Skip to main content

Relaunch of an Industrial Laser Control Software – Influence of Perceived Competence on Usability and Acceptance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Usability and user acceptance play an important role in the development of new systems. In the present study, a new generation of laser control software from TRUMPF Laser GmbH was evaluated regarding its usability and acceptance in a formative remote usability test. Because change processes, such as software relaunches, can lead to a change in the subjectively perceived competence of users, the study focusses on evaluating differences between two competence groups (“low competence” and “high competence” in operating the current laser control software; N = 35). Basic interactions on the prototype of the new generation of laser control software were tested in seven tasks. The results of the study show that the two competence groups do not differ significantly in their performance or acceptance. However, it could also be shown that users with different prior knowledge should be supported differently when transitioning to the new software.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. TRUMPF GmbH + Co. KG (Holding): Trumpf Internal Website (2020). https://www.trumpf.com/de_INT/

  2. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Global Edition. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ullrich, A., Vladova, G., Thim, C., Gronau, N.: Organisationaler Wandel und Mitarbeiterakzeptanz. Vorgehen und Handlungsempfehlungen. [Organisational change and employee acceptance. Procedure and recommendations for action] In: Obermaier, R. (ed.) Handbuch Industrie 4.0 und Digitale Transformation [Handbook Industry 4.0 and Digital Transformation], pp. 565–587. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24576-4_23

  4. Ullrich, A., Vladova, G., Thim, C., Gronau, N.: Akzeptanz und Wandlungsfähigkeit im Zeichen der Industrie 4.0 [Acceptance and transformability under the sign of Industry 4.0]. HMD, vol. 52, pp. 769–789 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1365/s40702-015-0167-8

  5. Wiendick, G.: Akzeptanz [Acceptance]. In: Frese, E. (ed.) Handwörterbuch der Organisation. Enzyklopädie der Betriebswirtschaftslehre [Hand dictionary of organisation. Encyclopaedia of Business Administration], vol. 2, pp. 89–98. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vogelsang, K., Steinhüser, M., Hoppe, U.: Theorieentwicklung in der Akzeptanzforschung: Entwicklung eines Modells auf Basis einer qualitativen Studie [Theory development in acceptance research: development of a model based on a qualitative study]. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik [Business Informatics] (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dillon, A.: User acceptance of information technology Encyclopedia of Human Factors and Ergonomics. Taylor and Francis, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gill, R.: Change management–or change leadership? J. Chang. Manag. 3, 307–318 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/714023845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Doppler, K., Lauterburg, C.: Change Management. Den Unternehmenswandel gestalten [Shaping corporate change]. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Landes, M., Steiner, E.: Psychologische Auswirkungen von Change Prozessen: Widerstände, Emotionen, Veränderungsbereitschaft und Implikationen für Führungskräfte [Psychological effects of change processes: resistance, emotions, readiness to change and implications for managers]. In: Landes, M., Steiner, E. (eds.) Psychologie der Wirtschaft [Psychology of the economy], pp. 721–750. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-18957-4_34

  11. Rafferty, A.E., Griffin, M.A.: Perceptions of organizational change: a stress and coping perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 1154–1162 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roth, S.: Emotionen im Visier: Neue Wege des Change Management [Focusing on emotions: New ways of change management] (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. TRUMPF Laser GmbH (Pfeifle, Erik): Internal Findings. Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dreyfus, S.E., Dreyfus, H.L.: A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition (1980). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a084551.pdf

  15. Dreyfus, S.E.: The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull. Sci. Technol. Soc. 24, 177–181 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Figma. Figma Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maze. Maze.design Limited, Faversham, United Kingdom (2018). https://www.notion.so/Press-Kit-421d405e76154662a547ce9ef2a3f018

  18. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V.: Ergonomie der Mensch-System-Interaktion - Teil 210: Menschzentrierte Gestaltung interaktiver Systeme [Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design of interactive systems] (ISO 9241-210:2019); Deutsche Fassung EN ISO 9241-210:2019 (DIN EN ISO 9241–210). Beuth Verlag GmbH, vol. 13.180, 35.180 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rummel, B.: System Usability Scale – jetzt auch auf Deutsch [- now also in German] (2016). https://blogs.sap.com/2016/02/01/system-usability-scale-jetzt-auch-auf-deutsch/

  20. Brooke, J.: SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., McClelland, I.L., Weerdmeester, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. CRC Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., de Waard, D.: A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 5, 1–10 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00025-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kondzior, M.: Akzeptanzskala: Methode zur Erfassung der Akzeptanz eines Systems [Acceptance scale: Method for recording the acceptance of a system] (n.d.). http://www.hfes-europe.org/accept/accept_de.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lena Schwaiger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schwaiger, L., Radziwill, M., Wagner-Hartl, V. (2022). Relaunch of an Industrial Laser Control Software – Influence of Perceived Competence on Usability and Acceptance. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06416-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06417-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics