Abstract
The detection and avoidance of negative stress are worthwhile endeavors from economic, individual, and public health perspectives. At the same time, the proliferation of wearables promises monitoring of physiological characteristics continuously and at a low cost. However, existing stress tracking solutions use proprietary methodology when operationalizing physiological measurements into abstract stress measures and remain vague on the implementation details.
We investigated the stress measuring capabilities of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active2 smartwatch, as it was one of the first wearables to be advertised for its stress score functionality.
Forty-five participants were exposed to cognitive load under time pressure in a randomized controlled trial. The smartwatch recorded stress scores during the experiment, and an ECG was used to monitor cardiac activity. The latter allowed us to record individual stress reactions through different heart rate variability measures (HRV). Subjective perception of the workload was reported using the NASA Task Load Index questionnaire.
The smartwatch primarily relies on heart rate (bpm) to derive its stress metrics. We were able to reconstruct Samsung’s stress score closely; a random forest regressor based on five features models the smartwatch’s stress score with a significant coefficient of determination. However, the physiological responses indicate a sub-optimal induction of cognitive workload through the chosen mental arithmetic task.
Smartphone manufacturers are eager to advertise stress monitoring features but often fail to define what exactly these are doing. Moreover, while the literature provides a body of evidence for measuring short-term mental stress through HRV metrics, the smartwatch we investigated primarily relies on plain heart rate readings to determine the mental state of its users. This could indicate a lack of scientific backing and should be considered when choosing a valid and reliable tool for stress monitoring.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Max HR, Median NNI, Min HR, STD HR, pNN50.
References
Stress at work. (October 2020). https://doi.org/10.26616/NIOSHPUB99101, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/99-101/default.html
Gilgen-Ammann, R., Schweizer, T., Wyss, T.: RR interval signal quality of a heart rate monitor and an ECG holter at rest and during exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 119(7), 1525–1532 (2019)
Hart, S.G.: Nasa-Task load index (NASA-TLX); 20 years later. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, vol. 50, pp. 904–908. Sage publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA (2006)
Jeyhani, V., Mahdiani, S., Peltokangas, M., Vehkaoja, A.: Comparison of HRV parameters derived from photoplethysmography and electrocardiography signals. In: 2015 37th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), pp. 5952–5955. IEEE (2015)
Lazarus, R.S., Folkman, S.: Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215
Lin, W.-H., Wu, D., Li, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y.-T.: Comparison of heart rate variability from PPG with that from ECG. In: Zhang, Y.-T. (ed.) The International Conference on Health Informatics. IP, vol. 42, pp. 213–215. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03005-0_54
Mayya, S., Jilla, V., Tiwari, V.N., Nayak, M.M., Narayanan, R.: Continuous monitoring of stress on smartphone using heart rate variability. In: 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2015)
McEwen, B.S.: The neurobiology of stress: from serendipity to clinical relevance. Brain Res. 886(1–2), 172–189 (2000)
Parent-Thirion, A.: Fourth European working conditions survey. http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2006/98/en/2/ef0698en.pdf (2007)
For Safety, E.A. at Work H: European opinion poll on occupational safety and health (2013). https://doi.org/10.2802/55505
Salleh, M.R.: Life event, stress and illness. Malays. J. Med. Sci. MJMS 15(4), 9 (2008)
Segerstrom, S.C., Miller, G.E.: Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol. Bull. 130(4), 601 (2004)
Speer, K.E., Semple, S., Naumovski, N., McKune, A.J.: Measuring heart rate variability using commercially available devices in healthy children: a validity and reliability study. Eur. J. Invest. Health Psychol. Educ. 10(1), 390–404 (2020)
Tan, S.Y., Yip, A.: Hans Selye (1907–1982): founder of the stress theory. Singapore Med. J. 59(4), 170 (2018)
Wang, Y., Fischer, N., Bry, F.: Pervasive persuasion for stress self-regulation. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), pp. 724–730. IEEE (2019)
Won, E., Kim, Y.K.: Stress, the autonomic nervous system, and the immune-kynurenine pathway in the etiology of depression. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 14(7), 665–673 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Spang, R.P., Machačík, O., Pieper, K., Vergari, M., Voigt-Antons, JN. (2022). Reconstruction and Physiological Basis of Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Stress Score. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1583. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06393-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06394-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)