Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Exploratory Factor Analysis of Illusion in the Virtual Character System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1583))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1369 Accesses

Abstract

This study reviews related works in regard to the embodiment of virtual character and the illusion in the virtual reality (VR). There are five types of illusion shown in the result according to the characteristics of place illusion, plausibility illusion, body illusion, partial awareness of illusion, and illusion of movement. In order to analyze possible factors of illusion in VR, the meaning and interaction behavior of illusion is defined. Furthermore, the questionnaire items are joined based on the meaning as well as the implicit and explicit interaction of users from the five constructs of illusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bailey, J.O., Bailenson, J.N., Casasanto, D.: When does virtual embodiment change our minds? Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 25(3), 222–233 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barsalou, L.W.: Grounded cognition. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617–645 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

  3. Barsalou, L. W.: Grounded cognition: past, present, and future. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2(4), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01115.x

  4. Berthiaume, M., Corno, G., Nolet, K., Bouchard, S.: A novel integrated information processing model of presence. PRESENCE: Virtual Augmented Reality 27(4), 378–399 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00336

  5. Blanke, O.: Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 556–571 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3292

  6. Calvert, G., Spence, C., Stein, B.E.: The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, J.I., Markman, A.B.: The future of embodied cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4(4), 685–793 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dummer, T., Picot-Annand, A., Neal, T., Moore, C.: Movement and the rubber hand illusion. Perception 38(2), 271–280 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1068/p5921

  9. Gallagher, S.: Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed). 4, 14–21 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5

  10. Gonzalez-Franco, M., Lanier, J.: Model of illusions and virtual reality. Front. Psychol. 8, 1125 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01125

  11. Gonzalez-Franco, M., Peck, T.C.: Avatar embodiment. towards a standardized questionnaire. Front. Robot. AI 5:74 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00074

  12. Haggard, P., Chambon, V.: Sense of agency. Curr. Biol. 22, R390–R392 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040

  13. Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D.: Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 7(2), 174–196 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeon, M.: Emotions and Affect in Human Factors and Human-Computer Interaction. Academic Press, San Diego (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeon, M., Fishwick, P.: Special Issue on Arts, Aesthetics, and Performance in Telepresence: Guest Editors’ Introduction: Homo Ludens in Virtual Environments. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 26(2), iii–vii (2017). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_e_00295

  16. Klemmer, S.R., Hartmann, B., Takayama, L.: How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. In: Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality, Presence, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 373–387 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124

  18. Lenggenhager, B., Mouthon, M., Blanke, O.: Spatial aspects of bodily self-consciousness. Conscious. Cogn. 18(1), 110–117 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marshall, P., Antle, A., Van Den Hoven, E., Rogers, Y.: Special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 20(1), 1–3 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peck, T.C., Gonzalez-Franco, M.: Avatar Embodiment. A Standardized Questionnaire, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, vol.1, p. 44 (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frvir.2020.575943.DOI=10.3389/frvir.2020.575943

  21. Riecke, B.E., Feuereissen, D., Rieser, J.J., McNamara, T.P.: Self-motion illusions (vection) in VR — Are they good for anything? IEEE Virtual Reality Workshops (VRW) 2012, 35–38 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2012.6180875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slater, M.: Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364(1535), 3549–3557 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slater, M.: Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. Br. J. Psychol. 109(3), 431–433 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Corominas, D.: Simulating virtual environments within virtual environments as the basis for a psychophysics of presence. ACM Trans. Graphics 29(4), 92 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao, R., Benko, H.: Augmenting the field-of-view of head-mounted displays with sparse peripheral displays. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA, 7–12 May 2016). CHI 2016, pp. 1221–1232. ACM, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.: The proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum. Commun. Res. 33, 271–290 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ratan, R.A., Hasler, B.: Self-presence standardized: introducing the self-presence questionnaire (SPQ). In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Workshop on Presence (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Emmelkamp, P.M., Krijn, M., Hulsbosch, A.M., De Vries, S., Schuemie, M.J., van der Mast, C.A.: Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia. Behav. Res. Ther. 40(5), 509–516 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lepecq, J., Bringoux, L., Pergandi, J., Coyle, T., Mestre, D.: Afforded actions as a behavioral assessment of physical presence in virtual environments. Virtual Reality 13(3), 141–151 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions deter mining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan, MOST 108-2410-H-309-008-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Management, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Huey-Min Sun

Authors
  1. Huey-Min Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huey-Min Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Crete and Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Constantine Stephanidis

  2. Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Margherita Antona

  3. Foundation for Research and Technology – Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete, Greece

    Stavroula Ntoa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sun, HM. (2022). The Exploratory Factor Analysis of Illusion in the Virtual Character System. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06393-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06394-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics