(2), 181ā221 (1996)
AbuSeileek, A.F.: Hypermedia annotation presentation: the effect of location and type on the EFL learnersā achievement in reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. Comput. Educ. 57(1), 1281ā1291 (2011)
Agarwal, P.K., Nunes, L.D., Blunt, J.R.: Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: a systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 33(4), 1409ā1453 (2021)
Graham, S., Hebert, M.: Writing to read: evidence for how writing can improve reading. In: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. 2010, Alliance for Excellent Education: Washington, DC
Sauro, J., Lewis, J.R.: When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hutson, J.P., Montilus, K.D., Herrick, K.S., Lamond, M.R. (2022). Designing a Digital Reading Tool for Middle School Students and Teachers: A Grounded, User-Centered Design Approach. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1582. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06391-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06391-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06390-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06391-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)