Skip to main content

Reconstruction and Physiological Basis of Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Stress Score

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Abstract

The detection and avoidance of negative stress are worthwhile endeavors from economic, individual, and public health perspectives. At the same time, the proliferation of wearables promises monitoring of physiological characteristics continuously and at a low cost. However, existing stress tracking solutions use proprietary methodology when operationalizing physiological measurements into abstract stress measures and remain vague on the implementation details.

We investigated the stress measuring capabilities of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 smartwatch, as it was one of the first wearables to be advertised for its stress score functionality.

Forty-five participants were exposed to cognitive load under time pressure in a randomized controlled trial. The smartwatch recorded stress scores during the experiment, and an ECG was used to monitor cardiac activity. The latter allowed us to record individual stress reactions through different heart rate variability measures (HRV). Subjective perception of the workload was reported using the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire.

The smartwatch primarily relies on heart rate (bpm) to derive its stress metrics. We were able to reconstruct Samsung’s stress score closely; a random forest regressor based on five features models the smartwatch’s stress score with a significant coefficient of determination. However, the physiological responses indicate a sub-optimal induction of cognitive workload through the chosen mental arithmetic task.

Smartphone manufacturers are eager to advertise stress monitoring features but often fail to define what exactly these are doing. Moreover, while the literature provides a body of evidence for measuring short-term mental stress through HRV metrics, the smartwatch we investigated primarily relies on plain heart rate readings to determine the mental state of its users. This could indicate a lack of scientific backing and should be considered when choosing a valid and reliable tool for stress monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Max HR, Median NNI, Min HR, STD HR, pNN50.

References

  1. Stress at work. (October 2020). https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB99101, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-101/default.html

  2. Gilgen-Ammann, R., Schweizer, T., Wyss, T.: RR interval signal quality of a heart rate monitor and an ECG holter at rest and during exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119(7), 1525–1532 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hart, S.G.: Nasa-Task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 50, pp. 904–908. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jeyhani, V., Mahdiani, S., Peltokangas, M., Vehkaoja, A.: Comparison of HRV parameters derived from photoplethysmography and electrocardiography signals. In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), pp. 5952–5955. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215

  6. Lin, W.-H., Wu, D., Li, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y.-T.: Comparison of heart rate variability from PPG with that from ECG. In: Zhang, Y.-T. (ed.) The International Conference on Health Informatics. IP, vol. 42, pp. 213–215. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Mayya, S., Jilla, V., Tiwari, V.N., Nayak, M.M., Narayanan, R.: Continuous monitoring of stress on smartphone using heart rate variability. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. McEwen, B.S.: The neurobiology of stress: from serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 886(1–2), 172–189 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parent-Thirion, A.: Fourth European working conditions survey. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2006/98/en/2/ef0698en.pdf (2007)

  10. For Safety, E.A. at Work H: European opinion poll on occupational safety and health (2013). https://doi.org/10.2802/55505

  11. Salleh, M.R.: Life event, stress and illness. Malays. J. Med. Sci. MJMS 15(4), 9 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segerstrom, S.C., Miller, G.E.: Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol. Bull. 130(4), 601 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Speer, K.E., Semple, S., Naumovski, N., McKune, A.J.: Measuring heart rate variability using commercially available devices in healthy children: a validity and reliability study. Eur. J. Invest. Health Psychol. Educ. 10(1), 390–404 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tan, S.Y., Yip, A.: Hans Selye (1907–1982): founder of the stress theory. Singapore Med. J. 59(4), 170 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Y., Fischer, N., Bry, F.: Pervasive persuasion for stress self-regulation. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 724–730. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Won, E., Kim, Y.K.: Stress, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune-kynurenine pathway in the etiology of depression. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 14(7), 665–673 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert P. Spang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Spang, R.P., Machačík, O., Pieper, K., Vergari, M., Voigt-Antons, JN. (2022). Reconstruction and Physiological Basis of Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Stress Score. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06393-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06394-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics